Grief and joy in shoes at mosque and church

[ by Charles Cameron — part for whole, what’s that called, synechdoche in Kabul, Houston ]

.

Shoes outside places of worship tell two very different tales in these two recent news photos.

Afghanistan

The shoes here are those left behind by worshippers who entered the Shiite mosque in Khair Khana area of Kabul, Afghanistan, which was blown up by ISIS. The death toll was 43 as I am writing this.

As day follows night follows day…

Houston, Texas:

This picture is of shoes donated for those in need of them at Joel Osteen‘s Lakewood Church, which had taken something of a PR beating after Osteen said it hadn’t been opened as a shelter because the authorities hadsn’t requested it — whereas many Houston area mosques were openws without any official request begind given.

Buzzfeed reported on the resentment of OSteen that may lie behind the criticisms leveled against him on this occasion:

The speed, tone, and volume of criticisms leveled against Osteen and Lakewood Church speak to the seriousness of the flooding crisis in Houston, but also to a larger powder keg of resentment directed at a particular strain of American Christianity — Osteen’s pro-wealth prosperity gospel, and the larger evangelical movement it’s associated with — that many see as failing to be charitable to people who are truly in need.

That’s worth pondering — the backlash in itself is a significant “marker” in the sociology of American religion.

WWJD? — Matthew 6.19-21, anyone? Where’s Osteen’s treasure?

**

Sources:

  • TRTWorld, At least 43 dead in Daesh-led attack on Shia mosque in Kabul
  • Buzzfeed News, The Joel Osteen Fiasco Says A Lot About American Christianity
  • ShiaWaves, Dozens of Houston Area Mosques are 24/7 Shelters without being Asked
    1. Grurray:

      I don’t much about Osteen, but I’ve heard from others that he never mentions Christ. This makes him an apostate in their view. I’m not qualified to judge him in those terms, but the Lord did say, ‘ye shall know them by their fruits’.
      If his followers are becoming poor – in spirit, in body, in material goods – then he deserves the criticism. If people really are becoming prosperous, happy, better adjusted, etc. then I don’t see any grounds to be judgmental. When someone is doing the right thing, even for the wrong reasons, there’s still a net gain of virtue in the world.

    2. Charles Cameron:

      Thanks. I haven’t done the empirical research, but appreciate your caution.