Chechnya: of flags, prayers and swords, wolves, dogs, and hyenas

Analysts have tended to call such individuals “lone wolves,” in my view, a romanticizing term that suggests a cunning and deadly predator. A few of those recorded here display this kind of lethal determination, but others, while still dangerous, skulk about, sniffing at violence, vocally aggressive but skittish without backup. “Stray dogs,” not lone wolves, more accurately describes their behavior.

JM Berger talks about lone wolves in The Utility of Lone Wolves, or lack thereof:

If there were any doubts that lone wolves can be deadly, they were dispelled by Anders Breivik, the Norwegian anti-Muslim crusader who in July killed 69 young people in a coordinated attack using guns and a car bomb.

and again in The Boy Who Cried Lone Wolf:

Does it matter that some (but not all) of the terrorist network members described above were actually undercover law enforcement agents or informants? It doesn’t change the fact that none of these individuals was working alone. They were receiving advice, concrete assistance, and passive reinforcement from people they believed — rightly or wrongly — to be part of larger terrorist organizations.

None of this means that these guys aren’t dangerous, and none of this is to argue that they shouldn’t have been arrested. But they are not lone wolves. They are essentially al Qaeda volunteers …

But I’ll let Tim Furnish have the last word on nomenclature. In a comment here on Zenpundit he told us he’d originally entitled his HNN blog post “The Brothers Tsarnaev: Hyenas in the Service of the Mahdi” — and in the post itself he writes:

But viewing them from outside, analytically, as lone wolves may give them too much credit; while classifying them as stray dogs neutered of religious ideology gives the Islamic element too little. Perhaps a new paradigm, one of roaming hyenas, best describes the Tsarnaevs — characterized by anomie (fitting into neither domestic nor foreign contexts), the ability to feign surrender when necessary, and a propensity for attacking only the defenseless.

**

And oh, by way of cosmic irrelevance, my googling brought me here:

It’s a web-wild-world we live in!

Page 2 of 2 | Previous page

  1. Steve Engel:

    Another illuminating, exhilarating blog entry, Charles. Another touch of synchronicity: the U.S. government today released preliminary plans to withdraw special protection for wolves. Also, check out Oregon-7, a lone wolf that has wandered from Eastern Oregon down into California and appears to be heading back–all in quest of a mate, apparently. Can’t a wolf just have wanderlust? Also recommended (somehow it seems relevant to everything in the world) is the PBS Nature program on wolves and grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park. They are so charming and familiar and exhilarating–at a distance.
     
    A friend of mine who spent years in Africa, studying hyenas, was the first one to tell me that any smart predator will withdraw from its kill when the hyenas arrive–and that the female hyena (hello, Mama Tsarnaev?) has a penis.