{"id":16518,"date":"2012-11-11T21:36:56","date_gmt":"2012-11-11T21:36:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=16518"},"modified":"2012-11-11T21:38:50","modified_gmt":"2012-11-11T21:38:50","slug":"cross-grain-thinking-2-mapping-the-jihadist-mind-aqs-3-spot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=16518","title":{"rendered":"Cross-grain thinking, 2: mapping the jihadist mind & AQ’s #3 spot"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ by Charles Cameron<\/strong> — the different types of “leaders” should give us an idea of the different mental operations in play in the individual minds of the led, as well as the “mind” of the organization — plus fun ]
\n.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

credit for mind map aspect of composite image to valdis krebs<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n

.<\/p>\n

Okay, I made my basic point here quite nicely in that little tag-line that gives you the brief overview of each of my posts right next to my name, so I’ll just repeat it here, very slightly amplified for focus:<\/p>\n

The different types of “leaders” we identify in AQ should give us an idea of the different mental operations usually in play in the individual minds of jihadists, as well as within the “mind” of the organization itself.<\/b><\/font><\/p>\n

I tried to show how cross-grain thinking in general, and thinking that includes both “subjective” and “objective” realities specifically, might play a considerable role in understanding some pressing contemporary issues in my recent post<\/a> on Mozart<\/strong> — a figure so removed from those problems that some of you may have skipped it. Here’s my ending, with the Mozart details safely removed:<\/p>\n

I think we should track that pattern, know as much as we can of that pattern, write the biography of the way in which some piece of music weaves between inspiration and thought, composer and instrument, mind and matter, performer and audience, studio and home digital music center\u2026<\/p>\n

Then, perhaps, we could begin to map other patterns \u2013 in some ways simpler and more urgent ones.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The sorts of “simpler and more urgent” patterns I was thinking of there include:<\/p>\n

\n
  • how discussions become deliberations and deliberations decisions\n
  • how scenarios are built and understood and sometimes poorly configured to our later detriment\n
  • how foreign policy plus feedback loops can create blowback and how to minimize it..<\/blockquote>\n

    and specifically, <\/p>\n

    \n
  • how the “jihadist” radicalization process moves<\/strong> from floating frustration and shame, via identification of a plausible “other” to rage against, to commitment, then via theology (!!) (for divine sanction of otherwise unpalatable acts) to the recognition of a binding moral obligation (fard ‘ayn<\/em> in AQ terms) — and thence to camps for training in weaponry and the requirements and subtle limitations on Quranically sanctioned war\u2026<\/blockquote>\n

    **<\/p>\n

    That last one has been an interest of mine, sitting in the back of my mind as an unanswered problem, quietly gathering data and forming insights for a while now, under a rubric along the lines of the question:<\/p>\n

    Can we figure out a rough map of the workings of the “typical” mind of a potential jihadist as it radicalizes?<\/strong><\/font><\/p>\n

    It occurs to me that the leadership of an organization likely maps well to the organization\u2019s functions, and those functions to the thought processes in which members are involved so a map of the aspects of leadership may well give us a rough draft of a mind-map for the individual member, including the passage from uninvolved observer to active participant: the process of radicalization.<\/p>\n

    This may seem pretty obvious to some of you, but it\u2019s a fresh idea for me, and to me it\u2019s important because we already map communications networks and organizational flows, but the mind \u2014 the individual mind is one place we don\u2019t seem to go.<\/p>\n

    So I\u2019m thinking in terms of sketching the mind of a \u201cperson\u201d who is in some ways AQ as a whole, considered as if it were one sensate human-like being, filled with the usual variety of thoughts and emotions, ideals and pragmatisms, hopes and fears, hunches and hard data, clarities and confusions.. And I\u2019m thinking of doing this by treating \u201cleaders\u201d as though they were distinct but coordinated processes in a single mind.<\/p>\n

    We track and map people and their connections, we track and map groups and their connections, we track and map communications and their connections \u2014 are we tracking and mapping memes as such? ideas and their connections? minds?<\/p>\n

    If we are already tracking ideas and minds \u2014 or if we aren\u2019t doing that yet, but could \u2014 I\u2019d be on the lookout for possible positive and negative feedback loops within the system, some that enhance the overall operation and could be disrupted, and some that fragment and damage it and could be amplified. <\/p>\n

    So that, among other things, God willing, we could learn better ways to dampen some of the oscillations of hate…<\/p>\n

    **<\/p>\n

    I was looking at a comment in the recent ICSR report, Al-Qaeda at the Crossroads<\/a> [h\/t @azelin], and ran across this quote which struck me from an oblique angle:<\/p>\n

    About ten core leaders have been subsequently killed, including Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, Abu Hafs al-Shahri, Samir Khan, Anwar al-Awlaki, and Abu Yahya al-Libi. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Let’s take a look at these folk: Atiyah Abd al-Rahman<\/strong> was reported via Bill Roggio<\/strong> at Long War Journal<\/a> as al Qaeda’s “operations chief” and a major planning a major attack on the US for the tenth anniverary of 9\/11, as AQ’s “general manager” and bin Laden<\/strong>‘s “chief of staff”. Abu Hafs al-Shahri<\/strong> was another “operations chief”. Samir Khan<\/strong> was a publicist, the editor of the English-language magazine Inspire<\/strong>. Anwar al-Awlaki<\/strong> was a minor theologian with a talent for publicity and a decent understanding of his American audience…<\/p>\n

