The Death of King Abdullah in three tweets
[ by Charles Cameron — always amazed at the way “end times” considerations find their way into so many areas of geopolitics ]
.
One can take the line De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.. which I rconfess I like..
Obituary: Saudi King Abdullah, seen as a reformer & vocal advocate of peace in Middle East http://t.co/UtA2v9wurO pic.twitter.com/lyrvoNGX16
— BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) January 22, 2015
One can take the line Veritas vos liberabit.. which I also favor, as does the CIA..
#Saudi King Abdullah dies. He leaves a dreadful human rights legacy. http://t.co/LO1cVkZB1N pic.twitter.com/kEHl8OUB7t
— Patrick Corrigan (@PatrickCorrigan) January 22, 2015
But as one might have guessed, my own final preference goes to omnium autem finis adpropinquavit..
my piece in @AlMonitor Some Shiites believe that the #Saudi king's death will signal the beginning of the end-times http://t.co/VJ7a9z6S6w
— Rohollah Faghihi (@FaghihiRohollah) January 22, 2015
Now there‘s a surprise!
**
I hope to look into this third, specifically Mahdist interpretation of King Abdullah‘s death in a bit more detail in a subsequent post.
January 23rd, 2015 at 6:46 pm
I had forgotten that in a post titled King Abdullah’s health and the Signs of the Times back in 2010 I had written:
Hat-tip to Brian Hubbs for reminding me in a tweet to Tim Furnish.