{"id":44907,"date":"2015-05-31T22:30:37","date_gmt":"2015-05-31T22:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=44907"},"modified":"2015-05-31T22:30:37","modified_gmt":"2015-05-31T22:30:37","slug":"considering-various-of-the-universes-within-this-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=44907","title":{"rendered":"Considering various of the universes within this one"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ by Charles Cameron<\/strong> — 4th & last in a bizarre series [1<\/a>, 2<\/a>, 3<\/a>] — I must confess I prefer the NASA stars to the game world, but Wm. Blake’s world to all the rest ]
\n.<\/p>\n

My curiosity today leads me to compare two “represented” universes, each of them pretty much guaranteed — not that I place great credence in guarantees these days — to blow my mind or at least my socks off, and \/ or to quake my universe!<\/p>\n

\"SPEC<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here, to assist you in making your own comparison, are two text descriptions of the space photo (upper panel) and the game designs (lower):<\/p>\n

\"SPEC<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

My own feeling is that both are less awesome than their respective write-ups suggest: the NASA photo because it’s “awesomeness claim” is purely quantitative, whereas the universe is qualitative first and quantitative second; and the game images because they’re pale pastel imitations of our own world — fantastic<\/em>, yes, but far from imaginative<\/em>, to use the terminology Coleridge proposed. <\/p>\n

Sources:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
  • Joe Martino, NASA Has Released The Largest Picture Ever Taken. It Will Rock Your Universe<\/a>\n
  • Raffi Khatchadourian, World Without End: Creating a full-scale digital cosmos<\/a><\/li>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    **<\/p>\n

    To give us a sense of proportion — one that includes both qualitative and quantitative elements — here are some other images which, along with the ones from NASA and the game, give you a somewhat wider “range of universes” to consider — all of them in fact contained in the one we blog and read in:<\/p>\n

    \"SPEC<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    The first pair shows two humanly-generated images, one by the visionary artist and poet William Blake<\/strong>, the other by the documentary photographer Dorothea Lange<\/strong>. Realism, meet mythic imagination.<\/p>\n

    The second pair — aha!<\/em> — shows two desert sports: one almost archaic in its brutality, the other something akin to post-modern. In the upper panel we glimpse the Afghan national sport of Bukashi<\/strong>, in which the headless carcass of a goat is captured and carried to the goal by terrifying horsemen; in the lower, one of the robot jockeys who have replaced child-jockeys in the camel-racing<\/strong> of Dubai.<\/p>\n

    \"SPEC<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Sources:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • William Blake, Jacob’s Ladder<\/a>\n
  • Dorothea Lange, Migrant Mother<\/a>\n
  • L Lukasz, “BUZKASHI” in Mazar-e Sharif<\/a>\n
  • Avax News, Robots replace Child Jockeys<\/a><\/li>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    **<\/p>\n

    But let’s be fair to the two first screenshots at the top of the page. Here are the respective videos of the NASA Andromeda megapicture and the Hello Games’ No Man’s Sky<\/em> for you to consider on their merits —<\/p>\n