After IS, what next? — the missing (apocalyptic) strand
[ by Charles Cameron — four recent tweets, some lines of inquiry, & no certain conclusion, no date certain ]
.
The four recent tweets that set me off..
#ISIS spokesman said that even if group loses #Mosul #Raqqah #Sirte, it will not be defeated until it loses its faith-based fighting spirit
— SITE Intel Group (@siteintelgroup) May 21, 2016
#IS: "Do you think that you will be victorious if you killed ['Umar] al-Shîshânî or Abû Bakr [al-Baghdâdî] or Abû Zayd [?] or Abû 'Amr [?]"
— Mr. Orange (@Mr0rangetracker) May 21, 2016
#Adnani audiotape another sign of #ISIL leaders in deep hiding, afraid to appear in public, or already dead. Days are numbered. #ISIS #Daesh
— Brett McGurk (@brett_mcgurk) May 21, 2016
ISIS knows Al Qaeda is planning to challenge ISIS in its stronghold — Syria https://t.co/Wq9ArSDbX2
— Mike Walker (@New_Narrative) May 21, 2016
**
There are a multitude of voices now raising the question After ISIS< What Next? They can be heard from as far back as October 2014, onwards:
and most recently:
If IS continues losing territory, as suggested in the tweets above, this question can only gain in force.
**
I have been following Islamic eschatology since 1998 or thereabouts, when I met David Cook, and I thought that what was at that time an eerily unappreciated question had at last made its way into informed consciousness after..
Page 1 of 2 | Next page