{"id":54914,"date":"2017-05-21T23:45:11","date_gmt":"2017-05-21T23:45:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=54914"},"modified":"2017-05-22T00:10:00","modified_gmt":"2017-05-22T00:10:00","slug":"review-why-socrates-died-by-waterfield","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=54914","title":{"rendered":"REVIEW: Why Socrates Died by Waterfield"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ Mark Safranski<\/strong> \/ “zen<\/strong>“]<\/p>\n

\"Image<\/p>\n

Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths<\/strong><\/a> by Robin Waterfield<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

2400 years after his trial and execution at the hands of the restored Democracy, Socrates<\/strong><\/a> continues to exert a fascination over the Western mind. He is a seminal figure in the development of philosophy and was part of the cognitive revolution in classical Greece that saw a shift from archaic Homeric\u00a0values\u00a0<\/a>to humanistic, rational\u00a0and proto-scientific values. The death of Socrates, condemned for thought crimes, was\u00a0the great\u00a0contradiction of Athenian self-conception of Athens as\u00a0 “the school of Hellas<\/a>” and his execution\u00a0remained an indictment\u00a0leveled\u00a0by the enemies of\u00a0democracy ever since. While the importance of Socrates is\u00a0universally\u00a0acknowledged, the exact\u00a0circumstances and motives for his death remain obscure; ironically, a philosopher who so deeply valued “truth” had prosecutors and apologists equally determined to conceal or distort it.<\/p>\n

British scholar and translator Robin Waterfield<\/strong> has attempted, as did radical journalist I.F. Stone<\/strong> <\/a>a generation earlier, to unearth the truth behind the myths about Socrates. Unlike Stone, Waterfield’s\u00a0investigation,\u00a0Why Socrates Died<\/strong><\/em><\/a> , rests on an extensive<\/a>\u00a0career<\/a> translating<\/a> and writing about the classics, including the major primary and secondary sources used for\u00a0his book. This provides a firmer base for the inevitable speculation from limited evidence that is frequently required in historical reasoning about antiquity. Waterfield is also far less influenced by contemporary political and cultural conflicts than was Stone, whose turbulent career <\/a>as an investigative journalist was intertwined with Cold War<\/strong> controversies and his\u00a0activities on behalf of the\u00a0intelligence services of the Soviet Union<\/strong><\/a>. Waterfield also understands far better the machinery of the Athenian state and the nature of Greek polytheistic religious life, which Stone erroneously believed had become thoroughly secularized by the time of the trial of Socrates.<\/p>\n

Waterfield notes that while it is normal that most of the records of historical events during\u00a0antiquity are fragmentary or have vanished, we two purported records for\u00a0Socrates’ defense speech at his trial, one of the prosecution and numerous apologia. Socrates trial was obviously no ordinary law case for impiety, being still recalled by Athenians a half-century later. Nor did the disciples of Socrates who most ardently took up his cause, Plato<\/strong><\/a> and Xenophon<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0wish the case to be forgotten but rather endeavored to protect their master’s reputation for all posterity. Waterfield writes:<\/p>\n

….Both Plato and Xenophon wanted to give their readers the impression that a high-minded philosopher was convicted by the stupidity of the mob, but this was an attempt to distract attention from the real reasons Socrates was killed.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The real reason posited by Waterfield was that\u00a0Socrates\u00a0 was the teacher of Alcibiades<\/strong> and Critias<\/strong> <\/a>and thus bore some responsibility for the grave misfortunes\u00a0suffered by\u00a0Athens during the war and the crimes of the Thirty Tyrants<\/strong> <\/a>afterwards. Moreover, as Waterfield argues, Socrates was not so much the victim of a political show trial in which Socrates deliberately provoked the democratic faction to kill him, as I.F. Stone argued but was a religious sacrifice or scapegoat for the transgressions of his students against democracy so that a fragile Athenian society could heal its wounds.<\/p>\n

