zenpundit.com » 2005 » February

Archive for February, 2005

Monday, February 21st, 2005

NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT

On a lark, I checked out some handguns today. When I was quite young, I was a crack shot with a small-bore rifle and was in a gun club that produced at least two national champions and one West Pointer. However, I haven’t fired a gun of any kind in at least 15 years. I don’t have any interest in hunting per se but I would like to try my hand again at some targets, this time with a pistol.

Wandering around Gander Mountain amongst taciturn men with beards dressed in camouflage I found a prodigious display of Smith & Wesson automatics of various calibers with a company representative on hand. What caught my eye, though, were the blocky Taurus .44 magnums. A lot of heft and their .45 was even larger – if just waving this pistol didn’t scare away an intruder you could probably kill them simply by throwing it at their head.

Frankly, not being a ” gun nut” and not really know that much about the fine points of handguns and since I’ll need to apply for a FOID card first, I’m going to take my sweet time reading up before shelling out ( pun intended) $ 500-$800 for essentially a new and time-consuming amusement. If there are any gun aficianados out there with recommendations for something reliable, I’m all ears.

Sunday, February 20th, 2005

RECOMMENDED READING

A quickie list of what has caught my attention in the last few days:

Younghusband’s comments on China and the Internet at Coming Anarchy.

Dr. Barnett’s analysis on the U.S.-China-North Korean diplomatic triangle.

JB at riting on the wall on China’s Uighurs in Kyrgyzstan.

Bad or at least superfluous advice from Tariq Ramadan on American relations with Europe. Hat tip to Marc Shulman.

The coming battle over the President’s Daily Brief by Larry Johnson at the Counterterrorism Blog, now that the tough as nails John Negroponte will become the National Intelligence Director. I strongly endorse Johnson’s idea of bringing the POTUS back into contact with real, live, CIA analysts instead of just senior CIA managers or political appointees.

This is a timely issue and an important one. The president ( any president) needs something that is concise and combines timely intel with the ability to look ahead in context. I’d recommend an Open Sources addition to the PDB that is deeper analytically than the usual, daily news digest prepared by the WH staff. Probably this would be best selected by a really, really, bright and horizontal-thinking NSC staffer who also has experience working with the IC on issues and understands their perspective as well to avoid redundancy.

Sunday, February 20th, 2005

HOW GEORGE W. BUSH CAN CHANGE THE WORLD IN FOUR YEARS

Love him or hate him, the administration of George W. Bush has already made a significant mark on history. Here’s how he could solidify his legacy while reshaping the world:

1. CREATE AN EAST-ASIAN COUNTERPART TO NATO:

Asia has several strategic flashpoints and balance of power problems that require resolution if the region is to grow peacefully into the Core in the coming decades. Obviously there is North Korea and the Indian-Pakistani nuclear rivalry and the perennial China-Taiwan standoff. Aside from these immediate problems, three longer range structural dilemas require consideration:

a) Integrating the regional Gap – Vietnam, Laos, Burma, North Korea, Bangladesh, Indonesia and the Central Asian states.

b) Preventing the emergence of Sino-Indian, Sino-Japanese, Japanese- United Korean and Sino-Russian military rivalry with or without an anti-American power bloc aspect. Either is bad though the latter is even worse from a strategic standpoint.

c) Preventing al Qaida’s transnational Islamist insurgency from taking root and destabilizing the Muslim states of Central Asia.

This Asian NATO would include Australia, New Zealand, India, China, Russia, South Korea, The United States and Japan as the ” Leviathan ” members and bring in the smaller or poorer states like Singapore or Thailand in as ” System Administration” contributors under the the protection of the organization. Regional security would be the focus but the organization could easily put pressure on states like Indonesia and Pakistan to reform in order to qualify for membership.

Since mutual suspicion and a history of weak regional international entities ( SEATO anyone ?) must be overcome the Bush administration could use the same strategy that Acheson and Truman used with the Schumann Plan for a European Coal-Steel Community that grew into the EU by sponsoring a modest advisory security and cooperation organization that could become the cornerstone of an Asian NATO.

2. CONCLUDE A TREATY FOR A FREE TRADE ZONE OF THE AMERICAS

Momentum for a ” Super-NAFTA” have stalled in recent years but the economic logic remains for what would become the largest free trade zone in the world. The Bush administration is correct to be advancing piecemeal, in the manner of Cordell Hull, nation by nation what could not be gotten in one grand hemispheric bargain.

