{"id":3794,"date":"2011-03-02T23:23:15","date_gmt":"2011-03-02T23:23:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3794"},"modified":"2011-03-02T23:24:26","modified_gmt":"2011-03-02T23:24:26","slug":"elementary-my-dear-watson-for-humans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=3794","title":{"rendered":"Elementary, my dear Watson &#8212; for humans"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[ by <strong>Charles Cameron<\/strong> ]<\/p>\n<p>On the face of it, the two events described here \u2013 the super-match in which IBM&#8217;s <strong>Watson<\/strong> computer beat two human <em><strong>Jeopardy<\/strong> <\/em>champs, and the crowd-sourced protein-folding experiment in which nearly 60,000 <strong>gamers <\/strong>fared better than a <strong>supercomputer <\/strong>&#8212; would seem to say, respectively, that computers can defeat humans, and that humans can beat computers.  So what&#8217;s to believe?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/quoexperiments.gif\" title=\"quoexperiments.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/quoexperiments.gif\" alt=\"quoexperiments.gif\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think the opposition holds up on closer inspection, however.<\/p>\n<p>Watson may have beaten the human contestants in <em>Jeopardy<\/em>, but as the paragraph I quoted shows, it was nonetheless a human that &#8220;had the last word&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ben Zimmer<\/strong> in <em>The Atlantic<\/em> goes on to describe just how clever that &#8220;last word&#8221; actually was:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If you are a fan of <em>The Simpsons<\/em>, you&#8217;ll be able to identify it as a riff on a line from the 1994 episode, &#8220;Deep Space Homer,&#8221; wherein clueless news anchor Kent Brockman is briefly under the mistaken impression that a &#8220;master race of giant space ants&#8221; is about to take over Earth. &#8220;I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords,&#8221; Brockman says, sucking up to the new bosses. &#8220;I&#8217;d like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.&#8221;<br \/>\n.<br \/>\nEven if you&#8217;re not intimately familiar with that episode (and you really should be), you might have come across the &#8220;Overlord Meme,&#8221; which uses Brockman&#8217;s line as a template to make a sarcastic statement of submission: &#8220;I, for one, welcome our (new) ___ overlord(s).&#8221; Over on Language Log, where I&#8217;m a contributor, we&#8217;d call this kind of phrasal template a &#8220;snowclone,&#8221; and that one&#8217;s been on our radar since 2004. So it&#8217;s a repurposed pop-culture reference wrapped in several layers of irony.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Frankly, Watson isn&#8217;t up to that level of clever \u2013 it would take a <strong>Sherlock <\/strong>or a <strong>Mycroft <\/strong>to pull that off\u2026<br \/>\n.<br \/>\nSo in that first instance, the computer apparently beats the humans, but the humans come across as brighter than the computer all the same.<br \/>\n.<br \/>\nMore or less the opposite happens with my second example.  Here we have tens of thousands of humans pitted against a single computer, and the humans appear to have the edge \u2013 but do they?<br \/>\n.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s not the individual human brain that wins here, but what you might term &#8220;massively parallel human processing&#8221; \u2013 which isn&#8217;t nearly as impressive.<br \/>\n.<br \/>\nSo there are in fact three kinds of ingenuity on display here: the original <strong>small-group human ingenuity<\/strong> that constructed the machine, the machine&#8217;s own <strong>mechanical ingenuity<\/strong>, and the <strong>combined ingenuity<\/strong> of sixty thousand humans in <strong>distributed collaboration<\/strong>\u2026<\/p>\n<p>*<\/p>\n<p><strong>Look, here&#8217;s my challenge<\/strong>.  The folks at IBM need to read Hermann Hesse&#8217;s <em>Magister Ludi<\/em>, and figure out how to create the sort of computer that could best <strong>Joseph Knecht<\/strong> at his own game<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s make that a little easier.  they need to be able to recognize rich analogies across wide disciplinary distances &#8212; well enough to come up with a relationship comparable in its impact on two previously unrelated fields of knowledge to, say, the <strong>Taniyama-Shimura<\/strong> conjecture<em> <\/em>linking <strong>elliptic curves<\/strong> and <strong>modular forms<\/strong><em>\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Simpler still: they need to be able to play one of my <strong>HipBone Games<\/strong> \u2013 see <strong>Derek Robinson<\/strong>&#8216;s description of the games in <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/47035699\/Hipbone-Games-AI-and-the-rest-Derek-Robinson\">The HipBone Games, AI and the rest<\/a><\/strong> &#8212; well enough to pass a Turing test<em>. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>*<\/p>\n<p>Elementary, my dear Watson&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ by Charles Cameron ] On the face of it, the two events described here \u2013 the super-match in which IBM&#8217;s Watson computer beat two human Jeopardy champs, and the crowd-sourced protein-folding experiment in which nearly 60,000 gamers fared better than a supercomputer &#8212; would seem to say, respectively, that computers can defeat humans, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,46,526,134,346,33,21,471,444,529,388,23,47,462,32,599,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analogy","category-analytic","category-charles-cameron","category-computers","category-connectivity","category-consilience","category-creativity","category-cultural-intelligence","category-fiction","category-games","category-innovation","category-insight","category-intelligence","category-metacognition","category-science","category-science-fiction","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3794\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}