{"id":53978,"date":"2017-02-08T04:01:15","date_gmt":"2017-02-08T04:01:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=53978"},"modified":"2017-02-08T04:09:39","modified_gmt":"2017-02-08T04:09:39","slug":"strategy-and-prometheus-unbound","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=53978","title":{"rendered":"Strategy and Prometheus Unbound"},"content":{"rendered":"

[Mark Safranski<\/strong> \/ “zen<\/strong>“]<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Senior Counselor to the President and Chief Strategist, Steve Bannon<\/strong><\/p>\n

Steve Bannon<\/strong><\/a> has been very much in the news lately, as one might expect of a former Breitbart<\/strong><\/a> editor turned closest adviser to the President of the United States. Much of this has been political fare by friends and foes (ok, mostly foes). We have read debates about his ideological worldview, the exact nature of Bannon’s (and Breitbart’s)\u00a0 ties to the sinister\u00a0Alt-Right<\/a><\/strong>, his rank in the White House pecking order<\/a>,\u00a0Bannon’s\u00a0vision of realignment of American politics<\/a>, populism, ethnonationalism, executive orders, the books he reads <\/a>and so on. Charles<\/strong> has already weighed in here <\/a>but I am not delving into these things\u00a0today.<\/p>\n

Less attention, though usually also accompanied by outrage<\/a>, have been stories on foreign policy and national security. Nevertheless, the media gave wide play to\u00a0Bannon’s comments about potential war with China<\/a>, possible civilizational partnership with Putin’s Russia <\/a>and most notably, Bannon being given a permanent\u00a0invitation to meetings of the Principal’s Committee of the National Security Council<\/strong><\/a>. Most Democrats and many national security professionals believed Bannon, as a political adviser,\u00a0 had no business being seated on the NSC by historical standards. While this is true, it is not a very credible argument in light of the previous administration’s decision to make a mere campaign speechwriter with no prior experience an unusually\u00a0powerful Deputy National Security Adviser.<\/p>\n

I think the criticisms based on customary protocol arguments\u00a0miss the mark by a country mile.<\/p>\n

We are all familiar with the ancient Greek myth of the Titan Prometheus<\/strong><\/a>. It was Prometheus, whose name meant “forethought”, who defied the gods to give Man the gift of fire – a gift that unleashed the immense\u00a0creative powers of mankind. For this affront to the gods’ authority, Prometheus was severely punished. Zeus<\/strong> binds Prometheus to Mount Caucasus where an eagle tears out his liver each day. A torment Prometheus endures for ages until the coming of Hercules.<\/p>\n

Strategy in American national security\u00a0is much like Prometheus. Potentially useful as a creative force, sometimes employed like the gift of fire as a useful tool in a small way, most often inert, bound immobile to the rock of policy as politics savagely\u00a0tears out the liver of anyone posing a strategy that might prevent a foreign policy crisis from becoming a debacle. The truth is that the gods, or in this case the established political class, much prefer a predictable and orderly debacle under their stewardship than a messy win for America with unpredictable second and third order effects.<\/p>\n

In fairness, most of the time, stability while accruing small losses is preferable for a global hegemonic power like the United States\u00a0to disruptively embarking upon large risks to its position in order to win small gains. So long as the international\u00a0system is strategically designed to\u00a0sustain hegemony, occasional losses can be a cost of doing business until the system or parts of it no longer appear to be working. Or until\u00a0political support wanes at home.<\/p>\n

The objection to Bannon (aside from his politics) is that a domestic political strategist should not be involved in the NSC. David Axelrod<\/strong> and Valerie Jarrett<\/strong> were not. Karl Rove<\/strong> wasn’t.\u00a0 James Carville<\/strong>, Lee Atwater<\/strong> and innumerable other key political White House staffers never sat on the NSC. However, I don’t think Steve Bannon was invited to attend NSC Principal Committee meetings in that role. Nor was he “replacing” the DNI<\/strong> or CIA<\/strong> Director or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff<\/strong>. They were not “replaced” but as customary bureaucratic constraints on policy formulation they were\u00a0intentionally removed<\/em>.<\/p>\n

I think Steve Bannon – whose prior professional efforts at a high level were all about creating and\u00a0articulating a vision –\u00a0is really the Trump administration’s grand<\/a>\u00a0strategist<\/a><\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

And he’s unbound.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[Mark Safranski \/ “zen“] Senior Counselor to the President and Chief Strategist, Steve Bannon Steve Bannon has been very much in the news lately, as one might expect of a former Breitbart editor turned closest adviser to the President of the United States. Much of this has been political fare by friends and foes (ok, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[360,361,1457,270,481,127],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-21st-century","category-america","category-bannon","category-national-security","category-strategist","category-strategy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=53978"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53982,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53978\/revisions\/53982"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=53978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=53978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=53978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}