RECOMMENDED READING<\/b><\/p>\n
The nice thing about falling behind on this feature is that good material builds up. Hoo-HA!<\/p>\n
Thomas P.M. Barnett<\/a><\/strong> – “ Managing China’s Ascent<\/a>“<\/p>\n Books are intellectual “auctoritas<\/a>“. The blog is fun. Syndication is nice but op-eds in a few print outlets – The New York Times<\/em><\/strong>, The Washington Post<\/em><\/strong>, Time<\/em><\/strong>, Newsweek<\/em><\/strong> and U.S. News & World Report<\/em><\/strong> – are the big time influencers with the old line establishment. Nice work Tom!<\/p>\n Dan of tdaxp<\/a><\/strong> – “Dreaming 5GW<\/a>“<\/p>\n I was certain that Boyd 2007<\/strong> would spark a new series out of Dan; here he will delve into the intuitive conflict of fifth generation warfare.<\/p>\n Fabius Maximus<\/strong> – “America takes another step towards the \u201cLong War\u201dPart I<\/a>“<\/p>\n Fabius draws a contrast with the start of the Cold War to question some of the operative premises of the GWOT. There is also a sustained critique of the COIN philosophy of LTC. David Kilcullen.<\/strong> Gunnar<\/strong> is one of those guys who deserves to have me link to him more often than I do, a true expert in IT security as well as a Gibson fan ( seems to be a common thread among Zenpundit<\/strong> readers; I am halfway through Neuromancer<\/a><\/em><\/strong>, my first Gibson read)<\/p>\n Daniel Nexon<\/a><\/strong> – “Toward a neo-neo-Reaganite foreign policy<\/a> “<\/p>\n Dr. Nexon, much in demand for Harry Potter interviews these days, critiques Donald Kagan’s<\/strong> grasp of grand strategy, giving both praise and criticism. I like the term “neo-neo-Reganite” too – something to be said for reviving the most effective aspects of Reagan foreign policy. :O)<\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/strong>
1 Raindrop<\/a><\/strong> – “William Gibson Thinks You Should Go to Metricon<\/a>“<\/p>\n