February 23rd, 2005
SOUNDS LIKE THEY REALLY DO HATE OUR FREEDOM REDUX
Collounsbury’s Livejournal site is not accepting comments for some reason but he did have a link to Abu Aardvark on Arab reaction on al-Jazeerah to Zawahiri’s latest anti-democracy rant.
The last group to mount so straightforward an attack on liberal democracy as a concept were the Nazis. The Stalinists, being more cautious than the National Socialists and wanting to encourage the willing suspension of disbelief by useful idiots in the West, appropriated
” democracy” as an Orwellian gloss for their form of totalitarianism. Democracy carries with it implications of political legitimacy that are now almost universally recognized and al Qaida is now very clearly its enemy. The ” Zarqawization” of al Qaida continues apace.
Zawahiri’s put himself in an ideological corner that not even all Islamists are going to find defensible. Nice to see that the other side makes its own militantly stupid moves on occasion.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
February 23rd, 2005
JOHN BOYD’S MAGNUM OPUS
I’m nearing the end of Robert Coram’s bio of maverick fighter pilot turned theorist, John Boyd. Had Tom Barnett not endorsed the significance of Boyd’s contribution to military thought I’d have probably tossed the book on my towering ” to be read eventually” pile with no particular hurry to get to it. Reading Coram’s book, which is, as praktike had commented, somewhat light, spurred me to take a firsthand look at Boyd’s work, so I found a copy of his paper/brief ” Destruction and Creation”.
The man was a visionary genius. We should all see so far.
(straight text version here).
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
February 22nd, 2005
THE WINGNUTS TURN ON HILLARY
Dan at tdaxp stomached a tour of the Hate-America fest known as the Democratic Underground and discovered that Hillary Clinton is now considered a ” war criminal “.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
February 22nd, 2005
GEORGE BUSH WORLD TOUR
Dave Schuyler at The Glittering Eye has an excellent post up on the motivations for George Bush’s fence-mending tour ( note the Chirac-Bush lovefest) to Old Europe.
“…So why has Bush gone to Europe? I think there are three reasons. First, half a loaf is better than none. Anything that Europe can bring to the party will be gratefully received. Second, when the French and Germans stiff him (as they undoubtedly will), they will look churlish. This won’t go un-noted in New Europe. For New (or Old) Europeans who aren’t predisposed to despise anything American this may be a very important trip particularly if, as some have predicted, the European Union collapses within 15 years.
But Bush is a politician and the third and, in my opinion, most significant reason for Mr. Bush’s Grand Tour must certainly be for domestic political consumption. What might the domestic political considerations for this trip be? He may be trying to demonstrate that he’s doing his utmost on the diplomatic front. This should strengthen his hand for whatever actions are required as future events unfold. And there’s a lot of unfolding going on. “
Agreed.
My expectations bar for the Germans and French is a low one. Paris and Berlin will pursue their own perceived national interests, much of which involves acting as a self-appointed, soft-power, balance to American primacy. However, there still remain fairly large areas for cooperation in mutual interest ( getting the Syrians out of the Bekaa for one) and trips such as these smooth the path. As irritating as French Gaullist and German leftist politicians can be, so long as their envy and anti-Americanism continues to be expressed selectively, we can count on them to help us when it is in their selfish interests to do so.
I also recommend checking out the American Future for Marc Shulman’s coverage of the Bush trip.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
February 21st, 2005
NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
On a lark, I checked out some handguns today. When I was quite young, I was a crack shot with a small-bore rifle and was in a gun club that produced at least two national champions and one West Pointer. However, I haven’t fired a gun of any kind in at least 15 years. I don’t have any interest in hunting per se but I would like to try my hand again at some targets, this time with a pistol.
Wandering around Gander Mountain amongst taciturn men with beards dressed in camouflage I found a prodigious display of Smith & Wesson automatics of various calibers with a company representative on hand. What caught my eye, though, were the blocky Taurus .44 magnums. A lot of heft and their .45 was even larger – if just waving this pistol didn’t scare away an intruder you could probably kill them simply by throwing it at their head.
Frankly, not being a ” gun nut” and not really know that much about the fine points of handguns and since I’ll need to apply for a FOID card first, I’m going to take my sweet time reading up before shelling out ( pun intended) $ 500-$800 for essentially a new and time-consuming amusement. If there are any gun aficianados out there with recommendations for something reliable, I’m all ears.
Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments »