{"id":3348,"date":"2010-02-25T05:16:02","date_gmt":"2010-02-25T05:16:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3348"},"modified":"2010-02-26T05:52:34","modified_gmt":"2010-02-26T05:52:34","slug":"arquilla-on-the-new-rules-of-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3348","title":{"rendered":"Arquilla on the New Rules of War"},"content":{"rendered":"

John Arqilla<\/a><\/strong>, along with David Ronfeldt<\/a><\/strong>, was\u00a0the pioneering military and security theorist\u00a0who forseaw the rise of networked non-state adversaries, which they detailed in their now classic book,\u00a0Networks and Netwars<\/a><\/strong>. Below, in a Foreign Policy<\/em><\/strong> <\/a>mag article,\u00a0Arquilla expounds on the failure of the Pentagon to adapt sufficiently to leverage the power of networks or counter those opponents who have done so.<\/p>\n

The New Rules of War
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

When militaries don’t keep up with the pace of change, countries suffer. In World War I, the failure to grasp the implications of mass production led not only to senseless slaughter, but also to the end of great empires and the bankruptcy of others. The inability to comprehend the meaning of mechanization at the outset of World War II handed vast tracts of territory to the Axis powers and very nearly gave them victory. The failure to grasp the true meaning of nuclear weapons led to a suicidal arms race and a barely averted apocalypse during the Cuban missile crisis.
\n\u00a0
\nToday, the signs of misunderstanding still abound. For example, in an age of supersonic anti-ship missiles, the U.S. Navy has spent countless billions of dollars on “surface warfare ships” whose aluminum superstructures will likely burn to the waterline if hit by a single missile. Yet Navy doctrine calls for them to engage missile-armed enemies at eyeball range in coastal waters.
\n\u00a0
\nThe U.S. Army, meanwhile, has spent tens of billions of dollars on its “Future Combat Systems,” a grab bag of new weapons, vehicles, and communications gadgets now seen by its own proponents as almost completely unworkable for the kind of military operations that land forces will be undertaking in the years ahead. The oceans of information the systems would generate each day would clog the command circuits so that carrying out even the simplest operation would be a terrible slog.
\n\u00a0
\nAnd the U.S. Air Force, beyond its well-known devotion to massive bombing, remains in love with extremely advanced and extremely expensive fighter aircraft — despite losing only one fighter plane to an enemy fighter in nearly 40 years. Although the hugely costly F-22 turned out to function poorly and is being canceled after enormous investment in its production, the Air Force has by no means given up. Instead, the more advanced F-35 will be produced, at a cost running in the hundreds of billions of dollars. All this in an era in which what the United States already has is far better than anything else in the world and will remain so for many decades.
\n\u00a0
\nThese developments suggest that the United States is spending huge amounts of money in ways that are actually making Americans less secure, not only against irregular insurgents, but also against smart countries building different sorts of militaries. And the problem goes well beyond weapons and other high-tech items. What’s missing most of all from the U.S. military’s arsenal is a deep understanding of networking, the loose but lively interconnection between people that creates and brings a new kind of collective intelligence, power, and purpose to bear — for good and ill…..”<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the rest here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

It was nice to see Arquilla give some props to VADM Art Cebrowski<\/a><\/strong>, who is underappreciated these days as a strategic thinker and is much critricized by people who seldom bothered to read anything he actually wrote. Or who like to pretend that he had said a highly networked\u00a0Naval task\u00a0force is a good way to tackle an insurgency in an arid, mostly landlocked, semi-urban, middle-eastern nation.<\/p>\n

It also occurs to me that one of the reasons that the USAF resisted drones tooth and nail is that robotics combined with swarming points to en end ( or serious diminishment) of piloted warplanes.\u00a0Eliminating the design requirements implicit in human pilots makes for a smaller, faster, more maneuverable, more lethal aircraft that will probably be infinitely cheaper to make,\u00a0more easily risked in combat\u00a0and usable for “swarming”. Ditto attack helicopters.<\/p>\n

Of course, nuclear bombers will probably stay in human hands. Probably.<\/p>\n

ADDENDUM:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Contentious Small Wars Council<\/strong> thread <\/a>on Arquilla begun by “student of war” and defense consultant Wilf Owen<\/strong>. I have weighed in as has Shlok Vaidya<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

John Arqilla, along with David Ronfeldt, was\u00a0the pioneering military and security theorist\u00a0who forseaw the rise of networked non-state adversaries, which they detailed in their now classic book,\u00a0Networks and Netwars. Below, in a Foreign Policy mag article,\u00a0Arquilla expounds on the failure of the Pentagon to adapt sufficiently to leverage the power of networks or counter those […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[360,310,262,461,216,527,556,205,361,350,420,518,327,346,307,304,87,37,425,490,78,199,336,438,39,340,270,374,376,517,14,372,380,170,268,13,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-21st-century","category-3-gen-gangs","category-4gw","category-461","category-academia","category-afghanistan","category-air-force","category-al-qaida","category-america","category-army","category-authors","category-cebrowski","category-complex-systems","category-connectivity","category-david-ronfeldt","category-defense","category-foreign-policy","category-futurism","category-government","category-hierarchy","category-ideas","category-insurgency","category-intellectuals","category-john-arquilla","category-military","category-military-reform","category-national-security","category-navy","category-network-theory","category-network-centric-warfare","category-networks","category-non-state-actors","category-organizations","category-robotics","category-social-networks","category-theory","category-war"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3348\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}