{"id":3195,"date":"2009-08-31T03:21:10","date_gmt":"2009-08-31T03:21:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3195"},"modified":"2009-08-31T03:25:27","modified_gmt":"2009-08-31T03:25:27","slug":"recommended-reading-66","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3195","title":{"rendered":"Recommended Reading"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Top Billing!<em>\u00a0<\/em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jcs.mil\/newsarticle.aspx?ID=142\">ADM. Michael Mullen <\/a>&#8211;<\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ndu.edu\/inss\/Press\/jfq_pages\/editions\/i55\/1.pdf\">Strategic Communication: Getting Back to Basics<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Initially, I didn&#8217;t\u00a0care for\u00a0this salvo from the <strong>Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff<\/strong> at all, and\u00a0I was inclined to write a critical post. Then I read it a second time and decided that I was being put off more by some superficial rhetorical flourishes than what were\u00a0the Admiral&#8217;s\u00a0main <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" align=\"right\" width=\"184\" src=\"http:\/\/farm2.static.flickr.com\/1352\/966197983_1b1c0ac8dd.jpg?v=0\" height=\"244\" \/>substantive points, with which I essentially agreed. Admiral Mullen also deserves credit for modeling intellectual leadership by putting his own\u00a0ideas into the arena rather than relying upon public affairs officers\u00a0to issue bland statements in his name. This is <strong><u>exactly<\/u><\/strong> what we should see from our senior military officers &#8211; <strong><u>leadership<\/u><\/strong>!<\/p>\n<p>That said, I will add that the earlier, historical, &#8220;natural&#8221;, synchronicity between word and deed to which Mullen alluded was because the United States operated from a coherent <strong>grand strategy<\/strong>, first the <strong>Open Door Policy<\/strong>\u00a0and then after WWII, the <strong>Atlantic Charter<\/strong> and <strong>Containment Doctrine<\/strong>. We do not have any comparable elite consensus over grand strategy today which is (partially)\u00a0why we have a mismatch between our\u00a0message and our actions.<\/p>\n<p>Some reactions<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/billpetti.com\/2009\/08\/28\/signaling-and-communication\/\"> here<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/08\/28\/world\/28military.html?ref=world\">here<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cnas.org\/blogs\/abumuqawama\/2009\/08\/mullen-its-still-pig.html\">here<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/attackerman.firedoglake.com\/2009\/08\/28\/strategic-communications-not-always-vapid-cynical-bullshit\/\">here<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cnas.org\/blogs\/abumuqawama\/2009\/08\/mullen-its-still-pig-part-ii.html\">here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Esquire<\/em><\/strong> <strong>(<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.thomaspmbarnett.com\/weblog\/\">Thomas PM Barnett<\/a>) &#8211;<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.esquire.com\/the-side\/war-room\/cia-report-on-torture-082709\">Obama Targets Jack Bauer, but Who Takes the Fall<strong>?<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>World Politics Review<\/em><\/strong> <strong>(<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/globalguerrillas.typepad.com\/\">John Robb<\/a>)<\/strong> &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldpoliticsreview.com\/article.aspx?id=4203\">Risk and Resilience in a Globalized Age: Containing Chaos<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Fast Company<\/em><\/strong> <strong>-(<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.openthefuture.com\/\">Jamais Cascio<\/a>)<\/strong> &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fastcompany.com\/blog\/jamais-cascio\/open-future\/three-possible-economic-models-part-1\">Three Possible Economic Models<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.fastcompany.com\/blog\/jamais-cascio\/open-future\/three-possible-economic-models-part-ii\">Three Possible Economic Models (Part II)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Tom, John and Jamais are staple reads for me. <strong>Dr. Barnett<\/strong> analyzes the Obama administration&#8217;s Hamelt-like effort to deconstruct the <strong>CIA&#8217;s<\/strong> clandestine division\u00a0over Bush-era harsh interrogation-sliding into-torture. <strong>Robb<\/strong> and <strong>Cascio<\/strong> are engaged in very complementary,\u00a0scenario\/paradigm based futurism. Speaking of using scenarios, anyone hear from <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/cartegic.typepad.com\/\"><strong>Art Hutchinson<\/strong> <\/a>lately? His expertise is missed in the strategic blogosphere.