{"id":47254,"date":"2015-10-20T21:42:09","date_gmt":"2015-10-20T21:42:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=47254"},"modified":"2015-10-20T21:43:01","modified_gmt":"2015-10-20T21:43:01","slug":"on-the-felicities-of-graph-based-game-board-design-five","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=47254","title":{"rendered":"On the felicities of graph-based game-board design: five"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[ by <strong>Charles Cameron<\/strong> &#8212; Hofstadter Langdon Kim &#8212; for Gabi Nasemann, &#038; in recognition of G\u00f6del Escher Bach ]<br \/>\n.<\/p>\n<p>My friend the photographer <strong>Gabi Nasemann<\/strong> recently inquired whether I knew <strong>John Langdon<\/strong>&#8216;s book, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Wordplay-The-Philosophy-Science-Ambigrams\/dp\/0767920759\">Wordplay<\/a>, and I responded, <strong>DoubleQuote<\/strong>-style, with <strong>Scott Kim<\/strong>&#8216;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Inversions-Calligraphic-Cartwheels-Scott-Kim\/dp\/0070345465\">Inversions<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-kim-langdon.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-kim-langdon.png\" alt=\"SPEC kim langdon\" width=\"592\" height=\"621\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47255\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-kim-langdon.png 592w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-kim-langdon-286x300.png 286w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 592px) 100vw, 592px\" \/><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I had the pleasure of meeting Scott Kim lo these many years past at the <strong>Computer Game Developers Conference<\/strong>, and he was kind enough to say of my <strong>HipBone Games<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Your game does seem to really call to mind the Bead Game. Almost a divination system, much more metaphorical than most games.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>Scott Kim and his friend <strong>Doug Hofstadter<\/strong> both have a keen interest in <strong>Bach<\/strong>, so I thought it might be neat to see Scott&#8217;s treatment of the name &#8212; an <strong>ambigram<\/strong>, lower panel below &#8212; and how John Langdon might treat it &#8212; upper panel:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-bach.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-bach.png\" alt=\"SPEC bach\" width=\"592\" height=\"621\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47260\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-bach.png 592w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-bach-286x300.png 286w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 592px) 100vw, 592px\" \/><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Langdon&#8217;s Bach I assembled from his own typeface, <strong>Biform<\/strong>, which apparently seeped from his grasp into the wider world under the entirely irrelevant name <strong>Lampoon<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>Of all Langdon&#8217;s ambigrams, the one that&#8217;s no doubt best known &#8212; since <strong>Dan Brown<\/strong> used it in one of his execrable books &#8212; is his square of the four elements, upper panel, below:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-langdon-oronce.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-langdon-oronce.png\" alt=\"SPEC langdon oronce\" width=\"592\" height=\"621\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47256\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-langdon-oronce.png 592w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/SPEC-langdon-oronce-286x300.png 286w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 592px) 100vw, 592px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It was a nice touch, though, that Brown offered Langdon an <em>hommage <\/em>by naming his professor of symbiology after him. No doubt the fictional <strong>Robert Langdon<\/strong> would be familiar with the glorious diagram of the elements created by <strong>Oronce Fine<\/strong>, which he&#8217;d have run across in a 1549 Harvard Houghton Library volume, <a href=\"http:\/\/bibliodyssey.blogspot.com\/2010\/11\/celestial-mechanics.html\">Le Sphere du Monde<\/a>, and which I have elsewhere compared with Jewish and Christian diagrams:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/3-ancient-bds2.png\"> <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Sembl<\/strong> and <strong>HipBone <\/strong>gameboards are in the same genre.. being games of linkage that you play with your mind:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/games-you-play-in-your-mind.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/games-you-play-in-your-mind.png\" alt=\"games you play in your mind\" width=\"600\" height=\"605\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47267\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/games-you-play-in-your-mind.png 600w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/games-you-play-in-your-mind-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/games-you-play-in-your-mind-298x300.png 298w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sources and further readings:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<li><strong>John Langdon<\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnlangdon.net\/#ambigrams\">Ambigrams<\/a>\n<li><strong>Scott Kim<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?es_sm=122&#038;biw=1290&#038;bih=703&#038;tbm=isch&#038;sa=1&#038;q=scott+kim+ambigrams\">Ambigrams on Google Search<\/a>\n<li><strong>Scientific American<\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/podcast\/episode\/remembering-martin-gardner-with-dou-10-05-24\/\">Remembering Martin Gardner, with Douglas Hofstadter<\/a>\n<li><strong>Slate<\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/news_and_politics\/explainer\/2009\/09\/can_you_really_be_a_professor_of_symbology.html\">Can You Really Be a Professor of Symbology?<\/a>\n<li><strong>The New Yorker<\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/books\/page-turner\/harvard-no-symbology-here\">Harvard_ No Symbology Here<\/a>\n<li><strong>Wikipedia<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_Langdon\">Robert Langdon<\/a>\n<li><strong>Random House<\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.randomhouse.com\/doubleday\/davinci\/robertlangdon\/\">The Official Website of Harvard Symbologist Robert Langdon<\/a>\n<li><strong>John Langdon<\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnlangdon.net\/works\/langdon-biform\/\">Biform<\/a>\n<li><strong>John Langdon<\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/content.altfonts.com:88\/img\/L\/A\/Lampoon-RegularA.png\">Lampoon<\/a>\n<li><strong>Triple Canopy<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canopycanopycanopy.com\/contents\/this_is_your_brain_on_paper\">This is your brain on paper<\/li>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ by Charles Cameron &#8212; Hofstadter Langdon Kim &#8212; for Gabi Nasemann, &#038; in recognition of G\u00f6del Escher Bach ] . My friend the photographer Gabi Nasemann recently inquired whether I knew John Langdon&#8216;s book, Wordplay, and I responded, DoubleQuote-style, with Scott Kim&#8216;s Inversions: I had the pleasure of meeting Scott Kim lo these many [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[837,526,627,529,644,624,840,778,678,286,383,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bach","category-charles-cameron","category-doublequotes","category-games","category-graphical-thinking","category-hipbone-games","category-paradox","category-photography","category-sembl","category-series","category-symmetry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47254"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47280,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47254\/revisions\/47280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}