A not-so-brief brief: Adnan Oktar to President Obama
There’s one really interesting reference in Solberg’s text that bears implications in many other realms than that of Islamic apocalyptic:
According to Snow and Benford (1988), the three core framing tasks of a movement are to identify a problem and identify who is to blame (diagnostic framing), articulate solutions (prognostic framing) and urge others to act (motivational framing).
I think those distinctions will likely serve us very well in thinking through the entire complex issue of terrorism and counterterrorism.
And here are two key points, rephrased by Solberg from Yahya’s writings, which give us Yahya’s perspective on both the caliphate and the possibility that the Mahdi will be a warrior in the literal as well as the spiritual or ideological sense:
Those are two fascinating points at this juncture in history.
**
In closing..
Solberg’s book is subtitled An Analysis of the Harun Yahya Enterprise — is the Harun Yahya Enterprise in fact another name for the System of the Mahdi? If so, these words from her closing paragraphs give an idea of the scope of the Mahdi’s intent:
The magnitude and span of the Harun Yahya enterprise operation suggests that this is an enterprise with very high ambitions in terms of having a major impact both in Turkey and globally. As indicated in the introduction chapter, the Harun Yahya enterprise does appear to have a considerable impact with regards to its promotion of creationism. As I have attempted to show, however, the purpose of the creationist activism of Harun Yahya is not only to convince the audience that the theory of evolution is wrong, but also to promote Adnan Oktar himself. This aspect of the Harun Yahya enterprise has, as we have seen, become more pronounced especially after 2009, with the publication of books that appear to be designed to create the impression that Adnan Oktar might be the Mahdi. One might speculate that the reason for this increasingly insistent and explicit approach is the recognition that Adnan Oktar, contrary to expectations, has not been widely recognized and affirmed as neither a Muslim authority, nor a Mahdi.
We shall see..
Page 3 of 3 | Previous page
Tim Furnish:
December 5th, 2014 at 1:49 pm
Good job, as always, Charles–and thanks for the citations.
As you know, I went to Istanbul in 2008 and interviewed Oktar. His followers clearly think that he is the Mahdi.
Another notable aspect of Oktar’s Mahdist system is the prevalence of a harem of extremely attractive, blonde (sic), and probably artificially-enhanced women.
To paraphrase Tom Petty, it’s good to be Mahdi.
Tim
Charles Cameron:
December 5th, 2014 at 2:50 pm
Thanks, Tim.
.
Harun Yahya’s latest offering is somewhat surprising: A World leader who represented the modern, highquality face of Islam: Ataturk.
Charles Cameron:
December 7th, 2014 at 8:30 am
Today:
.
.