zenpundit.com » 2008

Archive for 2008

Recommended Reading

Monday, September 15th, 2008

Top Billing! Presentation Zen John McCain’s background visuals and Obama delivers speech like a symphony

Garr Reynolds analyzes the visual and staging  atmospherics and structural presentations ( not the content) of the convention acceptance speeches and makes suggestions for improvement.

Wizards of OzLHC: Game On!

After the U.S. Congress moronically killed off the half-finished Superconducting Super Collider in the 90’s to save a few billion that they promptly spent filling in the giant tunnel again, the LHC represents the largest experimental step forward in investigating particle physics that we are likely to see for years.

Valdis Krebs –  How do good practices spread and become transformative?

Michael Scheuer Playing With Fire: Pakistan’s Unintended Strategic Challenge in India’s Homeland

Claremont Institute There He Goes Again: A Review of The Age of Reagan

Foreign PolicySeven Questions: Reading the Tea Leaves in Pyongyang

That’s it!

Dang

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

Check this out.  Points to several new books for the pile.

OSINT CON Links

Saturday, September 13th, 2008

Michael Tanji sums up his views on the recent DNI OSINT conference that he and other blogfriends attended in Washington, DC.

Official DNI OSINT blog can also be consulted ( hat tip to Suki Fuller)

Remembering

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Today we are not Democrats or Republicans, conservatives or liberals but Americans. Let us remember what was lost today seven years ago but also look forward, with hope and confidence, in the future of our country.

Wired for Hierarchy ?

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Here’s an interesting bit of research: the human brain appears to have a serious bias toward hierarchical structures that makes issues of status and rank a distracting and destabilizing variable:

Human Brain Appears “Hard-Wired” for Hierarchy

Human imaging studies have for the first time identified brain circuitry associated with social status, according to researchers at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) of the National Institutes of Health. They found that different brain areas are activated when a person moves up or down in a pecking order – or simply views perceived social superiors or inferiors. Circuitry activated by important events responded to a potential change in hierarchical status as much as it did to winning money.

“Our position in social hierarchies strongly influences motivation as well as physical and mental health,” said NIMH Director Thomas R Insel, M.D. “This first glimpse into how the brain processes that information advances our understanding of an important factor that can impact public health.”

… “The processing of hierarchical information seems to be hard-wired, occurring even outside of an explicitly competitive environment, underscoring how important it is for us,” said Zink. Key study findings included:

  • The area that signals an event’s importance, called the ventral striatum, responded to the prospect of a rise or fall in rank as much as it did to the monetary reward, confirming the high value accorded social status.
  • Just viewing a superior human “player,” as opposed to a perceived inferior one or a computer, activated an area near the front of the brain that appears to size people up – making interpersonal judgments and assessing social status. A circuit involving the mid-front part of the brain that processes the intentions and motives of others and emotion processing areas deep in the brain activated when the hierarchy became unstable, allowing for upward and downward mobility.
  • Performing better than the superior “player” activated areas higher and toward the front of the brain controlling action planning, while performing worse than an inferior “player” activated areas lower in the brain associated with emotional pain and frustration.
  • The more positive the mood experienced by participants while at the top of an unstable hierarchy, the stronger was activity in this emotional pain circuitry when they viewed an outcome that threatened to move them down in status.  In other words, people who felt more joy when they won also felt more pain when they lost.

“Such activation of emotional pain circuitry may underlie a heightened risk for stress-related health problems among competitive individuals,” suggested Meyer-Lindenberg. 

Read the rest here

With such a strong intrinsic reward system, the incentives for maintaining high status in an organization would outweigh those involved in carrying out the organization’s core mission – i.e. ” leaders” have a built-in drive to maintain the status quo at the expense of any possible nominal objective. The predisposition would also be present to look for hierarchical couterparts that do not exist in adversarial organizations that have a network structure and to ” sabotage” networked and “modular structures” on our own side in order to transform them into a hierarchy than can better fulfill the ego-needs of a “high status” individual.


Switch to our mobile site