Intelligence vs the Artificial
[ by Charles Cameron — who believes that detours are the spice of life ]
.
Craig Kaplan:
Maurits Escher:
**
There’s a fasacinating article about Craig Kaplan and his work with tiling that I came across today, Crazy paving: the twisted world of parquet deformations — I highly recommend it to anyone interested in pattern — and I highly recommend anyone uninterested in pattern to get interested!
Kaplan himself is no stranger to Escher’s work, obviously enough — he’s even written a paper, Metamorphosis in Escher’s Art — the abstract reads:
M.C. Escher returned often to the themes of metamorphosis and deformation in his art, using a small set of pictorial devices to express this theme. I classify Escher’s various approaches to metamorphosis, and relate them to the works in which they appear. I also discuss the mathematical challenges that arise in attempting to formalize one of these devices so that it can be applied reliably.
I mean Kaplan no dishonor, then, when I say that his algorithmic tilings, as seen in the upper panel above, still necessarily lack something that his mentor’s images have, as seen in the lower panel — a quirky willingness to go beyond pattern into a deeper pattern, as when the turreted outcropping of a small Italian town on the Amalfi coast becomes a rook in the game of chess…
**
Comparing one with the other, I am reminded of the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches to understanding, of SIGINT and HUMINT in terms of the types of intelligence collected — and at the philosophical limit, of the very notions of quantity and quality.
J.ScottShipman:
January 16th, 2015 at 1:58 am
Charles,
.
Excellent, sir! I’ve a long overdue post on patterns and cognition—you’ve inspired me yet again!
Charles Cameron:
January 16th, 2015 at 2:13 am
Thanks, Scott.
.
I look forward to your piece!
zen:
January 16th, 2015 at 5:09 am
And in HUMINT itself there’s plenty of distinctions.
.
The kind of intel collected from deep cover clandestinity vs. Official diplo spies. In the former case, deep cover operations are often used:
.
To avoid detection
To avoid identification even when detected ( providing “plausible deniability” )
To facilitate the commission of illicit acts or establish relationships under false pretenses
To conduct covert surveillance
To collect secret information of strategic significance (i.e. – espionage)
To facilitate long term influence operations over years or decades.
.
Clandestinity can yield different, sometimes unique intel not available through OSINT, liasioning, recruitment by diplo cover spies where the target is aware they are being recruited by a foreign power
zen:
January 16th, 2015 at 5:19 am
Also this….
.
http://ciceromagazine.com/opinion/organizational-drift-why-u-s-intelligence-missed-the-rise-of-isis/
.
Which I think is parochial. The CIA has capacity for special action not because it is necessary for the CIA but because it is useful for the United States to place these paramilitary capabilities in non-military hands for diplomatic, legal, political and redundancy reasons
Charles Cameron:
January 16th, 2015 at 4:09 pm
Hi Zen:
.
I like Col. Lisagor’s comment that CIA has moved, as Charles Cogan puts it, from a ‘gathering’ to a ‘hunting’ culture”, and his own conclusion that “CIA should put the meat-eaters on a leaner diet and return to a ‘gatherer’ culture.
.
Having said that, I must take issue with his version of Islamic history. He writes:
I suggest he has things mixed up in terms of elective and familial succession.
.
The transmission of power in the Islamic world is not an area in which I have much knowledge, but it seems to me that there are four ways in which the role of caliph may be acquired:
.
by appointment by the previous caliph
by election by suitable electors within the community
by familial descent
by force
.
Of the four Rashidun Caliphs of the Sunni, Abu Bakr was elected, Umar was appointed by Aby Bakr, and Uthman and Aliwere elected.
.
A Shia hadith says:
Thus the Sunni Rashidun caliphs were appointed or elected, while it was the Sunni Imams who had to be descendants of Ali, and thus of the Family of the Prophet (Ahl al-Bayt).
.
Establishing a caliphate by force is obviously not a matter of descent, appointment or election, but the Islamic world tends to understand the importance of “powers that be” — so when force has been used and rulership established, if my reading is correct, authorities from Ibn Hanbal to Ibn Khaldun agree that the Caliph should be obeyed.
Scott:
January 16th, 2015 at 4:21 pm
Charles,
.
I assume you’ve read Godel, Escher, Bach by Hofstadter? If not, I assure you that you might find it very interesting.
Charles Cameron:
January 16th, 2015 at 4:59 pm
Yes indeed, Scott, I know Godel, Escher, Bach, though there are parts of it I’ve browsed rather than read! And there are other works of his that deal directly with my interest in metaphor and analogy — fascinating guy!
.
BTW, I have another Escher-related post coming up shortly.