The United States does not need to bow to the demands of kangaroo courts run by Transnational Progressives any more than we should grant manipulated and incomplete data scientific credibility. Or attempt a systemic solution for the planet only within the borders of the United States. We need to call such things what they are – a hostile and dishonest bid for power moved by the Spirit of Tyranny- by a small class of networked international activists.

When people propose solutions that do not address a problem and lie about their justifications we can be pretty sure they wish us nothing but harm.

Page 3 of 3 | Previous page

  1. Marc Schulman:

    Mark,

    A great post. If you haven’t seen it, you should read John Fonte’s “Liberal Democracy vs. Transnational Progressivism,” available at

    http://www.hudson.org/files/publications/idealogical_war.pdf

    Have a Happy New Year!

    Warm Regards,

    Marc

  2. mark:

    Marc,

    Thank you and thanks for the tip which I will pass on to Geitner whose interest in the malevoleny antics of the Trans-Progs predates my own.

    Happy New Year to you as well !

  3. Dave Schuler:

    Steve Verdon posted on this a while back. I’ll repeat the comments I made over on his site: contemporary Inuit (Eskimo is considered pejorative) don’t live a traditional lifestyle: they live in fixed settlements, use snowmobiles, and hunt for the fur trade. This is rent-seeking pure and simple.

    Is anyone entitled to a lifestyle? To whom does such a right belong and when does it begin? In my grandfather’s day minorities had few rights, there were very few women in the workplace, and cars had a fuel economy of 8 miles per gallon. Do we have a right to return to such a lifestyle now? Why not?

  4. mark:

    Dave,

    Excellent point.

    Perhaps we should all get to pick our own state subsidized lifesyle. I’m going to opt for a Turkish Sultan…though an English Dukedom would also be appealing.

  5. Anonymous:

    Sorry, I am afraid I find this entirely off base.

    First, of course, there are perfectly clear treaty negotiating reasons for the differential between developed and developing nations. Second, there are perfectly good economic reasons for doing so as well (marginal cost of implementation, expected capital resources), so characterizing the differential as some kind of conspiratorial tax on the US and growth is half way daft.

    Now, at the same time, I agree that Kyoto is not a well designed treaty and rather should have been reworked.

    Second, the long quote from Lobos is …. well hardly the material of a real scientist in tone or content of rebuttal [Lobos seems to be a physicist] (e.g. a white Xmas in Texas is not in any way relevant to rebutting the general consensus on global warming). Lobos’ characterizations are… extreme and in my read, unfounded (ex as directed at the popularizing NGO Hard Greenies, admittedly the actual focus of much of the comment). As far as my read goes, the consensus is fairly robust; the conclusions about what to do do, of course are something rather more dodgey to my read.

    Overall, I have to say this is more than slightly over the top and subpar for you.

    Col

  6. Anonymous:

    Mark, I was with you up until you started quoting Lubos. I’m sure he’s a smart guy and all, but there really is not a lot of substance to his arguments. And I say this as someone who’s skeptical of claims that climate change is primarily being driven by humans (and who is dead-set against Kyoto).

    — Matt McIntosh

  7. mark:

    Ah, I relish criticism :O)

    Col,

    I think in terms of marginal cost, encouraging polluters to relocate to China and India is a particularly bad ecological strategy. These countries are attractive enough in terms of comparative advantage in labor costs without adding further incentives to industrial ” bad actors”.

    Dual standards that encourage building up large industries in relatively poor( per capita) and exceedingly populous countries where they did not previously exist helps delay high environmental standards there as long as possible. It does not help a global ecosystem to require Americans to be bailing water twice as fast in the lifeboat if the Indians and Chinese are going to be drilling more holes. Many, many more holes. Better ( and cheaper) that we invest/subsidize upfront in high standards for new industries everywhere than try to clean them up after the fact.

    Col & Matt,

    Lubos was being very breezy and partisan in his attack on RealClimate because they are extreme greens and are not making scientific arguments anyway, by his standards ( Harvard theoretical physicist). If you read him regularly he’s usually on a more serious plane in most of his posts.

    That was one of my more partisan and less serious posts I’ll agree and I was probably more incensed by the transnational progressive tactics of suing the United States over Kyoto than by anything else.

    If you are interested in a more temperate and serious post on the topic of Global warming and Kyoto regs, Becker and Posner ( blogroll) are on the same issue this week which I meant to link to and excerpt to but I simply ran out of time. Perhaps I’ll update later today.

  8. TM Lutas:

    The TCS people covering COP-10 are saying that everybody, even the EU tranzi crowd are coming to the realization that Kyoto’s a failure and that there will be no Kyoto II. Nobody’s actually following the thing and they can’t keep straight faces to negotiate a successor. All that’s left is a holding action on the politics and education, education, education on the science.

  9. Anonymous:

    Hey, you have a great blog here! I’m definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a Free site Free Article Search. It pretty much covers computer article related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time 🙂

  10. gesticulatively resources:

    I was looking for a place to submit my human resource management article and stumbled across your blog. I enjoy reading blogs with my coffe in the morning before work. its fun to see whats up with people around the world.

    Anyway, I did find a free blog and article submission site here Site Submit/Article Submission

    Anyway, I enjoyed your blog. Have a nice day : )

  11. gesticulatively resources:

    I was looking for a place to submit my accounting article and stumbled across your blog. I enjoy reading blogs with my coffe in the morning before work. its fun to see whats up with people around the world.

    Anyway, I did find a free blog and article submission site here Site Submit/Article Submission

    Anyway, I enjoyed your blog. Have a nice day : )

  12. Allergy Relief:

    Hey, nice blog and great info!
    Here’s my new submit article
    site for people wanting information on submit article
    . This is the site to visit.
    Come and check it out if you get time I would really appreciate it 🙂

  13. Kim:

    Hey, I came by actually looking for a specific blog but got yours instead. However, you seem to have a great blog here!

    I have a article spyware submit site. It pretty much is about article spyware submit .

    Come and take a look if you get time 🙂

  14. Anonymous:

    I just came across your Blog about Bearded Collie and wanted to drop you a note to tell you how impressed I was with the information you have provided here. I also have a website and blog about Bearded Collieso I know what I am talking about when I say your is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the internet.

  15. Anonymous:

    It’s tough finding good ge consumer finance information like this. Have a look here ge consumer finance for some more good stuff if you get a chance.

  16. Brian:

    Hey, you have a great blog here! I’m definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a internet dental marketing site/blog. It pretty much covers internet dental marketing related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time 🙂

  17. Anonymous:

    Thanks for the blog. While I was cruising the net, I found your blog on article free health submission. There is an article directory that has good information on article free health submission. You can find it here at article free health submission I will be back to this blog again.
    Thanks, Larry