{"id":1537,"date":"2005-11-27T16:38:00","date_gmt":"2005-11-27T16:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=1537"},"modified":"2005-11-27T16:38:00","modified_gmt":"2005-11-27T16:38:00","slug":"1537","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=1537","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ? RECOMMENDED READING AND COMMENTARY:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Dave Schuler<\/strong> of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglitteringeye.com\/\"><strong>The Glittering Eye<\/strong> <\/a>set off a blogospheric dialogue on the prospect of withdrawing from Iraq &#8211; all thoughtful and considered arguments from the participants:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/theglitteringeye.com\/?p=1530\">Discussing Withdrawal From Iraq<\/a>&#8221; by <strong>Dave Schuler<\/strong><br \/><strong><\/strong><br \/>&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.windsofchange.net\/archives\/007776.php#comments\">Thoughts on Withdrawal<\/a>&#8221; by<strong> Dan Darling <\/strong>at <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.windsofchange.net\/\">Winds Of Change<\/a><\/strong><br \/><strong><\/strong><br \/>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.caerdroia.org\/blog\/archives\/2005\/11\/staying_the_cou.html\">Staying the Course and Paying for it<\/a>&#8221; by<strong> Jeff Medcalf<\/strong> at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.caerdroia.org\/blog\/\"><strong>Caerdroia<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.qando.net\/details.aspx?entry=2993\">The Political Reality of Troop Withdrawals<\/a>&#8221; by <strong>McQ<\/strong> at<a href=\"http:\/\/www.qando.net\/\"> QandO<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.captainsquartersblog.com\/mt\/archives\/005841.php\">Biden, Democrats Ask The Wrong Questions<\/a>&#8221; by<strong> Ed Morrissey<\/strong> of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.captainsquartersblog.com\/mt\/\">Captain&#8217;s Quarters<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color:#cc0000;\">Additional Related Links<\/span><\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/globalguerrillas.typepad.com\/globalguerrillas\/2005\/11\/the_controlled_.html\">The Controlled Chaos Exit From Iraq<\/a>&#8221; by <strong>John Robb<\/strong> at <a href=\"http:\/\/globalguerrillas.typepad.com\/globalguerrillas\/\">Global Guerillas<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.juancole.com\/2005\/11\/iraqi-guerrillas-made-key-demands-of.html\">Iraqi Guerillas Make Key Demands of CIA at Cairo Conference<\/a>&#8221; by <strong>Juan Cole<\/strong> at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.juancole.com\/\">Informed Comment<\/a><\/p>\n<p>My best forecast is that the United States will make a partial withdrawal from Iraq because the U.S military absolutely requires it at the current level of force structure, regardless of the situation in the Sunni Triangle. We&#8217;ll probably do a mix of deal-cutting, unleashing of the loyalist paramilitaries and reducing to a heavy-duty &#8221; sledgehammer&#8221; force to hang in the background and support our Iraqi allies.<\/p>\n<p>The post-Cold War demobilization that occurred during the Clinton and first Bush administration set a force level that was inadequate for the United States to carry out any of its presumed global responsibilities other than short-term MOOTW operations and bombing the hell out of some rogue state by air. Never mind fighting 2.5 or 1.5 wars at once, we&#8217;re having grevious personnel rotation trouble with just one.<\/p>\n<p>The mismatch of potential missions with the size of American ground forces is not accidental either but a deliberate policy of politicians from both parties who saw a pot of money in 1990 to use for other things but did not care to admit that slashing the Army from 18 to 12 active-duty divisions also meant changing our strategic expectations for using the Army. A policy of unreality cheerfully continued by the Bush administration for reasons both good ( force the Pentagon to transform) and bad ( it costs money without paying political dividends).<\/p>\n<p>We forget that with an economy 25 % smaller in terms of GDP, the United States once easily afforded parking 300,000 troops in West Germany alone, a mere 15 years ago. So our current dilemma is a matter more of political choice than wallet but the problem cannot be fixed except over a period of several years, so we are left pretty much with employing the paramilitaries alongside an American counterinsurgency effort or giving up.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/11\/26\/AR2005112601211.html\">The loyalist paramilitaries are chomping at the bit, arguing that fire can only be fought with a fire that Washington does not have the stomach to do itself<\/a>. They&#8217;re probably correct &#8211; the insurgency can be defeated militarily ( or significantly degraded) but not without getting your hands dirty by slaughtering (or at least jailing) Sunni clansmen en masse until the insurgent networks collapse. It&#8217;s a pragmatically ruthless tactic with a record of success in strangling guerilla armies that goes back to the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Second_Boer_War\">Boer War<\/a>, but it requires a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Horatio_Kitchener,_1st_Earl_Kitchener\">Lord Kitchener <\/a>type leader to carry it out and is exceedingly difficult to do and still look like you are the guy wearing a &#8221; white hat&#8221;. (Though, perhaps if Zarqawi , whose Qaida Iraq group Juan Cole reports as being &#8221; fabulously wealthy&#8221;, assists us by ramping up his own level of ghoulish atrocities, it isn&#8217;t impossible).<\/p>\n<p>President Bush, for good or ill, is no Lord Kitchener and even winning on the battlefield this way becomes meaningless unless America also wins in the &#8220;moral&#8221; and &#8220;political&#8221; spheres in Iraq. Indeed, the Boer war was won by Great Britain militarily, British &#8221; paramountcy&#8221; in the Cape was preserved by bringing the Afrikaaner states into the empire, but the political costs were very high. Arguably, the Boer War weakened Britain&#8217;s hold over &#8221; the white dominions&#8221; and left the British Empire less willing or able to face up to looming strategic challenges, economic or military.<\/p>\n<p>An outcome the United States cannot afford.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ? RECOMMENDED READING AND COMMENTARY: Dave Schuler of The Glittering Eye set off a blogospheric dialogue on the prospect of withdrawing from Iraq &#8211; all thoughtful and considered arguments from the participants: &#8220;Discussing Withdrawal From Iraq&#8221; by Dave Schuler&#8221; Thoughts on Withdrawal&#8221; by Dan Darling at Winds Of Change&#8220;Staying the Course and Paying [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1537"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1537\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}