{"id":11723,"date":"2012-07-24T11:57:52","date_gmt":"2012-07-24T11:57:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=11723"},"modified":"2012-07-24T11:57:52","modified_gmt":"2012-07-24T11:57:52","slug":"swj-manea-interviews-fernando-lujan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=11723","title":{"rendered":"SWJ: Manea interviews Fernando Lujan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The latest in the series of <strong>COIN<\/strong> interviews by <strong>Octavian Manea<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/smallwarsjournal.com\/jrnl\/art\/coin-and-other-four-letter-words-interview-with-afpak-hand-major-fernando-lujan\">COIN and Other Four-Letter Words: Interview with AfPak Hand Major Fernando Lujan<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>OM:\u00a0 In early 2009, I made a tour of a few DC think tanks. \u00a0At the time everybody was talking about COIN. Why did COIN become a dirty word, today? Why do you still believe in COIN doctrine?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>FL:\u00a0 Well, frankly I get a bit nervous whenever\u00a0I hear the words &#8220;believe&#8221; and &#8220;doctrine&#8221; in the same sentence&#8230; the same way I get nervous when I hear people refer to the current counterinsurgency manual, FM 3-24, as &#8220;the good book.&#8221;\u00a0 The counterinsurgency manual should never be dogma, never be seen as some sort of universal solution.\u00a0 The manual was an attempt to change the culture of the Army at a time when we desperately needed it.\u00a0 It was written by a group of very smart people who tried to include some lessons from Cold War-era insurgencies, but let&#8217;s not fool ourselves&#8211;it was written\u00a0<em>in extremis<\/em>, for forces struggling through their rotations in Iraq from 2006-2010.\u00a0 It did a pretty good job helping those units.. and it serves as a decent framework for one type of counterinsurgency effort&#8211;the resource intensive, &#8216;boots heavy&#8217; sort that we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0But we should not lose sight of the fact that this type of massive COIN effort is only one extreme of a long continuum of policy options, undertaken when the situation in both countries had already deteriorated so much that major reinforcement became the &#8216;least bad&#8217; choice in the minds of our civilian leaders.\u00a0 If we want to keep COIN from becoming a &#8216;dirty word,&#8217; as you say, we need to make this distinction clear, and leave room for alternate, smaller footprint models.\u00a0 The next\u00a0version of the doctrine\u00a0should not just pull lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan&#8211;but also from\u00a0Colombia, the Philippines, El Salvador, the Sahel, and the myriad of other\u00a0places we&#8217;ve been involved in over the past decades.\u00a0 To the credit of the Army and Marines, Ft. Leavenworth is in the midst of rewriting the manual as we speak&#8211;but it remains to be seen what kind of message the final product will send.\u00a0 Will we have a cookie cutter model with the five standard lines of effort,\u00a0built around heavy resources and a 5,000-man brigade combat team\u00a0or will we have a manual that offers a broad toolkit of different approaches&#8211;some civilian-led or embassy &#8216;country team&#8217; based, some more heavily reliant on targeting and offshore training or 3rd party actors, et cetera.\u00a0 Knowing what we know about land wars in Asia, I&#8217;d personally much rather see the latter&#8230;..<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Read the rest <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/smallwarsjournal.com\/jrnl\/art\/coin-and-other-four-letter-words-interview-with-afpak-hand-major-fernando-lujan\">here<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The latest in the series of COIN interviews by Octavian Manea: COIN and Other Four-Letter Words: Interview with AfPak Hand Major Fernando Lujan\u00a0 OM:\u00a0 In early 2009, I made a tour of a few DC think tanks. \u00a0At the time everybody was talking about COIN. Why did COIN become a dirty word, today? Why do [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,126,471,78,199,336,162,530,161,605,13,18,217],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-coin","category-counterinsurgency","category-cultural-intelligence","category-ideas","category-insurgency","category-intellectuals","category-small-wars-journal","category-strategy-and-war","category-swj-blog","category-tactics","category-theory","category-war","category-warriors"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11723"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11723\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11724,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11723\/revisions\/11724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}