BLOGGING ON BURMA

Wizards of Oz, Enterprise Resilience Management Blog, Thomas P.M. Barnett, TDAXP, Hidden Unities, Pundita, Agam’s Gecko, Democracy Project , Simulated Laughter -New!

Free Burma!

  1. USpace:

    Great job! FREE Burma!!!

    Bush slammed the UN and the rulers of Myanmar in his UN speech last week.

    The UN must do something, but they never use military force to fight.
    That is a huge problem.

    Illegal drug fortunes are a BIG part of this.

    absurd thought –
    God of the Universe says
    please support EVIL rulers

    the Left condemns Burma’s
    while its China coddles them

    absurd thought –
    God of the Universe wants
    complete narco states

    criminals in power
    loving the corrupt drug war

    absurd thought –
    God of the Universe thinks
    keep trying communism

    you can never KILL too much
    pursuing Utopia…

    http://free-burma.org/

    http://absurdthoughtsaboutgod.blogspot.com/

    🙂
    .

  2. deichmans:

    Don’t forget A.E. at Simulated Laughter.

  3. Dave Schuler:

    Re: the post on Tom Barnett’s blog. Dr. Barnett has misread my assertion. I’m not claiming that the idea of Core and Gap is aspirational; I’m claiming it’s an hypothesis and requires prove of validity. Pointing to the lines on the map isn’t proof. Dr. Barnett is assuming his conclusion (a fallacy called “begging the question”).

  4. deichmans:

    Dave,

    Re: Core v Gap — is it really a hypohesis, or is it simply an organizing principal? If the former, you’re correct — there should be empirical evidence of “Gapness” that correlates to the geospatial definition. However, if it’s an ontological construct — cast in the mold of “bipolarism” — then your criterion is too stringent.

    sf/ shane

  5. Dave Schuler:

    “Strategic reality” (Dr. Barnett’s characterization of Core and Gap) sounds like a little more than an organizing principle to me. The long and short of my objection is that I’m concerned about disprovability. Without rigorous definitions, Dr. Barnett’s assertions are untestable, not disprovable, and, consequently, metaphysics.