{"id":3060,"date":"2009-03-25T15:17:34","date_gmt":"2009-03-25T15:17:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3060"},"modified":"2009-03-25T15:17:34","modified_gmt":"2009-03-25T15:17:34","slug":"that-was-fast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3060","title":{"rendered":"That Was Fast"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Recently, <a href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3051#comments\" target=\"_blank\">discussing the media in the comment section<\/a> here, <a href=\"http:\/\/chicagoboyz.net\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Lexington Green<\/strong><\/a> had this to say:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Brilliant Shirkey piece.\u00a0 He only leaves out one thing.\u00a0 The dying incumbents are going to successfully seek money and protection from the government.\u00a0 With a Democrat president and congress, their faithful allies, lickspittles, bootlickers, toadies, buttboys, catamites, lackeys also knows as &#8220;the media&#8221; will come to DC with palm extended, upright, demanding the payment that their partisan loyalty has earned.\u00a0 They will get protection and money.\u00a0<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> .<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> They will not survive that much longer as a result.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In the same thread, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.democraticcore.blogspot.com\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>democratic core<\/strong><\/a> remarked:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>The Shirky piece raises fascinating issues.\u00a0 The question of what the new economic model for journalism will be is interesting, and I appreciate the fact that this piece raises the question explicitly.\u00a0 Contrary to Lexington\u2019s comment, I doubt that there will be a\u00a0government bailout, as the First Amendment issues would seem to make that unpalatable to both parties.\u00a0 The non-profit approach is one logical evolution, where &#8220;newspapers&#8221;, i.e.,\u00a0centers of journalistic activites,\u00a0get absorbed into\u00a0non-profit institutions such as think tanks or universities to provide content to organs of information dissemination.\u00a0 Another model might be the C-span model, where profitable internet organizations such as Google fund the entities we used to call &#8220;newspapers&#8221; in order to provide content for the web.\u00a0 Most likely, you could have some combination of the two, as for example in the way that profit-making organizations subsidize research activities by non-profit institutions such as universities. <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now we have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/politicsNews\/idUSTRE52N67F20090324\" target=\"_blank\">this<\/a>. A remarkable turn-around time:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>WASHINGTON (Reuters) &#8211; With many U.S. newspapers struggling to survive, a Democratic senator on Tuesday introduced a bill to help them by allowing newspaper companies to restructure as nonprofits with a variety of tax breaks.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_1\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>&#8220;This may not be the optimal choice for some major newspapers or corporate media chains but it should be an option for many newspapers that are struggling to stay afloat,&#8221; said Senator Benjamin Cardin.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_2\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>A Cardin spokesman said the bill had yet to attract any co-sponsors, but had sparked plenty of interest within the media, which has seen plunging revenues and many journalist layoffs.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_3\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>Cardin&#8217;s Newspaper Revitalization Act would allow newspapers to operate as nonprofits for educational purposes under the U.S. tax code, giving them a similar status to public broadcasting companies.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_4\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>Under this arrangement, newspapers would still be free to report on all issues, including political campaigns. But they would be prohibited from making political endorsements.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_5\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>Advertising and subscription revenue would be tax exempt, and contributions to support news coverage or operations could be tax deductible.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_6\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>Because newspaper profits have been falling in recent years, &#8220;no substantial loss of federal revenue&#8221; was expected under the legislation, Cardin&#8217;s office said in a statement.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_7\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>Cardin&#8217;s office said his bill was aimed at preserving local and community newspapers, not conglomerates which may also own radio and TV stations. His bill would also let a non-profit buy newspapers owned by a conglomerate.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span id=\"midArticle_8\"><\/span><\/strong><strong>&#8220;We are losing our newspaper industry,&#8221; Cardin said. &#8220;The economy has caused an immediate problem, but the business model for newspapers, based on circulation and advertising revenue, is broken, and that is a real tragedy for communities across the nation and for our democracy.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently, discussing the media in the comment section here, Lexington Green had this to say: Brilliant Shirkey piece.\u00a0 He only leaves out one thing.\u00a0 The dying incumbents are going to successfully seek money and protection from the government.\u00a0 With a Democrat president and congress, their faithful allies, lickspittles, bootlickers, toadies, buttboys, catamites, lackeys also knows [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[185,332,49,139],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-democratic-party","category-economics","category-lexington-green","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3060\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}