A footnote to a benchmark in boundless cyberspace
Let’s call it a benchmark — and while this business about A Balkhi may be just a detail, benchmarks are go-tos, and I hope Alex will update his.
Page 2 of 2 | Previous page
Let’s call it a benchmark — and while this business about A Balkhi may be just a detail, benchmarks are go-tos, and I hope Alex will update his.
Page 2 of 2 | Previous page
Critt Jarvis:
June 24th, 2012 at 1:39 pm
Very cool, Charles!
Polanyi writes of stereoscopic viewing in his essays “Tacit Knowing” (Knowing and Being, pg 167-168) and “The Structure of Consciousness” (K&B, pg 211-13) Snip, “… The fusion of two stereoscopic pictures to a single spatial image is not the outcome of an argument; and if its result is illusory, as it well can be, it will not be shaken by argument. The fusion of the clues to to image on which they bear is not a deduction but an integration.”
On stereo thinking:
June 24th, 2012 at 8:15 pm
[…] From Zenpundit: […]
Charles Cameron:
June 24th, 2012 at 10:45 pm
Thanks, Critt:
.
I’ve made use of part of my post along with your comment in a post at Sembl.