Year’s End Musings

The Atlantic has also been recapping past events and articles at year’s end. It struck me as wryly amusing that they made The Case for Humility in 1918, just before the end of WW I — with some surprisingly prescient commentary:

Before our educational system can furnish us the help that it should, the Humanist must learn … to abandon his faith in the mechanical and quantitative methods which belong to science, and to set about the task of reinstating the past in the present.

And again:

Examine the record of the nineteenth century, of the epoch which closed three years ago, and you will find that it is a record of increasing absent-mindedness on the part of men and nations who imagined that they were doing one thing but who were actually engaged in doing something else. They imagined that they were making the future secure by their feverish activity; they imagined that they had only to devote themselves to science and to industry in order to be happy. But, as a matter of fact, the whole tendency of their activity was to make the future insecure; and their blind faith in science and industry is being repaid by the unspeakable misery of war.

The Atlantic then brought us up to speed in 2014 with The Case for Corruption: Why Washington needs more honest graft:

Once upon a time, the budget process was reasonably regular. In fact, it was conducted under what was called regular order. The budget-committee chairmen would do some horse trading to build a consensus within each chamber, the House and Senate would then pass those budgets without too much ado, and the two chambers would work out their differences in a conference committee. Then the appropriations committees would do more or less the same thing, making sure to spread around enough pork-barrel goodies to get their friends paid off and the budget passed. The president and the congressional leaders would be involved throughout the process, every now and then calling a budget summit, but most of the real work would go on behind the scenes.

In the past few years, by contrast, regular order has been replaced by regular chaos. Public ultimatums supplanted private negotiations, games of chicken replaced mutual back-scratching, and bumptious Republican House members took to dictating terms to their putative leadership. Last fall, after one tantrum too many, Congress seemed exhausted. As part of a deal to reopen the government, it returned the task of setting the next fiscal year’s budget to the budget and appropriations committees, sending them off to a smoke-free smoke-filled room to cut a deal.

Sigh — one can’t help smiling at that phrase, “a smoke-free smoke-filled room” — beautifully, concisely, evocatively boustrophedonic!

**

Boustrophedon — to and fro, as the ox ploughs — oh joy!

Happy New Year to all!

Page 2 of 2 | Previous page

  1. Scott:

    I was into the whole end times thing 20 years ago and it’s what got me into international affairs. However, getting into international affairs quickly showed me how ridiculous most end times prophecy interpretations really were.
    .
    Leaving eschatological prophecies aside, I have no problem as a Christian recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. It was 2500 years ago (this has been established by archaeological evidence. Palestine didn’t come along until the Roman occupation, approximately 2050 years ago. The Canaanites and Philistines were NOT Palestinian. Most Palestinians today are descended from the Muslims that invaded the area 1300 years ago anyway.

  2. Charles Cameron:

    Thre’s religion, and there’s genetics — and my own sympathies are for the two (or three) major religions involved, with a dab of critical thinking from the bio-historical side..

  3. Cheryl Rofer:

    If this is a jubilee year, I’m looking forward to the erasure of debts. All those young people need the kind of start in life that I had.

  4. Charles Cameron:

    You — and Trump too, for that matter — missed the Jubilee Year, which ended yesterday, — according to John Hagee. Best ask Pope Francis and see what can be arranged.

  5. Charles Cameron:

    A Jerusalem embassy footnote from the contested Wolff book:

    Wolff opens his book with a scene that illustrates this tendency: at a dinner party after the election, a worried Roger Ailes, of Fox News, who, according to Wolff, “was convinced that Trump had no political beliefs or backbone,” talks to Bannon about the plan to move the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. “Does Donald know?” Ailes asks. Bannon replies with a smile and “almost with a wink.”

    Via Amy Davidson Sorkin in The New Yorker, Looking for a Stable Genius for President.