zenpundit.com » 2006 » August

Archive for August, 2006

Monday, August 7th, 2006

ON A NON-SERIOUS BUT HIGHLY AMUSING NOTE

From Curzon at Coming Anarchy:

Fear and Loathing at the Jersey Shore

“I haven’t been to the boardwalk since high school, and now I know what kept me away. I felt bewildered amongst the legions of tattooed frat-boys and tubby g-stringed girls. The fusion cuisine is some of the worst in the world (see final photo). Americans are now so universally fat that no one is ashamed to let it all hang loose. Yes, Jersey boardwalk culture is America at it’s worst: a circus of ethnically indistinguishable lard buckets chugging high-fructose corn syrup beverages at tail-gate parties out of their Hummers. Americans, welcome to your future.”

A rant worthy of Collounsbury.

Monday, August 7th, 2006

COUNTERINSURGENCY

Once a generally ignored topic reserved for an obscure corner of strategic studies and military history ( itself a classic subfield that professional academics enamored by questions of class, gender, race, social constructions and related concepts have tried to eliminate from departments everywhere) COIN is now going mainstream.

Dr. Peter Howard at Duck of Minerva – “Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice

Counterinsurgency, by the Book” – The New York Times.

Baghdad’s Chaos Undercuts Tack Pursued by U.S” – The New York Times .

The Tribal way of War” – Robert D. KaplanThe Wall Street Journal.

“Is US using enemy to fight a proxy war?” The London Times .

Policy think tanks re-thinking views on local warlords” – The Washington Times .

A big hat tip to The Small Wars Council.

Friday, August 4th, 2006

UNPLUGGED

Going on a short trip and I’m disconnecting from the internet. Overdue respite. Be back on Sunday. Everyone have a great weekend !

Friday, August 4th, 2006

HEZBOLLAH AS A MILITARY FORCE

There’s some debate in the military community as how to best categorize Hezbollah as a fighting force. “Normal” guerillas ? 4GW ? A hybrid ? It is a testament to Hezbollah’s internal security and operational focus that today we have a far better understanding of al Qaida’s structure, capabilities and planning paradigms than we do the inner workings of the military wing of Lebanon’s radical Shiite “Party of God”.

Here is a survey of Hezbollah military prowess for would be military analysts to chew on, courtesy of The Jamestown Foundation. An excerpt:

Hezbollah’s military leadership has rethought much of the strategic and tactical doctrine that led to the repeated defeat of Arab regular forces by the IDF. The top-down command structure that inhibited initiative in junior ranks has been reversed. Hezbollah operates with a decentralized command structure that allows for rapid response to any situation by encouraging initiative and avoiding the need to consult with leaders in Beirut. The military wing nevertheless answers directly to Hezbollah’s central council of clerics for direction.

The fighters are armed with Kalashnikov assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades, typically assembling in small teams to avoid concentrations that would draw Israeli attention. The preparation of well-disguised explosive devices has become a specialty of Hezbollah. The uncertainty created by such weapons takes a heavy psychological toll on patrolling soldiers.

Hezbollah has improved its night-vision capabilities, although they do not compare with Israel’s state-of-the-art equipment, which includes UAVs, helicopters and jet-fighters equipped for night warfare. Hezbollah fighters are well-trained in the use of complex weapons systems. Air defense units use SA-7 missiles and ZU-23 anti-aircraft guns on flatbed trucks.

The guerrillas rigorously examine the success or failure of each operation after completion. Tactics change constantly and new uses are sought for existing weapons. The use of mortars (81mm and 120mm) has been honed to near perfection. Hezbollah fighters have developed efficient assault tactics for use against armor, with their main anti-tank weapons being AT-3 Saggers and AT-4 Spigot missiles. Four tanks were destroyed in two weeks in 1997 using U.S.-made TOW anti-tank missiles (these missiles traveled from Israel to Iran as part of the Iran-Contra affair before being supplied to Hezbollah).

Hezbollah leaders believe that their fighters have a perspective on conflict losses that gives them an inherent advantage; according to Naim Kassem, deputy leader of Hezbollah, “[The Israeli] perspective is preservation of life, while our point of departure is preservation of principle and sacrifice. What is the value of a life of humiliation?” (Haaretz, December 15, 1996). With no hope of overwhelming Israel’s well-supplied military, Hezbollah fighters concentrate on inflicting Israeli casualties, believing that an inability or unwillingness to absorb steady losses is Israel’s strategic weakness.

Read the whole thing here. ( Hat Tip Small Wars Council)

LINKS:

Dr. Thomas P.M. Barnett – “Demonizing Israel will come back to haunt us

Dr. Chet Richards – Reason interview

Ralph Peters – ” CAN ISRAEL WIN? : NOT THE WAY IT’S FIGHTING

John Robb – “THE SECRETS OF HEZBOLLAH’S SUCCESS

William Lind – “Welcome to My Parlor

Jane’s – “IDF setback at Bint Jbeil

DEBKAfile – “Israel’s Surprise Raid of Baalbek Is No Panacea for Tactical Ills

I include the last due to it’s widely presumed association and status as the unofficial mouthpiece for Israeli intelligence agencies.

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006

MORE ON THE MEDICI EFFECT

Dr. Von had an interesting post today on the growing trend toward taking a consilient approach in the sciences, one that takes advantage of the Medici Effect:

“In modern scientific research, we find more and more often groups put together in a very multidisciplinary way. What can happen from a mix of people who are trained in a variety of fields is often rapid progress and new findings, and has been referred to as the Medici effect. Recently, a panel was put together to discuss and make recommendations to Congress about the future of American high energy physics. The U.S., which has been at the forefront of particle physics for decades, will lose its lead when the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is commissioned in 2007 at CERN. The LHC will replace Fermilab as the world’s most powerful accelerator, and numerous American physicists will center their research overseas (they have been doing so in larger and larger numbers for the past 8-10 years already).

Since 2004, a panel (EPP2010) was put together by the National Research Council, following a request by the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, to set the course for U.S. high energy physics. Their report came out this past April. What is interesting about the panel, though, beyond their final report and recommendations, is the make-up of the panel. In the past, advisory panels consisted of high energy physicists and some administrators of national labs. This time around, knowing that our loss of the lead in this type of research was a certainty for many years to come, the NRC took a new approach and formed a multidisciplinary panel. The chair was Harold Shapiro, an economist and president emeritus of Princeton, and the other members included 3 Nobel winners (2 in physics, 1 in medicine), an astronomer, a former CEO of a technology firm, a former director of Brookaven National Lab, a former White House OMB official (expert in budgets), a former Presidential science advisor, a condensed amtter physicist, and then several high energy experts. “

Read Von’s post in full.


Switch to our mobile site