{"id":1208,"date":"2005-05-15T04:03:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-15T04:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=1208"},"modified":"2005-05-15T04:03:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-15T04:03:00","slug":"1208","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=1208","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>PART I &#8211; A PREFACE TO A DISCUSSION OF RULE-SET THEORY<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hello.com\/\" target=\"ext\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px\" alt=\"Posted by Hello\" src=\"http:\/\/photos1.blogger.com\/pbh.gif\" align=\"absMiddle\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Recently, <a href=\"http:\/\/tdaxp.blogspirit.com\/\"><strong>Dan of tdaxp<\/strong> <\/a>was kind of enough <a href=\"http:\/\/tdaxp.blogspirit.com\/archive\/2005\/05\/08\/politely_criticizing_zen_pundit_on_rule_sets.html\">to do a thorough review<\/a> of my article on Rule-Set theory that was published in<a href=\"http:\/\/www.newrulesets.com\/journals\/Rule-SetResetFebruary2005.pdf\"> the first issue of The Rule-Set Reset<\/a>. Dan asked many good questions and raised lots of issues and after reading his review, I thought I owed him a detailed response. I intend to tackle Dan&#8217;s questions directly in Part II. after giving some background information on how my article originally came about.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.thomaspmbarnett.com\/weblog\/\"><strong>Dr. Barnett<\/strong> <\/a>had hired\/partnered with <strong>Dr. Bob Jacobson<\/strong> to have Bob publish RSR and from conversation and innumerable email exchanges Bob indicated that one purpose of RSR would be to develop Rule-Set Theory as an operating paradigm for analysis. Shooting ideas back and forth before I started writing and then during the editing process we came to a point where we conceived of Rule-Sets as a series of concentric circles, with the smaller circles subject to the earlier, broader Rule-sets &#8211; ultimately in the center would stand the individual ( something I can&#8217;t show with my crude grasp of graphics &#8211; face it people, your damn lucky to even have this one &#8211; so I&#8217;m stopping at Explicit Rule-Sets, basically at the nation-state level, just as the article did)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/photos1.blogger.com\/img\/123\/1251\/640\/rule-set.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; MARGIN: 2px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid\" src=\"http:\/\/photos1.blogger.com\/img\/123\/1251\/400\/rule-set.jpg\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Eventually, we were supposed to connect all of these circles through a series of articles in a comprehensive theory of how Rule-Sets govern human interaction but are in turn dynamically evolving due to human action ( at least within those circles that humans can affect since obviously we can&#8217;t change the laws of physics). Bob would have preferred that I had started logically with the outermost circle and work inward but&#8230;well&#8230;and I didn&#8217;t feel quite up to that task being a humble historian rather than a physicist like <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/vonscience.blogspot.com\/\">Dr. Von<\/a><\/strong>. So I decided to write an article on an aspect of Rule-Set theory that was &#8221; closer to home&#8221; in terms of my intellectual comfort zone. <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/systemperturbations.com\/\">Critt <\/a><\/strong>liked it at any rate even if Bob had some reservations.<\/p>\n<p>With RSR as dead as Julius Caesar, it&#8217;s not terribly likely that Rule-Set Theory will go much further along these lines unless Dr. Barnett decides to pick up that ball and run with it in some fashion. We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see what he wants to do. So there you have it, some PNM inside baseball.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PART I &#8211; A PREFACE TO A DISCUSSION OF RULE-SET THEORY Recently, Dan of tdaxp was kind of enough to do a thorough review of my article on Rule-Set theory that was published in the first issue of The Rule-Set Reset. Dan asked many good questions and raised lots of issues and after reading his [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}