![\"\"](\"http:\/\/laughingsquid.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Makers_3d_2.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Makers: The New Industrial Revolution<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0by\u00a0Chris Anderson\u00a0<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong>This is a fun book \u00a0by\u00a0the former editor-in-chief of\u00a0WIRED<\/a><\/strong><\/em>\u00a0, author of\u00a0The Long Tail<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>and the co-founder of 3D Robotics<\/a>, Chris Anderson. <\/strong>Part pop culture, part tech-optimist futurism and all DIY business book, Anderson is preaching a revolution, one brought about by the intersection of 3D printing and open source “Maker movement” culture, that he believes will be bigger and more transformative to society than was the Web. One with the potential to change the “race to the bottom” economic logic of globalization by allowing manufacturing entrepreneurs to be smart, small, nimble and global by sharing bits and selling atoms.<\/p>\n Anderson writes:<\/p>\n Here’s the history of two decades of innovation in two sentences: The past ten years have been about discovering new ways to create, invent, and work together on the Web. The next ten years will be about applying those lessons to the real world.<\/strong><\/p>\n This book is about the next ten years.<\/strong><\/p>\n ….Why? Because making things has gone digital: physical objects now begin as designs on screens, and those designs can be shared online as files…..once an industry goes digital in changes in profound ways, as we’ve seen in everything from retail to publishing. The biggest transformation, but in who’s doing it. Once things can be done on regular computers, they can be done by anyone. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing happening in manufacturing.<\/strong><\/p>\n …..In short, the Maker Movement shares three characteristics, \u00a0all of which I’d argue are transformative:<\/strong><\/p>\n 1. People using digital desktop tools to create designs for new products and prototype them (“digital DIY”)<\/strong><\/p>\n 2. A cultural norm to share those designs and collaborate with others in online communities.<\/strong><\/p>\n 3. The use of common design file standards that allow anyone, if they desire, to send their designs to commercial manufacturing services to be produced in any number, just as easily as they can fabricate them on their desktop. This radically foreshortens the path from idea to entrepreneurship, just as the Web did in software, information, and content.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Nations whose entire strategy rests upon being the provider of cheapest labor per unit cost on all scales are going to be in jeopardy if local can innovate, customize and manufacture in near-real time response to customer demand. Creativity of designers and stigmergic<\/a>\u00a0\/stochastic<\/a> collaboration of communities rise in economic value relative to top-down, hierarchical production systems with long development lags and capital tied up betting on having large production runs.<\/p>\n Interesting, with potentially profound implications.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Makers: The New Industrial Revolution\u00a0by\u00a0Chris Anderson\u00a0 This is a fun book \u00a0by\u00a0the former editor-in-chief of\u00a0WIRED\u00a0, author of\u00a0The Long Tail\u00a0and the co-founder of 3D Robotics, Chris Anderson. Part pop culture, part tech-optimist futurism and all DIY business book, Anderson is preaching a revolution, one brought about by the intersection of 3D printing and open source “Maker […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[360,772,420,133,82,791,454,134,346,654,277,215,65,332,260,78,388,336,445,179,381,563,26,220,13,137,235],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-21st-century","category-3-d-printing","category-authors","category-book","category-business","category-change","category-cognitive-goods","category-computers","category-connectivity","category-cooperation","category-corporations","category-culture","category-economic-determinism","category-economics","category-freedom","category-ideas","category-innovation","category-intellectuals","category-reading","category-revolution","category-society","category-stigmergy","category-stochastic","category-tech","category-theory","category-web-20","category-wired"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19209"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19210,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19209\/revisions\/19210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}