{"id":3355,"date":"2010-03-06T06:43:18","date_gmt":"2010-03-06T06:43:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3355"},"modified":"2010-03-06T06:47:50","modified_gmt":"2010-03-06T06:47:50","slug":"the-rule-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3355","title":{"rendered":"The Rule of Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>&#8220;Law stands mute in the midst of arms. &#8220;<\/em> &#8211; Marcus Tullius Cicero<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8220;Bad laws are the worst form of tyranny&#8221;<\/em> &#8211; Edmund Burke<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>&#8220;Make them bow their heads under the yoke of the law&#8221;<\/em> &#8211; Russian proverb<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Frequent commenter <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.schmedlap.com\/\">Schmedlap<\/a><\/strong>, who has a<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.schmedlap.com\/weblog\/Latest.aspx\"> fine blog <\/a>of his own, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.schmedlap.com\/weblog\/post.aspx?id=100302-1#Comments\">asked his readers a very important question<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Today a smart, well-traveled, experienced, knowledgeable guy was telling me that &#8220;rule of law&#8221; is a concept that we need to stop worrying about. Strongly disagreeing, I asked why. After he explained why, it became clear that he was working with a significantly different definition of &#8220;rule of law&#8221; than I knew of. It reminded me of recent discussions here and elsewhere over definitions of culture, torture, and terrorism. Given his definition of &#8220;rule of law&#8221; I agreed that it is not something that we need to worry about. If &#8220;rule of law&#8221; = his definition, then rule of law is not important. If &#8220;rule of law&#8221; = my definition, then rule of law is important.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Just curious, what is your understanding of what &#8220;rule of law&#8221; means?<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I attempted to leave a comment, using a Google Chrome browser, but it failed to &#8220;stick&#8221;, so I will pontificate in my usual, windy, fashion here instead.<\/p>\n<p>The Anglo-American tradition of &#8220;rule of law&#8221;\u00a0is distinct from that of continental Europe or Confucianist traditions in A<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" align=\"right\" width=\"220\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sirbacon.org\/graphics\/coke.gif\" height=\"295\" \/>sia, both of which are primarily concerned in different ways with the health of the state. Anglo-American &#8220;rule of law&#8221; has been an evolutionary &#8211; and sometimes revolutionary &#8211; march to constrain the exercise of arbitrary power and, eventually, assure an egalitarian access to justice. When Norman French-speaking\u00a0<strong>King John<\/strong> of England\u00a0bitterly complained at <strong>Runnymede<\/strong> that the English barons might as well demand his crown, he was right. <strong>The Magna Carta<\/strong> was intended to curb John&#8217;s capricious tyranny with formal\u00a0rules governing how and when\u00a0the King could exercise power against whom.<\/p>\n<p>As national monarchies coalesced out of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bastard_feudalism\"><strong>bastard feudalism&#8217;s<\/strong> <\/a>kingdoms and medieval\u00a0principalities in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, the Kings propagated a theory of<strong> <\/strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Divine_Right_of_Kings\"><strong>divine right absolutism<\/strong><\/a>, which to our ears seems despotic, but to a sophisticated and wealthy, emerging, European\u00a0bourgeoisie at that time,\u00a0sounded like music. Better living under predictable, &#8220;national&#8221; laws and a King far away than a patchwork of greedy, grasping and unpredictable nobles who were ever\u00a0close at hand. That same, rational, middle-class political sentiment though, soon found fault with even<strong> <\/strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Enlightened_absolutism\"><strong>Enlightened absolutism<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Edward_Coke\">Lord Chief Justice Sir Edward Coke<\/a><\/strong>, a great man to whom much is owed, but who\u00a0today is largely forgotten, was the great theorist and defender\u00a0of judicial independence and common law from the whims of a sovereign. Without judicial independence, the rule of law is hardly possible because it is\u00a0ultimately\u00a0inseparable from the executive power; Coke was instrumental in moving elite Englishmen&#8217;s minds from accepting<strong><em> &#8220;Rex lex&#8221;<\/em><\/strong> (&#8220;The King is Law&#8221;) to demanding <strong><em>&#8220;Lex rex&#8221;<\/em><\/strong> (&#8220;The Law is king&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>The matter was not formally settled with the <strong>English Civil War<\/strong>, which came not long after Coke&#8217;s death, or even the <strong>Glorious Revolution of 1688;<\/strong> nor the <strong>American Revolution of 1776<\/strong> or even at <strong>Appomattox Courthouse<\/strong>.\u00a0 &#8220;The rule of law&#8221; is an ongoing struggle that must be constantly renewed by an active and vigilant citizenry if it is to be sustained.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Law stands mute in the midst of arms. &#8220; &#8211; Marcus Tullius Cicero &#8220;Bad laws are the worst form of tyranny&#8221; &#8211; Edmund Burke &#8220;Make them bow their heads under the yoke of the law&#8221; &#8211; Russian proverb Frequent commenter Schmedlap, who has a fine blog of his own, asked his readers a very important [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[602,361,48,54,53,117,334,524,260,425,51,78,278,465,545,418,187,603,179,180,381,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-16th-century","category-america","category-anglo-saxons","category-anglosphere","category-britain","category-egalitarianism","category-europe","category-evolution","category-freedom","category-government","category-history","category-ideas","category-legal","category-legitimacy","category-liberty","category-logic","category-politics","category-republic","category-revolution","category-rule-sets","category-society","category-theory"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3355\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}