Such an agreement would set up two subsequent possibilities for future administrations. A dollar-based currency union that would be attractive to Latin American nations that already peg to the dollar or seek to hold the line against inflation and an inter-bloc ” North Atlantic Free Trade Zone ” with the EU.

3. FOUND A MIDDLE-EASTERN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Perhaps as a subsidiary of the IMF that would encourage economic development with an eye to promoting private markets, transparency, reduction in tariffs and environmental management ( particularly water resources and desalination) on a regional planning basis.

Formally linking this new organization to long-established international monetary institutions would enhance its credibility and independence while insulating it somewhat from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Middle-Eastern political and ” bazaari ” business culture that is inhibiting market function and development.

4. CREATE A PERMANENT AFRICAN HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION FORCE

Africa has the greatest problems of any region inside the Gap ranging from nasty civil wars, failed states, dictatorships, famine, disease, genocide, poverty, kleptocracy and the world’s highest HIV infection rates. While a permanent intervention force could only be effective if used to address one acute problem at a time, there usualy is at least one problem of significant magnitude in Africa at any given moment that screams for international crisis intervention.

The Humanitarian Intervention Force could consist of say, three divisions of highly mobile Aircav and Paratroops and an umbrella ” Peace Corps ” type, System administration organization 2-3 times that size to assist coordinate and facilitate the relief efforts of international agencies and NGO’s. Intervention decisions might be left in the hands of the UNSC in consultation with the OAU or NATO, perhaps with ” trigger” requirements so that cases of genocide can no longer be swept under the rug.

5. MAKE THE INFORMATION REVOLUTION A GLOBAL COMMONS

This is not a call for government control of the internet, far from it, but a subsidizaton of making wireless, unimpeded and extremely inexpensive access to online communication and secure monetary transactions ubiquitous. This means a system where a person living in a Gap regime that seeks to control access via gatekeepers, censorship and coercion only needs pocket-sized piece of hardware to link up to the free world. It also means the United States determinedly thwarting UN, EU or statist regime attempts to contract international conventions to preserve and extend gatekeeping controls and taxation to the internet

Thursday, February 17th, 2005

BLOGGING, FREEDOM AND THE FOURTH ESTATE

I don’t often write on strictly domestic issues but I heavily trend toward the libertarian end of the spectrum on the Bill of Rights. I found this essay by Bruce Kesler on the Media, public support for the 1st amendment and blogging to be stimulating.

Thursday, February 17th, 2005

NATIONAL SECURITY ASSESSMENT RESOURCE AND COMPANION BLOG

One of the nicest things about developing a niche of specialization ( vertical action) in the blogosphere is that you then start to attract intelligent responses from a wider variety of fields ( horizontal reaction). I’ve established this relationship with Tom Barnett and Geitner Simmons and Zenpundit is now attracting similar quality connections of its own. Generally, it is my policy not to quote on my blog on what is emailed to me unless I have at least the reader’s implied consent to do so though I have accepted reader suggestions for topics from time to time ( I’m still working on Jacob H.’s Wohlstetter post- a lot to read there before I start writing) with Dave Schuyler as my most frequent email goad to good blogging discussions. Dan at tdaxp too asks some great questions that spur thinking.

I’m pleased therefore to have such permission and draw your attention to CITAR – The Center for Independent Threat Analysis and Research as well as its official blog run by Regan Walker, both of which I’m certain will prove to be a valuable resource for your own analytical efforts. CITAR meshes nicely with the PNM concept; Walker writes that:

” Currently I am working up a concept system for aggregating, formatting, storing, analyzing and plotting all events and occurrences using “filters” of globalization (security, economic, political, cultural, environmental, technological). This system will allow any user to look through historical and real-time data to make horizontal inferences about the events, where they may lead and how seemingly unrelated events can effect one another.”

A worthy intellectual project.

CITAR is also soliciting for article contributions for those of you interested in national security threat assessment ( I may submit one myself in the future, assuming I can get my head above water at work while meeting my present writing commitment to The Rule-Set Reset). Expect both sites to appear on my blogroll soon.


Switch to our mobile site