{"id":7758,"date":"2012-04-11T05:49:24","date_gmt":"2012-04-11T05:49:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=7758"},"modified":"2012-04-11T05:55:47","modified_gmt":"2012-04-11T05:55:47","slug":"simultaneity-ii-the-pictorial-eye","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/?p=7758","title":{"rendered":"Simultaneity II: the pictorial eye"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ by Charles Cameron<\/strong> — when sequence becomes simultaneous, the pictorial eye, rethinking thinking, continuing from Simul I<\/a> ]
\n.<\/p>\n

What better day to begin writing this second post on simultaneity than the day on which Google celebrated the birthday of Eadweard Muybridge<\/strong> with a Google Doodle — not that I’ll get the post finished within those same 24 hours!<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The film — sequence of frames? stills? which would you call it? — that Muybridge took of a horse, used in that Google Doodle [view it in motion, here<\/a>], is celebrated as showing beyond a doubt that when galloping, all four of a horse’s hooves may be in the air at the same time.<\/p>\n

But is it — Muybridge’s work product — sequential<\/strong>, ie a film, or simultaneous<\/strong>, ie the presentation of many moments at one time?<\/p>\n

That question gets to the heart of an issue that all narrative faces, as we shall see. First, the pictorial side of things.<\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Hans Memling<\/strong>‘s Passion of Christ<\/em> (above) tells the gospel narrative, from Christ’s entry into Jerusalem and the Last Supper through his crucifixion, entombment and resurrection to his appearances in Emmaus and by the sea of Galilee in one canvas, much as Bach’s Matthew Passion<\/a> [link is to Harnoncourt <\/strong>video] tells major portions of the same narrative in three hours of unfolding musical drama.<\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

David Hockney<\/strong> has recently been working on forms of what I can only call “asynchronous synchrony” — as exemplified here:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
\nStills from Woldgate 7 November 2010 11:30 AM (left) and Woldgate 26 November 2010 11 AM (right). Credit: \u00a9David Hockney<\/em> <\/p>\n

This image comes from a fascinating article describing Hockney’s current work by Martin Gayford<\/strong>, titled The Mind’s Eye<\/a>, which you can find in MIT’s Technology Review, Sept\/Oct 2011:<\/p>\n

We are watching 18 screens showing high-definition images captured by nine cameras. Each camera was set at a different angle, and many were set at different exposures. In some cases, the images were filmed a few seconds apart, so the viewer is looking, simultaneously, at two different points in time. The result is a moving collage, a sight that has never quite been seen before. But what the cameras are pointing at is so ordinary that most of us would drive past it with scarcely a glance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As with the Muybridge video above, “the viewer is looking, simultaneously, at different points in time”. Here Hockney does this with video cameras — but he achieves something of the same effect of time-displacement with still photos, too, as you can see in his brilliant portrait of the sculptor Henry Moore<\/strong>, hosted on the British Council’s Venice Biennale<\/a> site.<\/p>\n

Here is Gayford’s concluding paragraph, tying Hockney’s work into the larger context of our need for multiple frames of reference: <\/p>\n

“Don’t we need people who can see things from different points of view?” Hockney asks. “Lots of artists, and all kinds of artists. They look at life from another angle.” Certainly, that is precisely what David Hockney is doing, and has always done. And yes, we do need it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

*<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Memling again — and here I have enlarged and “framed” four of the 23 scenes from the passion of Christ which he has incorporated in the one painting: the Last Supper, the Crowning with Thorns, the Crucifixion, the Resurrection — Thursday evening through Sunday, and from life to death and back again.<\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

It was Holy Week for Christians just last week, so perhaps you will forgive my having been preoccupied with images of the passion during the season set aside for such meditations — but what I want to point out to you is timeless, and indeed brings the transcendent into the everyday. Let’s take a look at a Hitchcock film next, then, and see how a contemporary videographer Jeff Desom<\/strong> has remixed the already Hockney-like Rear Window<\/a> [link to IMDb] to create his own time-lapse telling of the tale<\/a> [link to Vimeo], from which I took this screen-grab:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

Time-lapse — simultaneity? The philosopher Alfred North Whitehead<\/strong> once wrote:<\/p>\n

The communion of saints is a great and inspiring assemblage, but it has only one possible hall of meeting, and that is the present; and the mere lapse of time through which any particular group of saints must travel to reach that meeting-place, makes very little difference.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And so it is with this other Memling painting — and many others like it, by artists old and new:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Here we see the Virgin Mary<\/strong> and Christ<\/strong> child with Saints Dominic<\/strong> and James <\/strong>— there’s an eleven centuries gap right there, St Dominic lived from 1170 – 1221, more than a millennium after Christ — and Memling has St Dominic presenting his patron, the spice trader Jacques Floreins<\/strong> with his family to Christ, circa 1490. With everyone dressed in late 15th-century fashions…<\/p>\n

Whitehead — co-author with Bertie Russell<\/strong> of Principia Mathematica<\/em> — see how amazing this is? — could have been thinking of Memling: “the mere lapse of time through which any particular group of saints must travel to reach that meeting-place, makes very little difference”.<\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

Coming up next: how this affects our understanding of story.<\/p>\n

____________________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n

For an understanding of the setup David Hockney uses for his multiple-video takes, see here<\/a> and specifically this<\/a> and this<\/a>. For the setup used by Jeff Desom in his Rear Window<\/em> remix, see here<\/a> and specifically this<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[ by Charles Cameron — when sequence becomes simultaneous, the pictorial eye, rethinking thinking, continuing from Simul I ] . What better day to begin writing this second post on simultaneity than the day on which Google celebrated the birthday of Eadweard Muybridge with a Google Doodle — not that I’ll get the post finished […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[360,384,385,526,497,9,113,644,23,655,462,67,562,218,436,718,1,61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-21st-century","category-art","category-art-history","category-charles-cameron","category-christianity","category-complexity","category-framing","category-graphical-thinking","category-insight","category-mathematics","category-metacognition","category-movies","category-perception","category-philosophy","category-psychology","category-rethinking-thinking","category-uncategorized","category-visualization"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7758"}],"version-history":[{"count":48,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7758\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7839,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7758\/revisions\/7839"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zenpundit.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}