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Federal Computer Week<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0 <strong>(Mark Drapeau)<\/strong> &#8211;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fcw.com\/articles\/2009\/08\/24\/comment-drapeau.aspx\"> Social-media bans miss the mark<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.markdrapeau.com\/\">Dr. Mark Drapeau<\/a><\/strong> is becoming the Gov 2.0 go to guru inside the Beltway. Follow him on twitter at <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/cheeky_geeky\">@cheeky_geeky <\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Zero Intelligence Agents<\/strong><em> &#8211;<\/em> <a rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/www.drewconway.com\/zia\/?p=1251\" title=\"Permanent Link to What's Wrong with the \u2018Terrorist Facebook'\">What&#8217;s Wrong with the \u2018Terrorist Facebook&#8217; <\/a><\/p>\n<p>Excellent\u00a0methodological take-down by <strong>Drew<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>MountainRunner<\/strong> &#8211; <a rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/mountainrunner.us\/2009\/08\/humpt_dumpty.html\">Pushing Humpty Dumpty: the rebuilding of State<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Agree with <strong>Matt<\/strong>.<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=2960\"> State needs rebuilding<\/a>, not a paint job<strong>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Coming Anarchy<\/strong> &#8211; <a rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/cominganarchy.com\/2009\/08\/30\/4821\/\" title=\"Permanent Link to The Party's Over\">The Party&#8217;s Over<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Curzon<\/strong> on Japan&#8217;s election which\u00a0has ended in a stunning landslide for the opposition.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ralph Peters &#8211;<\/strong>\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.army.mil\/-news\/2009\/07\/31\/25310-trapping-ourselves-in-afghanistan-and-losing-focus-on-the-essential-mission\/index.html\">Trapping Ourselves in Afghanistan and Losing Focus on the Essential Mission<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Peters takes a break from his recent batshit insane televised meltdown to offer a cogent but ultimately flawed critique.<\/p>\n<p><strong>USNI Blog (FFry)\u00a0&#8211;<\/strong> <a rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/blog.usni.org\/?p=4103\" title=\"Permanent Link to \u2018Rescued' Cargo Ship ARCTIC SEA Hijacked by the Russian Navy?\">\u2018Rescued&#8217; Cargo Ship ARCTIC SEA Hijacked by the Russian Navy?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Weird.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SWJ Blog (Adam Elkus)<\/strong> &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/smallwarsjournal.com\/blog\/2009\/08\/complexity-defense-policy-and\/\">Complexity, Defense Policy, and Epistemological Failure<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Senor Elkus<\/strong>, en fuego.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\/Message<\/strong> &#8211; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stoweboyd.com\/message\/2009\/08\/the-war-on-flow-2009.html\">The War On Flow, 2009: Why Studies About Multitasking Are Missing The Point<\/a>\u00a0(Hat tip<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.margolin-consulting.com\/\"> <strong>Jessica Margolin<\/strong><\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Nice. It&#8217;s the yardstick, stupid. Shrewd dude.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Eide Neurolearning Blog &#8211;<\/strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com\/2009\/08\/positive-psychology-hits-classroom.html\">Positive Psychology Hits the Classroom<\/a><\/p>\n<p>We will be hearing more about\u00a0positive educational psychology\u00a0due to an obscure (to the public) Federal education mandate known as <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Response_to_intervention\">RtI<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>The New York Times<\/em> (Motoko Rich)<\/strong>\u00a0&#8211; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/08\/30\/books\/30reading.html?_r=1\">The Future of Reading A New Assignment: Pick Books You Like<\/a>\u00a0 (Hat tip <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/hiddenunities.wordpress.com\/\">Eddie<\/a><\/strong>)<\/p>\n<p>As with many things, what is needed here is not either-or, but the sweet spot of &#8220;both&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Scientific American<\/em><\/strong> &#8211;\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article.cfm?id=the-mysterious-downfall\" title=\"Feature\">The Mysterious Downfall of the Neandertals<\/a><\/p>\n<p>What happened to the &#8220;h&#8221;? SCIAM now requires a subscription to view content so this will probably my last link to them &#8211; enjoy your walled garden guys, as your online traffic devolves to about 20 % of your print subscribers.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Top Billing!\u00a0ADM. Michael Mullen &#8211; Strategic Communication: Getting Back to Basics Initially, I didn&#8217;t\u00a0care for\u00a0this salvo from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at all, and\u00a0I was inclined to write a critical post. Then I read it a second time and decided that I was being put off more by some superficial rhetorical [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-recommended-reading","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}