{"id":48393,"date":"2016-01-28T22:57:58","date_gmt":"2016-01-28T22:57:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=48393"},"modified":"2016-01-28T23:08:54","modified_gmt":"2016-01-28T23:08:54","slug":"trump-barthes-and-calvinball","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=48393","title":{"rendered":"Trump, Barthes and Calvinball"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ by Charles Cameron<\/strong> — not to mention Alasdair MacIntyre ]
\n.<\/p>\n

First, Calvinball<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

\"all_games_turn_into_calvinball<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

**<\/p>\n

If you’ve been following my stuff for a while, you’ll know I’m interested in situations where two teams or individuals are playing two different games. As the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre<\/strong> put it:<\/p>\n

Not one game is being played, but several, and, if the game metaphor may be stretched further, the problem about real life is that moving one\u2019s knight to QB3 may always be replied to by a lob over the net.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

**<\/p>\n

Roland Barthes<\/strong>, the French philosopher, made a related observation:<\/p>\n

This public knows very well the distinction between wrestling and boxing; it knows that boxing is a Jansenist sport, based on a demonstration of excellence. One can bet on the outcome of a boxing-match: with wrestling, it would make no sense. A boxing-match is a story which is constructed before the eyes of the spectator; in wrestling, on the contrary, it is each moment which is intelligible, not the passage of time\u2026 The logical conclusion of the contest does not interest the wrestling-fan, while on the contrary a boxing-match always implies a science of the future. In other words, wrestling is a sum of spectacles, of which no single one is a function: each moment imposes the total knowledge of a passion which rises erect and alone, without ever extending to the crowning moment of a result. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

**<\/p>\n

So what does this have to do with Donald Trump<\/strong>?<\/p>\n

Just that one of the more interesting things I’ve read about Trump’s campaign is Judd Legum<\/strong>‘s This French Philosopher Is The Only One Who Can Explain Why Trump Is Skipping The Republican Debate<\/em> — and his key graph essentially applies Barthes’ distinction to MacIntyre’s observation:<\/p>\n

In the current campaign, Trump is behaving like a professional wrestler while Trump\u2019s opponents are conducting the race like a boxing match. As the rest of the field measures up their next jab, Trump decks them over the head with a metal chair.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

If, like me, you find that idea illuminating, by all means read the whole thing<\/a>.<\/p>\n

**<\/p>\n

Bingo!<\/em><\/p>\n

**<\/p>\n

Ah, but..<\/p>\n