{"id":50334,"date":"2016-05-24T18:45:56","date_gmt":"2016-05-24T18:45:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=50334"},"modified":"2016-05-24T18:45:56","modified_gmt":"2016-05-24T18:45:56","slug":"a-rosary-of-glass-beads-for-emily-steiner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=50334","title":{"rendered":"A rosary of glass beads for Emily Steiner"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[ by <strong>Charles Cameron<\/strong> &#8212; semantic networks as game boards, old and new &#8212; see also the series presently linked at and ending with <a href=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=50254\">On the felicities of graph-based game-board design: six<\/a> ]<br \/>\n.<\/p>\n<p>Since I&#8217;m plaguing <strong>Emily Steiner<\/strong> with my thoughts on two of her recent tweets, I&#8217;d best explain first the reasons for my interest.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Game-boards-1-1.png\" alt=\"Game-boards-1\" width=\"600\" height=\"587\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-50349\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Game-boards-1-1.png 600w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Game-boards-1-1-300x294.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><br \/>\ntop left, a HipBione &#8220;WaterBird&#8221; board; right, <strong>Cath Styles<\/strong>&#8216; &#8220;Museum Game&#8221; board; lower left, an early HipBone &#8220;DoubleQuote&#8221; board; right, the &#8220;Said Symphony&#8221; board <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As long time readers here will already be aware, I&#8217;m involved in the design, development and play of a family of games based on <strong>Hermann Hesse<\/strong>&#8216;s conceptual <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Glass-Bead-Game-Magister-Ludi\/dp\/8087888383\">Glass Bead Game<\/a>, using boards that are what mathematicians would term <strong>graphs<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>Technically, our game boards in the course of play are what <strong>Margaret Masterman<\/strong> termed semantic networks &#8212; and Masterman herself cited one such network from an earlier century imaging the Trinity &#8212; here on the right panel &#8212; which I have reproduced  in the triptych below along with a diagram of the Kabbalah, left, and of <a href=\"http:\/\/iiif.lib.harvard.edu\/manifests\/view\/drs:18260773$23i\">the elements by <strong>Oronce Fine<\/strong><\/a>, center:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/3-ancient-bds2-1.png\" alt=\"3-ancient-bds2\" width=\"601\" height=\"265\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-50350\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/3-ancient-bds2-1.png 601w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/3-ancient-bds2-1-300x132.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 601px) 100vw, 601px\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>Which brings me to the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PiersatPenn\/status\/734741253397598208\">first of two tweets Prof. Steiner posted today<\/a> &#8212; the image of a head, with what is clearly a semantic network inside it &#8212; thoughts connecting with thoughts, or brain areas with brain areas, or perhaps both:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Akasha-games-in-the-mind-2.png\" alt=\"Akasha games in the mind\" width=\"600\" height=\"870\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-50352\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Akasha-games-in-the-mind-2.png 600w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Akasha-games-in-the-mind-2-207x300.png 207w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Viewed from the perspective of the HipBone Games, this semantic network within a brain (mind) is what the Buddha termed, somewhat reprovingly, a game played <strong>akasa<\/strong>, &#8220;by imagining a board in the air&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>But the Buddhist tradition wasn&#8217;t always as, what shall I say? &#8212; <strong>puritanical about games<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Tablet-DQ-Monastic-games-2.png\" alt=\"Tablet DQ Monastic games\" width=\"600\" height=\"870\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-50353\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Tablet-DQ-Monastic-games-2.png 600w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Tablet-DQ-Monastic-games-2-207x300.png 207w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As you&#8217;ll see, the upper panel here is a bit more relaxed on the subject of games in Buddhism &#8212; while the lower panel shows another game board, this one for a medieval Christian game on the Gospels, which Dr Steiner featured in <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/PiersatPenn\/status\/734510510121582593\">the other tweet of hers that caught my eye today<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>There are four canonical Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, but they&#8217;re actually asymmetrical, Matthew, Mark, and Luke sharing properties and chunks of text which have conferred on them the group title of the &#8220;synoptic gospels&#8221; &#8212; while John is more symbolic, deeper, indeed mystical, and stands alone.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a saying about them, <strong>Read, Mark, Learn, and Inwardly Digest<\/strong>. I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s intended to name the four pof them, but since Mark is second in order both in the saying and in the sequence of gospels found in the New Testament, I&#8217;m happy to consider John&#8217;s Gospel to be the equivalent of Inwardly Digest<\/p>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>But bringing the ancients into the modern day is a laudable activity, so I&#8217;ll close by taking that Gospel game board, as I like to think of it, and compariung it with one of the boards from the recent series of games in which AlphaGo &#8212; clearly a <strong>duende<\/strong> or <strong>djinn<\/strong> of some sort &#8212; beat out our best-living Go master in a series of 5 games:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Tablet-DQ-Go-and-Gospel-games-1.png\" alt=\"Tablet DQ Go and Gospel games\" width=\"600\" height=\"870\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-50344\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Tablet-DQ-Go-and-Gospel-games-1.png 600w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Tablet-DQ-Go-and-Gospel-games-1-207x300.png 207w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Again, <strong>symmetry and asymmetry<\/strong>. Is the symmetry of the Gospels game a symmetry of the Divine Mind? And is the asymmetry of the game of Go an asymmetry of the two minds in play &#8212; or simply of a game in which one player gets to make the first move?<\/p>\n<p>I look forward to learning from Dr Steiner how the Gospel game was played.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ by Charles Cameron &#8212; semantic networks as game boards, old and new &#8212; see also the series presently linked at and ending with On the felicities of graph-based game-board design: six ] . Since I&#8217;m plaguing Emily Steiner with my thoughts on two of her recent tweets, I&#8217;d best explain first the reasons for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1122,1355,701,649,526,134,627,529,912,624,1039,676,678,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ai","category-alphago","category-buddhism","category-buddhist","category-charles-cameron","category-computers","category-doublequotes","category-games","category-glass-bead-game-2","category-hipbone-games","category-medieval","category-scriptures","category-sembl","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=50334"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50334\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50379,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50334\/revisions\/50379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=50334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=50334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=50334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}