{"id":21433,"date":"2013-04-26T23:56:13","date_gmt":"2013-04-26T23:56:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=21433"},"modified":"2013-04-27T00:00:40","modified_gmt":"2013-04-27T00:00:40","slug":"red-lines-and-the-credibility-arms-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=21433","title":{"rendered":"Red lines and the credibility arms race"},"content":{"rendered":"

[The views and opinions expressed here are solely the responsibility of Lynn C. Rees. They may not necessarily reflect the official views or opinions of Zenpundit<\/em>]\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

To deter, Barack Obama has publicly drawn a red line between tolerable and intolerable. We now watch to see and (perhaps<\/em>) learn if open signaling of red lines has deterrent effect.<\/p>\n

Open red lines intended to stave off the intolerable without ending in blows are as ancient as territorial instinct. Red frequents coloration of animals who’ve evolved warning signals embedded in their anatomy. Lines, though marked more by scent or suggested by signal, are also abundant among Man and nature.<\/p>\n

“Bear”, my brother’s late <\/span>Shar-Pei<\/a>, vociferously defended my brother’s chain-linked fence line. All his toing and froing facing down suspicious pedestrians\u00a0even wore a second line into the front lawn that paralleled the fence.\u00a0<\/span>His vigorous bark emerged from wolven ancestors to draw lines red in tooth and claw in wolven mind so it didn’t come to lines red in tooth and claw in wolven reality.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

But, if bluffs are called and barks prove to have more volume than bite, a red line will prove only as\u00a0substantial\u00a0as the bite and fight beyond it. If warning is not credibly conveyed and things fall apart, nothing may remain except bite and fight.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bear’s bark proved a poor red line. While it sounded loud and formidable, when you opened the front gate and entered the yard, Bear would casually mosey up, sniff you, and promptly return to the barking line. Shar Peis are renowned for even-tempers. Bred as guard dogs in China, they often had to be brutalized or drugged into fight and bite. Bear was neither brutalized nor drugged so he lacked credible fierceness.<\/span><\/p>\n

There is no certain calculus in drawing red lines. My calculus teacher wisely taught that variables have only one invariable certainty: they tend to vary<\/em>. Man is not only variable, he is contrary. His contrariness not only votes present, it votes with real impact. If it were otherwise, you’d have a sort of Clausewitzian “red line by algebra: tally up one side of a red line in one column and tally the other side in another column. Then, when clearly displayed in public, those on either side would be forced to agree on how substantial the red line was and openly acknowledge its deterrent psychology.<\/p>\n

Politics, the division of power, varies most in the intensity in which its division of power escalates confrontation toward violence. Some political contestants’ escalation is too hot. Others’ escalation is too cold. For others, their escalation will be just right.\u00a0Some draw red lines and aggressively escalate political intensity based on <\/span>broken red line theory<\/a>: one small crack in your red line, like someone publicly urinating on it, means the entire red line will be stripped down to its bare chassis overnight if small infractions aren’t predictably and promptly punished. Others use them to draw folks along, perhaps as bait, perhaps as stalling tactics, while they do something else somewhere else. Some red lines are implicitly understood by all as being for entertainment purposes only.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, we’re armed with only a few\u00a0<\/span>rules of thumb<\/a>\u00a0to guide us in drawing and escalating red lining, most centered on creating intrinsic credibility:<\/span><\/p>\n