Form is insight: the funnel, part 2

Reading Obama yields a similar effect. In 2009, literary critic Andrew Delbanco pointed out in the New Republic that Obama’s books are populated by counterweighted sentences, for instance: “There’s the middle-aged feminist who still mourns her abortion, and the Christian woman who paid for her teenager’s abortion.” Obama expresses his worldview, Delbanco wrote, in sentences “organized around pairs of sentiments or arguments that exert equal force against each other–a reflection of ongoing thinking rather than a statement of settled thoughts.”

To me, that’s reassuring: the issue can still be complex as it reaches the President’s mind, even if his decision and command has to be given in a single, definitive word.

**

What happens if an impoverished understanding is at work, the wrong answer is given, the wrong decision taken? HL Mencken to the rescue with this dismal truth:

For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong.

**

And finally — where are we now?

I’ll take my answer from a series of tweets Aaron Zelin made earlier today:

Al-Qaeda has never been dead, neither have they ever been resurgent. They’ve always just hovered. Nimble, patient, and exploitative. The problem is, we are always one step behind, we were fighting the AQ of 9/11 for yrs, now we are fighting the AQ of 2009-2011. As we have changed our tactics they have changed, too. AQ and its affiliates now are not the same as they once were.

Page 3 of 3 | Previous page

  1. Mr. X:

    speaking of shapes and what they represent, I hope Charles Cameron will have a look at this chart based on a Swiss study portraying the 147 multinationals, led by the banks, said to rule the world:

    http://intellectualodditiesnetwork.com/showthread.php?tid=14633&pid=125003

    As the boss man said in Network (1977), “there are no Russians, there are no Americans, there are no Arabs, there is only Union Carbide, DuPont, and Exxon”.

  2. Mr. X:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI5hrcwU7Dk
    Here’s the link to the Network clip 

  3. Charles Cameron:

    Thanks. Mr X.  
    .
    Paddy Chayefsky had an amazing knack for powerful, pithy speeches, eh?
    .
    The reason the graphic you offer isn’t one I would include in this series has nothing to do with the image’s actual value, it’s that I’m trying to present patterns that analysts can recognize in a wide diversity of fields, and which will prove useful memory-hinges for capturing the meaningful in an otherwise inchoate mass of data.  So while that particular graphic is interesting when filled with the names of the relevant multinationals, it’s not a “pattern” for other insights.  
    .
    It’s patterns and human pattern-recognition I’m after. 

  4. Mr. X:

    No problem Charles, but I’m sure you’ve noticed that this study came from Switzerland, where they’re drilling suddenly like it’s 1941.