{"id":53818,"date":"2017-01-10T04:36:14","date_gmt":"2017-01-10T04:36:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=53818"},"modified":"2017-01-10T04:55:31","modified_gmt":"2017-01-10T04:55:31","slug":"u-s-strategy-board-an-idea-whose-time-has-come","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=53818","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Strategy Board – An Idea Whose Time Has Come?"},"content":{"rendered":"

[Mark Safranski<\/strong> \/ “zen<\/strong>“]<\/p>\n

\"Image<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dr. Frank Hoffman<\/strong> has a piece up in Eurasiareview.com<\/strong> assessing the merits of an idea that in my humble opinion has some utility not merely for the incoming Trump administration<\/strong> but the institutional national security bureaucracy – a Strategy Board.<\/p>\n

A Presidential Strategy Board: Enabling Strategic Competence \u2013 Analysis<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

The National Security Council (NSC) staff was once called the Keepers of the Keys<\/em>, managers of the coordinating process that is central to an administration\u2019s ability to plan and conduct a successful grand strategy.[1] The NSC has had an evolving role, as has its staff.[2] The NSC evolves to the strategic context that any administration faces, and it must also reflect the information processing and decision-making style of the president. The inbound Trump administration will soon face the challenge of integrating America\u2019s diplomatic, military, and economic tools and applying them globally and coherently.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Many have offered advice on how to properly focus NSC staff as well as the \u201cright size\u201d of the group.<\/em> NSC structures and processes are designed to fulfill the needs of the president and should support his policy and decision-making requirements. These may vary from president to president to fit information processing and decision-making styles as well as the character of an administration\u2019s foreign policy. Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, the president-elect\u2019s National Security Advisor, will manage the evolution of the NSC team to best support Mr. Trump and establish processes and coordinating mechanisms to tee up presidential decisions and implement the foreign policy initiatives of our 45th<\/sup> President.<\/strong><\/p>\n

[….]<\/strong><\/p>\n

More importantly, we have misdiagnosed and mislabeled the problem. The White House\u2019s real shortfall is strategy formulation, not planning. Strategy is not planning, but a good strategy enables proper planning.[20] Hence, I contend that the solution lies in creating a Strategy Board.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Deputy National Security Advisor\u2014President-elect Trump has tapped K.T. McFarland for the position\u2014would chair the Strategy Board, and the board would not duplicate the existing system of Deputy and Principal\u2019s committees. Its composition would include serving government officials below the existing committee structure from the Departments, NSC, and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) staff members as well as external members from outside government. Like Eisenhower\u2019s board, this group would be charged with anticipating problems, generating solutions independent of Departmental preferences\/inclinations, and proposing cost effective strategies. The planning details of approved strategic initiatives would be delegated to the respective Departments.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The board would conduct long-range strategic planning processes for presentation to the Deputy and Principal\u2019s Committees at regular periods, including presidential strategy directives assigning priorities and resource allocations that would shape or inform Departmental budgets.[21] OMB representation would improve the connection between policy and budgets, enhancing long-term implementation and strategic coherence.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the whole thing here<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n

This is a good idea as strategic excellence\u00a0has been a quality not greatly in evidence in American statecraft in the previous sixteen years and many have argued that we have been adrift since the end of the Cold War. The time horizons of\u00a0the NSC<\/strong> and the IC<\/strong> are chronically driven by a sense of urgency toward the short term, to “reporting” over “analysis”, to tactics and political\u00a0gestures over strategic perspectives – something a strategy board with some gravitas in its members would help counterbalance.<\/p>\n

I had a related proposal five or six years ago\u00a0that was more blue sky than Dr. Hoffman’s strategy board, focusing on the long to very long term American grand strategy:<\/p>\n

Time for a Grand Strategy Board?<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

….The President of the United States, of course has a number of bodies that could, should but do not always provide strategic advice. There\u2019s the Defense Policy Advisory Board<\/a>, an Intelligence Advisory Board<\/a>,\u00a0 the National Intelligence Council<\/a>, the State Department\u2019s Policy Planning Staff<\/a>, the Office of Net Assessment<\/a>\u00a0and not least, the NSC itself and the Joint Chiefs of Staff<\/a>, whose Chairman, by act of Congress, is the military advisor to the President and Secretary of Defense. While strategic thinking does percolate from these entities, many have very specific mandates\u00a0or, conversely, wide ranging briefs on matters other than strategy. Some operate many levels below the Oval Office,\u00a0are filled with superannuated politicians or have\u00a0personnel who, while intellectually brilliant, are excessively political and untrained in matters of strategy. The Joint Chiefs, the professionals of strategy,\u00a0are highly cognizant of the\u00a0Constitutional deference they are\u00a0required to give to\u00a0civilian officials and are very\u00a0leery of overstepping their bounds into the more political realms of policy and\u00a0grand strategy.<\/strong><\/p>\n

What\u00a0 the President could use is a high level group just focused on getting strategy right \u2013 or making sure we have one at all.<\/strong><\/p>\n

I\u2019m envisioning a relatively small group composed of a core of pure strategists leavened with the most strategically oriented of our elder statesmen, flag officers, spooks and thinkers from cognate fields. A grand strategy board would be most active at the start of an administration and help in the crafting of the national strategy documents and return periodically when requested to give advice. Like the Spartan Gerousia, most of the members ( but not all) would be older and freer of the restraint of institutional imperatives and career ambitions. Like the Anglo-American joint chiefs and international conferences of WWII and the immediate postwar era, they would keep their eye on the panoramic view.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the rest here<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n

We have seen in many administrations and not least in the last two, a tendency toward insularity and groupthink, to politicized intelligence, to cutting subject matter experts out of the policy loop to better put forward much cherished but stridently evidence-free ideas and a general approach that eschews basic strategic thinking in favor of grasping for momentary tactical advantages to please domestic political factions. This lack of overarching strategy to tie together the strands of policy so that our bureaucracies pull in the direction of reality is why we lose wars and repeatedly get diplomatically\u00a0outmaneuvered on the world stage by second and third rate powers.<\/p>\n

A strategy board would not be a silver bullet. It won’t cure White House micromanagement by itself or keep the NSC from going rogue or make Defense, CIA\u00a0or State produce workable options for the POTUS in a timely fashion. But\u00a0a strategy board could\u00a0well help clarify thinking at the inception and challenge the various players to pull together intellectually and operationally. It could makes things better.<\/p>\n

And at the rate America has been going lately, we could hardly do worse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[Mark Safranski \/ “zen“] Dr. Frank Hoffman has a piece up in Eurasiareview.com assessing the merits of an idea that in my humble opinion has some utility not merely for the incoming Trump administration but the institutional national security bureaucracy – a Strategy Board. A Presidential Strategy Board: Enabling Strategic Competence \u2013 Analysis The National […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[361,87,425,270,481,127,1370],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-america","category-foreign-policy","category-government","category-national-security","category-strategist","category-strategy","category-trump"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=53818"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53818\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53820,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53818\/revisions\/53820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=53818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=53818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=53818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}