Anne Smedinghoff Didn’t Have to Die Part 2

Once we were able to make contact with the recommended leaders, we were careful to explain the agenda, set up appointments, and accommodate their schedules as best as possible.  We never showed up unannounced, or uninvited.  With the safety of all involved in mind, we took time to determine their preferred place of meeting, which was critical considering that we lived on an American forward operating base, and could move in heavily protected convoys.  We were remarkably “safer” than those leaders, as they lived in constant threat.  We displayed a respect for their safety when we considered their venue preference.  While these logistical steps seem obvious, we found this level of respect nonexistent in DoS, PRT and US forces attempting to work with local leaders, again relying on domination to achieve goals; US forces prefer to show up unannounced, unscheduled and take over the Afghan leader’s schedule as we set fit.  

When we met, the recommended leaders were also accompanied by multiple religious elders.  We didn’t ask them to do this, by the way, but it was something that was required in their culture.  This was also an indicator to us that we approached the problem from the most culturally appropriate angle known to us (and recommended by our Afghan partner who originally set us up for success).  Afghan leaders, when not influenced by Americans, will have a religious leader (mullah) present as they make decisions.  

Over the course of several meetings, and after deliberation between the MoE and other family and religious leaders, we were able to ascertain what was expected in terms of US assistance.  Keep in mind that what we were also doing was helping to link family, religious, and political leaders with a valid MoE backed plan to improve education throughout all of Zabul province; a critical element of creating stability wins.  

These leaders never asked for money. They never asked us to build another school.  They recognized that we could help, and they also wanted us to help them determine if these programs were working.  They knew we had the capacity, which they knew they did not, to help them measure the success of the program.  

What is most telling is that these leaders noted a lack of security, which is a common theme throughout my time in conflicted areas.  Security concerns are superior, and every other effort is subordinate.  This is where you need to pay attention DoS–The MoE asked that he never be seen engaging with the US at his office, as US patrols could only expose him to harm, he and other leaders wanted to reduce the amount of contact between US forces and their children for the same reason.  Moreover, leaders in the district wanted us in the background, as they wanted to see the Afghan government and the MoE doing their job.  They wanted the people living in Zabul Province to see the same–This is setting the stage for believable, culturally based stability win…and there is no photo op.

Our work established the beginnings of a clear plan that meets the requirements for creating stability. It satisfies a test we developed that indicates potential success when conducting non-lethal missions or operations…Is the operation Afghan inspired, Afghan led, Afghan provisioned, and sanctioned by a Mullah?  

Is it possible that if DoS had bothered to teach Anne this test or heed our report, that she would still be alive?

Page 2 of 2 | Previous page

  1. Grurray:

    No doubt she would have been alive had the imbeciles listened. The idiot ambassador got his press secretary killed for some kind of vanity project.
    She was clearly a rising star in the ranks. It says on her wikipedia page that she escorted Kerry around Kabul during his visit just a couple weeks prior to her death.
    Maybe she got this doomed assignment because she was expected to repeat that high profile assistance for her underling boss? I guess we’ll never know
    .
    Regardless of how badly the diplomats botched it, the security was inexcusable.
    This was from the army report in one of the links from part 1:
    .
    “They were caught in the initial blast at about 11 a.m., when a remote-controlled bomb hidden under a pallet that was leaned up against the base’s southern wall detonated.

    Five to 10 seconds after that initial blast, a man driving a blue Toyota — who the report states had been shooed away from the gate when the group was leaving the base — drove within the formation of soldiers and civilians and blew up his car, gravely injuring Smedinghoff, the interpreter and the three soldiers, among others”
    .
    She was killed right outside the base.
    The Guardian article said it wasn’t uncommon to “walk short distances near bases where security is considered relatively good, particularly when there are checkpoints on access roads and US spy blimps that can survey the area around the clock.”
    I suppose the spy blimps must have been grounded that day. My question for Pete is how often did you stroll around Qalat?

  2. Pete:

    I didn’t cover the tactical portions of the story for a few reasons…I will say this. The imminent threat of a large scale attack was known. The PRT detail missed their “pattern of life” indicators–there is NEVER going to be a pallet leaned up against anything. A pallet to us is junk…to an Afghan that’s a pile of money just left about. Given the day’s threat assessment…the known presence of a VBIED cell…then the pallet…that right there should have changed the nature of that patrol. I could go on, but that is a different post. Bottom line…they never should have been on that particular patrol.

    Someone used their rank/influence to ensure that mission happened and that changed the tactical decision making…