{"id":44456,"date":"2015-04-15T03:29:32","date_gmt":"2015-04-15T03:29:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=44456"},"modified":"2015-04-15T03:29:32","modified_gmt":"2015-04-15T03:29:32","slug":"recommended-reading-134","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=44456","title":{"rendered":"Recommended Reading"},"content":{"rendered":"

[by Mark Safranski<\/strong>, a.k.a. “zen<\/strong>“]<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Have not done this in a while as real life has eaten most of my blogging time, but here goes with a focus on Friends of Zenpundit!<\/em><\/p>\n

Adam Elkus<\/strong><\/a>, is writing on tech and society for\u00a0<\/a>Slate<\/a><\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n

….Tesla\u2019s Elon Musk and the famous astrophysicist Stephen Hawking have become standard-bearers for the growing fear over artificial intelligence\u2014but perhaps the most fascinating element here is that their warnings focus on hypothetical malicious automatons while ignoring real ones. Musk, in a recent interview, mused about<\/a>whether we would be lucky if future robots enslaved us as pets. Yet today humankind is imperiled by a different type of bot onslaught from which there is no escaping, and Musk has not sounded the alarm. Perhaps that is due to the fact that the artificial menace behind this rise of the machines is not really anything we would consider to be \u201cartificial intelligence.\u201d Instead, to survey the bot armies marching across the Internet is to marvel at the power of artificial stupidity. Despite bots\u2019 crudely coded, insectoid simplicity, they have managed to make a lot of people\u2019s lives miserable.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Charles<\/strong> already noted Cheryl Rofer, <\/strong>also a long time friend, has\u00a0<\/strong>assessments of the Iranian nuclear deal at Nuclear Diner <\/strong><\/a>and at Mother Jones<\/strong><\/em><\/a>:<\/p>\n

….The extent of Iran’s past activity on nuclear weapons was relegated to the IAEA by the P5+1 throughout the negotiations, and is a lesser provision in the fact sheet. Do we have to know all Iran’s dirty secrets to police a future agreement? Probably not.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Leader issued a tweet stream<\/a> that seems to give his blessing for a deal to go forward, but his words were unclear enough that domestic hardliners could seize on them in an attempt to scuttle the deal. Iran’s President Rouhani has voiced his support. In Israel, even the general who bombed the Osirak reactor<\/a> thinks it’s a good deal.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Thomas P.M. Barnett<\/strong><\/a> is blogging a little again after a very long hiatus where he was helping get Wikistrat<\/strong> up, running and growing. After connecting through the good offices of Critt Jarvis<\/strong><\/a>, Tom Barnett had a very significant influence in the evolution of zenpundit, particularly in inspiring my research interests to move from straight diplomatic history and foreign policy to a deep dive into strategy and grand strategy. On that note, I recommend you check out\u00a0How to Become a Grand Strategist\u00a0(unpublished)<\/a>:<\/p>\n

There are four fundamental reasons why American grand strategy matters more right now than any other nation\u2019s grand strategy.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The first is that the American example is provided the source code for this era\u2019s version of globalization, which superseded the colonial model of world integration previously pursued by the Eurasian imperial powers.\u00a0 These United States represent the oldest and most successful multinational economic, political and security union on the planet, a collection of states whose integration has been so successful and so deep that we forget the fantastic journey that brought us to this present state of being.\u00a0 We should not, because it is our essential gift to world history, currently finding its replication\u2014finally\u2014in the European context from which we sprang.\u00a0 The success of that model, the European Union, has made it the second great source code for the future of globalization.\u00a0 By both improving on and falling short of the original, it provides the world a much-needed contrast (i.e., \u201cgo slow\u201d globalization compared to our \u201cgo fast\u201d model) in these tumultuous economic times.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The second reason is that America currently serves as the sole historical bridge between settled Europe\u2019s post-military, post-nationalistic achievement of stable identity and rising Asia\u2019s pre-military, pre-nationalistic pursuit of the same.\u00a0 In other words, while Europe has evolved past the great sources of 20th<\/sup> century conflict (militarism, nationalism, ideologies in general), Asia\u2019s emerging powers\u2014save for Japan\u2014are rapidly approaching these historical phases, largely clinging to the hope that comprehensive marketization of their economies alone will so integrate their societies with the larger world as to render these traps obsolete.\u00a0 The trade-off, however, is substantial for the planet as a whole, because in so rapidly integrating with the global economy, Asian nations have turbo-charged globalization\u2019s dynamics to the point of resurrecting fears of zero-sum competitions among great powers for resources, markets and military allies in the decades ahead.\u00a0 They\u2019ve resurrected the specter of empires.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Dave Schuler<\/strong> at The Glittering Eye<\/strong> has a very appropriate post, given what haunts us on Wednesday\u00a0Our Lousy Tax System<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

….Since the ratification of the 16th Amendment in 1913 when Congress was granted the power to levy a tax based on income, something previously denied it, we\u2019ve done a major overhaul of our tax system roughly every 20 years. Our last overhaul was thirty years ago or, in other words, we\u2019re overdue. Our income tax system is like a ship. Just as a ship accumulates barnacles over time and must be hauled into drydock to be cleaned, our tax system accumulates breaks, loopholes, and so on. That\u2019s no accident. It\u2019s called \u201cconstituent service\u201d. It\u2019s built into our system of government.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Put me down in the \u201ccomplete change\u201d column. I honestly don\u2019t see how any progressive worthy of the name could defend our present tax system or any conservative worthy of the name would want to keep it. However, I would also put FICA, i.e. the \u201cpayroll tax\u201d, and the corporate income tax under the ax<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Congratulations to BJ Armstrong<\/strong><\/a>, Editor of 21st Century Mahan<\/strong><\/a>, for receiving\u00a0the General Roy S. Geiger Award<\/strong> by the Marine Corps Heritage Foundation<\/strong> <\/a>for his WOTR article,\u201cThe Answer to the Amphibious Prayer: Helicopters, the Marine Corps, and Defense Innovation.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Congratulations to Jonathan Jeckell<\/strong><\/a> who received a DoD<\/strong> award while seconded to The State Department<\/strong><\/a>, presented by another Friend of ZP, Dr.\u00a0Francis Park<\/strong>!<\/p>\n

In other news….<\/p>\n

Martin van Creveld<\/strong> is blogging<\/a> and has a new book out, Equality: The Impossible Quest<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

That’s it!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[by Mark Safranski, a.k.a. “zen“] Have not done this in a while as real life has eaten most of my blogging time, but here goes with a focus on Friends of Zenpundit! Adam Elkus, is writing on tech and society for\u00a0Slate: ….Tesla\u2019s Elon Musk and the famous astrophysicist Stephen Hawking have become standard-bearers for the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-recommended-reading"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=44456"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44456\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44495,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44456\/revisions\/44495"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=44456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=44456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=44456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}