{"id":54738,"date":"2017-04-16T16:48:14","date_gmt":"2017-04-16T16:48:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=54738"},"modified":"2017-04-16T17:32:55","modified_gmt":"2017-04-16T17:32:55","slug":"dank-ponds-and-high-places-in-the-garden-of-forking-paths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=54738","title":{"rendered":"Dank ponds and high places in the garden of forking paths"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ by Charles Cameron<\/strong> — Borges’ finest fiction, read with an eye to serpents within serpents ]
\n.<\/p>\n

The pre-conscious mind, it seems to me, runs innumerable options before providing a single, first conscious selection, an initial thought, which we can then ourselves choose or dismiss, swaying away from whatever tendency we might dislike in that first choice, with alternatives then provided until we settle on a thought we can live with — whether because it suits our lust, our liking, our laughter, our love, or — simplest — love itself. The whole enterprise resembles, literarily speaking, Jorge Luis Borges<\/strong>‘ Garden of Forking Paths<\/a> [link is to a deliciously annotated version, see more below].<\/p>\n

But here’s the thing: my mind, at least, offers me quite a mixed bag of lascivious, laughing, light-hearted and level-headed options, all unbidden, and while the courteous Chinese gentleman in Borges’ fine short story would surely only have a selection of insights suitable for the Yellow Empereor among the branchings of his garden’s paths, and his maze of thoughts itself sums up to a transcendant mind, on the wider, non-literary world stage and usual human level there are some pretty dank pools of stagnant ideation to be found, and some skulls among the living that choose to harbor and indeed nourish those pools, hoping their poisonous atmosphere may prove contagious.<\/p>\n

**<\/p>\n

I am driven to these thoughts by a report from yesterday’s Sydney Morning Herald<\/em>, Revealing the secrets of one of Australia\u2019s worst online trolls<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Ordinarily I might have scanned this account of an online neo-Nazi and moved on, but it contains a built-in ourboros or snake biting its own tail, when the former pulp magazine editor who lost his job after being persecuted for his affinity with Nazi dolls, and who lived alone in a rooming house, self-published a novel featuring, and I quote, “a former pulp magazine editor who lost his job after being persecuted for his affinity with Nazi dolls, and who lived alone in a rooming house..”<\/p>\n

Self-publishing is arguably a mildly neurotic ouroboric loop, but William Blake<\/strong> looped it, as did Martin Luther<\/strong>, Jane Austen<\/strong>, Emily Dickinson<\/strong>, Marcel Proust<\/strong>, and Edward Tufte<\/strong>, to name a few..<\/p>\n

Self-publishing an autobiographical fiction, however, is more deeply loopy — for the ugly details, see the SMH piece<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Gloriously, Borges reaches as high as the neo-Nazi stoops low: some hope remains for humanity.<\/p>\n

**<\/p>\n

Annotation “o” in the annotated version of The Garden of Forking Paths<\/a> mentioned above offers us a further — and specifically rhetorical — form of ouroboros to contemplate: <\/p>\n

Linguists might classify the phrase \u201clabyrinth of labyrinths<\/strong>\u201d as an example of the genitive of gradation<\/em>, as in the biblical \u201cKing of Kings,\u201d from Daniel <\/em>2:37 (originally in Hebrew, \u201cMelech ha-M\u2019lachim\u201d), I Timothy<\/em> 4:14, and Revelations<\/em> 17:14 and 19:16 (Curme, [6, p. 88]). Here the repetition of words conveys a sense of preeminence or superiority. A similar rhetorical device occurs earlier in line 30. But \u201ccenturies of centuries\u201d might be more readily interpreted as a time span of hundreds of hundreds of years, constituting what is known as the partitive genitive<\/em>, as in the \u201cland of milk and honey.\u201d Both usages are marvelously recursive, like \u201cwheels within wheels,\u201d and like the Thousand of One Nights<\/em>, alluded to on line 230, which is a tale of a tale of a tale..<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Wheels within wheels — indeed, tiny wheels in a footnote to a larger one — at which point we are back at Ezekiel <\/strong>and his vision<\/a> of the dry bones<\/a>, from which I derive my own username, hipbone<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

**<\/p>\n

Fscinatingly, certain equivalent pieces on opposing sides of xiangqi<\/em>, the Chinese chess game of the sort Borges’ Ts\u2019ui P\u00ean<\/strong> would have played, have different names, though “pieces on the same row in the table below share the same move and ability”:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Their order of battle at the commencement of the game are as follows:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

I’m grateful to Robert R. Snapp<\/a>, Associate Professor of Computer Science at the University of Vermont, for his outstanding contribution to this (mostly) delightful romp through the forking gardens of ideas..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[ by Charles Cameron — Borges’ finest fiction, read with an eye to serpents within serpents ] . The pre-conscious mind, it seems to me, runs innumerable options before providing a single, first conscious selection, an initial thought, which we can then ourselves choose or dismiss, swaying away from whatever tendency we might dislike in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[677,1212,1477,526,144,859,529,624,652,295,1479,1478,1177,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-australia","category-blake","category-borges","category-charles-cameron","category-china","category-form","category-games","category-hipbone-games","category-literature","category-nazis","category-ouroboros","category-self-reference","category-troll","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54738"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54738\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54757,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54738\/revisions\/54757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}