{"id":4167,"date":"2011-07-18T05:18:12","date_gmt":"2011-07-18T05:18:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=4167"},"modified":"2011-07-18T05:32:25","modified_gmt":"2011-07-18T05:32:25","slug":"outrage-over-news-corp-tale-of-two-standards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=4167","title":{"rendered":"Outrage Over News Corp: A Tale of Two Standards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As a rule, I eschew political news here but I think this one merits an exception.<\/p>\n<p>The big story of the moment for political junkies is the<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/News_of_the_World_phone_hacking_scandal\"> illegal hacking of cell phones allegedly\u00a0carried out by employees of one of <strong>Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s<\/strong> British tabloid\u00a0newspapers<\/a>. Not just any phones either, the\u00a0cell phones of British\u00a0VIPs, political bigwigs, celebrities and perhaps, some 9\/11 victims. All of the details have not been revealed, but there are police investigations, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052702304567604576451732627388162.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories\">one of News Corp&#8217;s top employees has been arrested<\/a>, parliamentary inquiries and demands by Murdochs political enemies there\u00a0to have the British government &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/politics\/2011\/jul\/16\/rupert-murdoch-ed-miliband-phone-hacking\">dismantle his empire<\/a>&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p>Rupert Murdoch is not, it must be said, a cuddly public figure. He is a press baron throwback to the era of <strong>Joseph Pulitizer<\/strong> and <strong>William Randolph Hearst<\/strong> and has a reputation for ruthlessness in business and overweening ambition in politics to gain personal influence for <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" align=\"right\" width=\"257\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nndb.com\/people\/420\/000023351\/murdoch-Img211954581.jpg\" height=\"300\" \/>promoting\u00a0his conservative views. He is a hate figure to Democratic and liberal partisans of the intolerant\u00a0kind who see political disagreement as evidence of evil and would like <strong>FOXnews<\/strong>, one of Murdoch&#8217;s most influential and profitable\u00a0properties,<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/blog\/200911200035\"> to<\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=b3GxaT0j43s&amp;feature=player_embedded#at=42\">be suppressed by the<strong> FCC<\/strong><\/a> (though Murdoch&#8217;s right-wing views did not preclude him from<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/business\/murdochs-china-dream-shattered-20080125-1o77.html\"> trying to cozy up to China&#8217;s communist\u00a0leadership<\/a>). These folks\u00a0are naturally celebrating Murdoch&#8217;s dilemma and hoping for a collapse &#8211; and Murdoch and his son James are in genuine jeopardy, possibly legal, certainly political and commercial.<\/p>\n<p>Much indignant outrage is being heaped on Murdoch&#8217;s head now by the enlightened; I have no love for phone hacking and I definitely agree that and\u00a0violating people&#8217;s privacy is a crime that ought to be punished by sending those responsible to prison. I am curious though, how this position\u00a0is squared morally with the fact that the two liberal\u00a0news outlets most triumphant about the News Corp scandal, <strong>The New York Times<\/strong> and <strong>The Guardian<\/strong>,\u00a0themselves recently were knowing accessories to the much more serious crime of <strong>espionage<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Actually calling these papers criminal accessories is not a full picture of their behavior during the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Wikileaks\"><strong>Wikileaks<\/strong> <\/a>document dump; it is more accurate to say that they reaped corporate financial benefit from facilitating espionage, <strong>grand theft<\/strong> and <strong>treason<\/strong>, for which their editors have not faced any legal consequences.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Yes, treason. Look up the\u00a0definition.<\/p>\n<p>Much unlike the nobody Army private and patsy, <strong>Bradley Manning<\/strong>, who is likely to face a sentence of life in prison. Good thing for \u00a0Manning that he only outed a vast array of\u00a0US intelligence and diplomatic secrets and exposed ordinary, unimportant, unprotected\u00a0<strong>Afghans<\/strong> and <strong>Iraqis<\/strong> to murderous retribution by Islamist degenerates. If\u00a0Manning had phonehacked a <strong>Labor MP<\/strong>\u00a0or a wealthy,\u00a0airhead celebrity &#8211; you know, really important and beautiful\u00a0people &#8211;\u00a0the NYT and the Guardian would be calling for a death sentence. It is a most\u00a0curious scale of values.<\/p>\n<p>Go back and look at which\u00a0partisan blowhards with columns and bylines and talking head\u00a0opinion shapers\u00a0thought Wikileaks was just great and defended <strong>Julian Assange<\/strong> and what their opinion is on phonehacking today\u00a0and see if any &#8211; any at all &#8211; evidence some consistency. Or awareness of the relative magnitude of each crime &#8211; and crime is the right word, neither of these scandals\u00a0are mere pranks, but one is important to national security\u00a0and the other, so far, is only\u00a0interesting.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s something amiss here in the way that partisan politics and a seamy, not too subtle,\u00a0undercurrent of class entitlement have warped the perspective and sense of proportion\u00a0of some people who are smart enough to know better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a rule, I eschew political news here but I think this one merits an exception. The big story of the moment for political junkies is the illegal hacking of cell phones allegedly\u00a0carried out by employees of one of Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s British tabloid\u00a0newspapers. Not just any phones either, the\u00a0cell phones of British\u00a0VIPs, political bigwigs, celebrities [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,53,277,309,425,163,139,270,96,588,562,400,187],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4167","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analytic","category-britain","category-corporations","category-criminals","category-government","category-guardian","category-media","category-national-security","category-new-york-times","category-oligarchy","category-perception","category-periodicals","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4167"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4167\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}