    And as for Abu Yahya al-Libi<\/strong>, here’s an excerpt from an NYT piece about him<\/a>:”I call him a man for all seasons for A.Q.,” said Jarret Brachman, a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency who is now research director of the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. \u201cHe\u2019s a warrior. He\u2019s a poet. He\u2019s a scholar. He\u2019s a pundit. He\u2019s a military commander. And he\u2019s a very charismatic, young, brash rising star within A.Q., and I think he has become the heir apparent to Osama bin Laden in terms of taking over the entire global jihadist movement.”<\/p>\n

    On that telling, al-Libi alone would be almost enough for my purposes — but let’s go with the whole list. The AQ mindset involves courage, poetry, scholarship, punditry and command and control. Specify that the scholarship needs to include theology (AQ at one point sent al-Libi to Mauretania for advanced Islamic studies) as well as strategy and guerrilla warfare (think Abu Mus’ab al-Suri<\/strong>, who was well-read in Taber<\/strong>\u2019s The War of the Flea<\/em>, Chairman Mao<\/strong>, Che Guevara<\/strong>, and Vo Nguyen Giap<\/strong>), and the significant influences on the jihadist mind begin to swim into focus.<\/p>\n

    **<\/p>\n

    See, I’m nudging my way to something fairly close to the Lincoln<\/strong> mention in Fred Kaplan<\/strong>‘s Slate piece about Petraeus<\/strong><\/a> the other day:<\/p>\n

    Toward the end of the war, as the senior planning aide to Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Marshall, Lincoln realized that the Army needed to breed a new type of officer to help the nation meet its new global responsibilities in the postwar era. This new officer, he wrote to a colleague, should have \u201cat least three heads\u2014one political, one economic, and one military.\u201d He took a demotion, from brigadier general to colonel, so he could return to West Point and create a curriculum \u201cto improve the so-called Army mind\u201d in just this way: a social science department, encouraging critical thinking, even occasionally dissent.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    How would we map these mental processes? How would we map the jihadist’s equivalent?<\/p>\n

    **<\/p>\n

    While I was fishing around for AQ leadership lists in search of an education, I ran across Robert Mackey<\/strong>‘s amusing piece on his NYT blog back in 2010, titled Eliminating Al Qaeda\u2019s No. 3, Again<\/a>, in which he mentioned as killed or captured claimants to the #3 spot Mustafa Abu al-Yazid<\/strong>, described as “a top financial chief for Al Qaeda” and quotes a colleague as saying “many of Mr. Yazid\u2019s predecessors in Al Qaeda\u2019s No. 3 slot” \u2013 from the Bush years alone, he lists Abu Zubaydah, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Abu Faraj al-Libbi, Hamza Rabia<\/strong> and Saif al-Adel<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    Okay, we should definitely add “financial chief” to my list above.<\/p>\n

    The humorist and the artist in me often lead the more serious analyst in me to insights I’d not otherwise have access to, and since I’m worrying away at the notion that analysis needs to feature both “interior” (mind, heart) and “external” (world) realities, I keep the artistry and humor in my analyses, and hope that makes them more rather than less accessible — so let’s run with the AQ#3 nonsense for a bit.<\/p>\n

    Mackey’s is a slightly tongue in cheek treatment of a reasonably serious topic. On Twitter the humor gets more incisive, with Andy Borowitz<\/strong> claiming 9,000 AQ#3s have been killed, and AQ#3 in person<\/strong> setting up a twitter account and tweeting merrily away for a while, see the two sample tweets in this SPECS graphic:<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

    My sources for those two tweets were Bupbin<\/a><\/strong> and AlQaedaNumber3<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    To be honest, I find the AQ#3 business<\/strong> both irritating — since it shows how little depth our popular understanding of who we’re dealing with really has — and amusing — because it’s so very ripe for satire…<\/p>\n

    **<\/p>\n

    I’ve been working at this post so long I’m mentally cross-eyed, so feel free to fill me in or chew me out…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    [ by Charles Cameron — the different types of “leaders” should give us an idea of the different mental operations in play in the individual minds of the led, as well as the “mind” of the organization — plus fun ] . . Okay, I made my basic point here quite nicely in that little […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[841,205,526,644,371,716,319,626,473,436,725,687,127,523,1,458],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aaron-zelin","category-al-qaida","category-charles-cameron","category-graphical-thinking","category-humor","category-lwj","category-map","category-patterns","category-propaganda","category-psychology","category-radicalization","category-specs","category-strategy","category-theology","category-uncategorized","category-valdis-krebs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16518"}],"version-history":[{"count":62,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16518\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16898,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16518\/revisions\/16898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}