{"id":65454,"date":"2019-06-30T21:19:55","date_gmt":"2019-06-30T21:19:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=65454"},"modified":"2019-07-01T00:15:34","modified_gmt":"2019-07-01T00:15:34","slug":"__trashed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=65454","title":{"rendered":"Whoa boy, Roy Lichtenstein"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[ by <strong>Charles Cameron<\/strong> &#8212; from comix-pop to painting paint to a swirling portrait of complexity, aka <em>tohu=bohu<\/em> ]<br \/>\n.<\/p>\n<p>Whoa boy, I had no idea <strong>Roy Lichtenstein<\/strong> ever painted anything like this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Lichtenstein-chaos.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"470\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-65455\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>I knew, of course, that he&#8217;d painted blown-up mersions of comic frames:<\/p>\n<blockquote><div id=\"attachment_65456\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65456\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-dog-fight.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"258\" class=\"size-full wp-image-65456\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-dog-fight.jpg 600w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-dog-fight-300x129.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-65456\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tate.org.uk\/art\/work\/T00897\">Whaam! 1963 Roy Lichtenstein<\/a> 1923-1997 Purchased 1966<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n<p>But that&#8217;s too easily &#8220;cool&#8221; to impress me much. Far more interesting is his painting of painting:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-painting-painting.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"537\" height=\"400\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-65457\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-painting-painting.jpg 537w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-painting-painting-300x223.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 537px) 100vw, 537px\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>He&#8217;s still doing a blow-up, in this case even more extreme than in his comic-book blow up <strong>Whaam<\/strong>, above &#8212; but this time it&#8217;s self-conscious, a painter taking paint for his subject, a serpent biting its own tail you might say, an exemplary <strong>ouroboros<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>And in the course of my quick search for <strong>Lichtenstein <\/strong>images, I also found this, which interests me as, potentially, an image of multiple musical voices intersecting and separating &#8212; a strange, wave-like form of polyphony: <\/p>\n<blockquote><div id=\"attachment_65460\" style=\"width: 550px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65460\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-composition-II.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" class=\"size-full wp-image-65460\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-composition-II.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-composition-II-300x236.jpg 300w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-composition-II-768x604.jpg 768w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/lichtenstein-composition-II-1024x805.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-65460\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Composition II 1996 Roy Lichtenstein 1923-1997 ARTIST ROOMS Tate and National Galleries of Scotland. Lent by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tate.org.uk\/art\/work\/AL00379\">The Roy Lichtenstein Foundation Collection<\/a> 2015<\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>\n<p>This in turn reminds me of the &#8220;wavy music&#8221; in <strong>Reynolds Stone<\/strong>&#8216;s bookplate for my aunt <strong>Esther<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/esther-darlington-reynolds-stone.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"345\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-65459\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>**\t \t<\/p>\n<p>But to return to that first image:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Lichtenstein-chaos.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"470\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-65455\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s an astonishing image of <em><strong>tohu-bohu<\/strong><\/em>, the &#8220;formless and void&#8221; just before creation as envisaged in Genesis. And here&#8217;s my point:<\/p>\n<p>This image is both <em><strong>patterned <\/strong><\/em>(with formal properties) and <em><strong>abstract<\/strong><\/em> (formless), as befits that <em><strong>great mirror<\/strong><\/em> in which all forms arise and fade away, and thus a superb image for <em><strong>complexity<\/strong><\/em>, which is both patterned like overlapping waves, and swirling beyond our comprehension..<\/p>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s <strong>R Cromb<\/strong>&#8216;s version of <em><strong>tohu-bohu<\/strong><\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/robert-crumb-tohu-wa-bohu.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"487\" height=\"669\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-65466\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/robert-crumb-tohu-wa-bohu.png 487w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/robert-crumb-tohu-wa-bohu-218x300.png 218w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 487px) 100vw, 487px\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And that of the Nuremberg Chronicle, 1493:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/588px-Nuremberg_chronicles_-_f_2v.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"440\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-65467\" srcset=\"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/588px-Nuremberg_chronicles_-_f_2v.png 588w, https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/588px-Nuremberg_chronicles_-_f_2v-294x300.png 294w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 588px) 100vw, 588px\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>**<\/p>\n<p>Ah, for a breath of theology hovering above the waters, see <a href=\"https:\/\/brainblizzarding.wordpress.com\/2012\/09\/24\/catherine-keller-a-theology-of-chaos-part-1\/\">Catherine Keller &#038; a theology of chaos, Part 1<\/a> and, no doubt, <strong>Catherine Keller<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Face-Deep-Theology-Becoming\/dp\/0415256496\">The Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ by Charles Cameron &#8212; from comix-pop to painting paint to a swirling portrait of complexity, aka tohu=bohu ] . Whoa boy, I had no idea Roy Lichtenstein ever painted anything like this: ** I knew, of course, that he&#8217;d painted blown-up mersions of comic frames: But that&#8217;s too easily &#8220;cool&#8221; to impress me much. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[556,384,1626,526,9,1687,480,1479,1933,1589,1934,1,1633],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-air-force","category-art","category-chaos","category-charles-cameron","category-complexity","category-mirror","category-music","category-ouroboros","category-paint","category-pop","category-tohu-bohu","category-uncategorized","category-void"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=65454"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65454\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65508,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65454\/revisions\/65508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=65454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=65454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=65454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}