zenpundit.com » 2003 » April

Archive for April, 2003

Wednesday, April 16th, 2003

READING THE RITING ON THE WALL I would like to thank Riting on the Wall for adding Zenpundit to their blogroll. It’s a thoughtful site; here’s a sample:

“why have more hope for iran than your average middle eastern country?

simple. they’ve figured out schizophrenic politics.

ok, not simple.

by no stretch of the imagination are all iranians duly and accurately represented in any sort of power-proportionate manner in the government. that is, some people’s views are way, way better represented than others’, while a few are left out entirely. this is not an ideal situation. i could note that truly power-proportionate representation doesn’t exist anywhere for any number of reasons, but at least grant me that iran is further off than western democracies.

however, it’s also considerably more representative than most countries in the middle east, especially the former iraqi regime and the existing pseudo-totalitarian states (like saudi arabia). while that’s not a huge accomplishment, it does point to the fact that there’s something fundamentally different in a state that allows internal and public opposition within the regime and even a limited seperation of powers from, say, an absolute monarchy or a totalitarian ba’athist dictatorship where opinion is set by decree and expected to be propogated as absolute.

following iranian politics casually can be frustrating for this reason, too. not only is there a fairly (relatively) wide variety of of opinions coming from both official and unofficial sources (unlike jordan or syria), but the opinions don’t really fit neatly on an axis (unlike egypt). it’s totally possible to get reactions from khamenei, khatami and rafsanjani that are completely unrelated (that is, not two “poles” and a middle ground); they are coming at reality from such radically different angles that they can’t be idealized and slotted in to fixed categories. factor in more radical elements and you’ll have no clue what “iran thinks”.

which is good. if you can look at a country and automatically see where, as a whole, it’s headed, then it lacks a vibrant political life (ie: kazakhstan).

iran, on the other hand, is confusing, speaking from all sorts of angles that cannot be simultaneously held: schizophrenia.

at least there’s a reason to hope.”



And he’s right.

Wednesday, April 16th, 2003

GEITNER SIMMONS NAILS IT on the transnationalist activities of NGO’s which are acquiring a tendency to act in concert to devalue traditional concepts of sovereignty and assert the juridical ” superiority ” of unaccountable international institutions over American Constitutional procedures. It’s a dangerous and highly undemocratic movement that so far, has managed to operate ” off -radar “. That may soon be changing as I see the story has already spread to Donald Sensing’s blog as well. Can the mainstream press be far behind ?

Wednesday, April 16th, 2003

AN EXCELLENT COLUMN by John Leo

Wednesday, April 16th, 2003

A FEW WORDS FROM BILL CLINTON

“We can’t run,” Clinton pointed out. “If you got an interdependent world, and you cannot kill, jail or occupy all your adversaries, sooner or later you have to make a deal.”

Like with North Korea in 1994 perhaps ? How about when an unfriendly regime, seeking to curry favor with the U.S., offers to hand over a master terrorist ? That might have been a good time for Clintonian deal-making…at least from the perspective of a few thousand who died as a result.

Tuesday, April 15th, 2003

THE NATION – A MAGAZINE IMPERVIOUS TO REALITY

From the editorial page of the Nation online. Suggestions for a UN role in Iraq comprising duties the UN has repeatedly proven incompetent at administering:

“Also, the UN would be a more legitimate governing power in Iraq than either a US proconsul or a handpicked government; a UN security force could better deal with the growing breakdown of law and order than a military government, which is likely to ignite smoldering anger in the Arab world. A US-occupied Iraq could become a target for attacks and guerrilla actions by Arab fighters; resentment against Washington could eclipse democracy on the Middle Eastern agenda, and anti-US fury could recruit hundreds of terrorists determined to avenge the Arab world’s humiliation in Iraq. Furthermore, a unilateral occupation will cost untold billions, becoming a drag on the US economy. Finally, only UN inspectors, who should be returned to Iraq immediately, will be able to credibly identify hidden stocks of chemical or biological weapons, the ostensible reason for the US invasion. “

No thanks guys, all you really care about is putting into place a method by which to obstruct a Bush administration-led reconstruction of Iraq. Let the UN hand out wheat and free innoculations. We’ll handle the rest just fine on our own.


Switch to our mobile site