zenpundit.com » Blog Archive » Zenpundit Op-ed at Pajamas Media

Zenpundit Op-ed at Pajamas Media

I have an op-ed/article up this morning at Pajamas Media on the Culberson-Capuano internet rules dispute:

Congress Debates Muzzling Congressmen Online

….There is certainly a legitimate and longstanding interest in preventing the misuse of federal employees or funds by prohibiting them from having any connection to campaign activities, a point on which Republicans and Democrats can easily agree. Furthermore, Capuano is correct to call the current rules “antiquated” and more restrictive, on paper at least, than his proposals. However, the old rules have been widely ignored by congressmen and have never been enforced, which left members of the House free to post online and engage in virtual interaction as they pleased. Enforcing the new, somewhat milder restrictions, as Capuano intends to do, amounts to a severe regime of prior restraint on speech.

More ominous still would be the precedent of the U.S. government designating “official” external websites – imagine having the power to select “official” newspapers – that would have to hew to House regulations and be as free as possible from political or commercial advertising. Given the ubiquity of blogads, most blogs, bulletin boards, and discussion forums would be shut out of the conversation with our nation’s elected officials. Essentially, Capuano is demanding that the internet adapt itself to the House of Representatives instead of the House adapting to the reality of the internet.

Read the rest here.

In addition to the posts on this issue this weekend by Matt Stoller and Mark Tapscott, my friend Lexington Green points to this new piece calling for a bipartisan coalition by Patrick Ruffini at The Next Right.

8 Responses to “Zenpundit Op-ed at Pajamas Media”

  1. deichmans Says:

    Nice, balanced Op-Ed, Zen.

  2. zen Says:

    Gracias brother Wizard. I tried to elevate the discourse from my initial rant. 🙂

  3. Smitten Eagle Says:

    Solid op/ed, zen.  Congrats on syndication at PajamasMedia.

  4. Mark Tapscott Says:

    Excellent piece on PJM, especially your suggestion that hearings include social media experts on the witness list.

  5. zen Says:

    Hi SM,
    Thanks – great reading program post on your part BTW. Glad you reposted that at Chicago Boyz.
    Hi Mark,
    Thank you very much – I appreciate that and your weighing on in this issue. It really helps when ppl higher up the  media-blog food chain like yourself get the message out.

  6. Lexington Green Says:

    Wow, great new venue.

    On what meat is this our Zenpundit fed, that he hath grown so great?

    Good to see it. 

    Also, as noted above, good to see your sane and measured treatment of this serious issue. 

  7. Shlok Says:


  8. zen Says:

    Much thanks guys! It is appropriate for me to say that I had help, starting with every blogger and writer who piled on – Dan of tdaxp being the first – to those like Bruce Kesler, Pundita, Jonathan and Selil who each added extra oomph through their own network of contacts or leveraging of internet platforms like Slashdot.  Without their efforts the effectiveness of the outcry would have been far less than it was and I’m grateful for their aid.

Switch to our mobile site