Much of the book is devoted to the career\u00a0of the mercurial and highly charismatic\u00a0Alcibiades, who entered politics young and as a disciple of Socrates. According to Wakefield,\u00a0A scion of\u00a0the greatest of Athenian houses, Alcibiades in his person\u00a0was emblematic of all of the virtues and vices of the old Athenian aristocracy that had once ruled Athens from the grand council of the Aeropagus. Of the rising generation of young and clever men of good breeding who aimed to play a role in the politics of the\u00a0radical democracy, Alcibiades had the greatest promise. Highly intelligent, wealthy, handsome and with a magnetic charm,\u00a0Alcibiades had the natural\u00a0ar\u00eate<\/a> and metis<\/a> to romance the mob and bend it to his will. It was this that Waterfield argues attracted the attention of Socrates, who saw in Alcibiades and other young men of promising talent he took on as students\u00a0the future of Athens.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, with Alcibiades, his\u00a0numerous gifts could never be separated from his equally stupendous flaws – sexual libertinism, flamboyant profligacy, megalomaniacal ambition and reckless\u00a0hubris – that were frequently his undoing. A psychological chameleon and demagogue, Waterfield argues that the Athenians, as much as they repeatedly forgave and embraced Alcibiades and his schemes, ultimately feared him as an aspiring tyrant. This feeling crystallized into blame for Socrates in the public mind\u00a0when other students of his who lacked the charms of Alcibiades, notably Critias, sought revolution and oligarchy. Critias’ bloodthirsty pro-Spartan regime as well as the elite’s\u00a0prior attempt at oligarchy are explained but not with the same space and attention to detail devoted to Alcibiades. One point that Waterfield takes further than most is arguing that Critias aspirations for a morally reformed and less populated Athens are very much in line with the teachings of Socrates. That far from an aberration for whom Socrates bears little responsibility, Critias represented the philosopher’s hopes for Athens and the Athenian democrats who had suffered at the hands of the Thirty Tyrants wanted someone held accountable. That someone was Socrates, whose teachings as it were, would imperil democracy again were he left at liberty.<\/p>\n

Waterfield’s handling of the trial itself is less satisfying and includes a lengthy foray into fictive speculation of material prejudicial to Socrates that his notable apologists, Plato and Xenophon, have carefully omitted from their elegies to their beloved master and his trial. The parallels between Athenian religious ceremony and the results of Socrates trial – a trial for impiety\u00a0held in defiance of the general amnesty that had been decreed for actions under previous regimes – are present. The Greeks did not as a rule go in for human sacrifices in the classical era (though it wasn’t quite as unknown as is commonly believed) but the symmetry is present if more metaphorical than perhaps explicitly religious. It is difficult as a modern to game out exactly where matters of state end and religion begin when the religion is pagan and intertwined in the mind of Athenians with the fate of the state. A debate more for classical scholars than the average layman.<\/p>\n

What is difficult to dispute is the centrality of Socrates life in the evolution of Western philosophy and the contradiction he presents for admirers of self-government and free speech and thought as the core of a liberal society. Socrates elenchus is radically subversive; his Homeric tenets on rulership were arch-reactionary even by the standards of his day\u00a0and\u00a0Socrates devotion to his beliefs could not be dented even when they required the supreme sacrifice.<\/p>\n

What would an American Socrates look and sound like today? How would “the herd” react to his immovable defiance of popular ideologies? Judging by the barometer of social media and the lynch mob mentalities and angry censoriousness that prevail in elite\u00a0quarters of American life, I’d have to say: poorly. I see\u00a0no evidence that Americans living in the bastion of civil liberty would prove more tolerant of dissent\u00a0than did the Athenian democrats who put Socrates to death.<\/p>\n

Waterfield has written a lively and informative explanation of a philosopher whose execution casts a long shadow even after\u00a0two thousand\u00a0years.\u00a0 Recommended.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[ Mark Safranski \/ “zen“] Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths by Robin Waterfield 2400 years after his trial and execution at the hands of the restored Democracy, Socrates continues to exert a fascination over the Western mind. He is a seminal figure in the development of philosophy and was part of the cognitive revolution […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[360,216,414,420,133,218,1052,445,1010,833,381,795],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-21st-century","category-academia","category-ancient-history","category-authors","category-book","category-philosophy","category-punishment","category-reading","category-review","category-sacrifice","category-society","category-story"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54914"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54914\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55243,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54914\/revisions\/55243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}