{"id":2883,"date":"2008-09-28T15:50:04","date_gmt":"2008-09-28T15:50:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=2883"},"modified":"2008-09-28T17:03:08","modified_gmt":"2008-09-28T17:03:08","slug":"debating-john-boyd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=2883","title":{"rendered":"Debating John Boyd"},"content":{"rendered":"

At the Small Wars Council<\/a><\/strong>. A thread of great intellectual vigor<\/a>\u00a0sparked by CavGuy<\/strong> reacting to the review by\u00a0Sam Liles<\/strong> <\/a>of The John Boyd Roundtable<\/a>:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Here’s a snippet of my post there:<\/p>\n

There’s been a discussion if Boyd merits being called “the greatest” or a “great” strategist or theorist. I think it’s fair to say that Boyd himself would never have put forth such a claim of that kind or wasted time worrying about what people thought of him or whether he made a more significant contribution to the study of war than Colin Gray or Carl \"boyd31.jpg\"<\/a>von Clausewitz. Boyd was more interested in learning, teaching and discussing conflict (moreso than just “war”) and were he alive, I’m certain Boyd would be delighted with the Small Wars Council and the endless opportunities here for discussion and reflection.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Was he “great”, much less “greatest” ? In his briefs, Boyd was trying to shift the paradigm of American military culture away from linear, analytical-reductionist, mechanistic, deterministic, Newtonian-Taylorist, conceptions that resulted in rote application of attrition-based tactics toward more fluid, alinear, creative -synthesist thinking and holistic consideration of strategy. Give the man his due, in his time these were radical arguments for a Pentagon where the senior brass of the U.S. Army had reacted to the defeat in Vietnam by purging the lessons learned of COIN from the institutional memory of the Defense Department.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

At the Small Wars Council. A thread of great intellectual vigor\u00a0sparked by CavGuy reacting to the review by\u00a0Sam Liles of The John Boyd Roundtable: Here’s a snippet of my post there: There’s been a discussion if Boyd merits being called “the greatest” or a “great” strategist or theorist. I think it’s fair to say that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[338,136,481],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-john-boyd","category-small-wars-council","category-strategist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2883\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}