Cats as 16th century weapons, foxes as Old Testament precursors
Saturday, September 7th, 2019[ by Charles Cameron — cat picture meets strategy, history meets scripture ]
.
Here you go:
With thanks to @alabandine.
[ by Charles Cameron — cat picture meets strategy, history meets scripture ]
.
Here you go:
With thanks to @alabandine.
[ by Charles Cameron — I may quote scripture here, but the question is not one of church vs state, but of morality vs legality ]
.
On the question of giving water to the illegal thirsty, we are clearly split:
**
The scripture I have in mind isn’t the tale of the Good Samaritan, relevant though that is. No, it’s the list of what have come to bve called the acts of corporal mercy, as formulated in the gospel of Matthew:
I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me. .. Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it to me.
The Good Samaritan instinctively acted on these commands, even though he lived only in the imagination of the man about whom the gospels would be written decades later. In that story, that morally compelling fiction, his action is contrasted with that of the priestly scholars of the law — and the lawyer who asked Christ the question which prompted that story is counseled by him to show mercy..
**
Sources:
Tucson, Jury deadlocks 8-4 for acquittal WaPo, Judge rejects good Samaritan defense
**
Morality vs legalism?
At this point in human culture, is it even a question?
[ by Charles Cameron — just alerting you to the sequel ]
.
Since my life these days is largely spent in bed or in my wheelchair, and since I don’t have access to my books,I’ve been working on a slew of book reviews. This is just to forewarn you that Margaret Atwood has a sequel to The Handmaid’s Tale coming out very soon:
Amazon:
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale Margaret Atwood, The Testaments
**
While we’re at it, compare and contrast:
The theoretical Calvinist theological underpinning of Atwood‘s tale would be:
RJ Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law
**
And thanks, Gregory:
Ye Gods, dirt & grime are no match for the moral reform of the Dutch Calvinists pic.twitter.com/RhbFTL8ku4
— Gregoresate (@GregorySMcMurry) September 5, 2019
!! Yes !!
[ by Charles Cameron — it’s the first quote that carries the implication of genocide, but what of the rest? ]
.
It’s not a joke, is it? Myanmar..
The United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention warns of certain indicators that
“provide an environment conducive to the commission of atrocity crimes,” including
“increased politicization of identity” and discriminatory “measures or legislation”
targeting protected groups. In addition to certain prohibited acts, such as killing members
of a group, genocidal States often use legal and administrative tools to facilitate the
destruction of a targeted group “in whole or in part.”In Myanmar, successive governments have implemented measures and legislation to erase
Rohingya Muslims’ identity and rights, creating an enabling environment for genocide.
**
It’s not a joke, is it? Assam..
UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi today expressed his concern over the publication of a National Register of Citizens (NRC) that may put large numbers of people in India’s north-eastern state of Assam at risk of becoming stateless.
It is too early to say what the nationality status of those left off the National Register, some 1.9 million according to the authorities, may ultimately be. UNHCR is concerned, however, that many are at risk of statelessness if they do not possess another nationality.
**
That’s a DoubleQuote — but it’s also pattern recognition, and the start of a possible concatenation of such quotes — a mala of urgencies.
BTW, it’s more than possible, as Myanmar >> Bangladesh migration illustrates, that mass migration across national borders may be a pragmatic alternative to genocide — but that threatens national sovereignty, doesn’t it?
[ by Charles Cameron — a bumpy ride from the void, geographically and legally envisioned, via strategy to complexity and fiction, winding up in Rushdie territory with his Quichotte ]
.
Just a few odds and ends that spark, I suppose, evens and beginnings.
**
The Mandarin, The rocky road to reconciliation in Australia
the British declare Australia terra nullius, a place belonging to no one. The land is most definitely not a ‘null’, but the doctrine of terra nullius is a convenient legal cover for theft on a colossal scale.
Terra nullius — is that the legal equivalent of a cartographer’s here there be dragons?
**
Also a nullius matter?
Moot for real or mootness as gamesmanship?” the legendary Supreme Court correspondent Linda Greenhouse asked in The New York Times.
That’s from Garrett Epps, ‘The Supreme Court Is Not Well. And the People Know It.’ in the Atlantic.
A moot law is a null law, surely. But though both are fascinating, neither one addresses the viod plenum which so interests me. Still..
**
Continuing my meander through one level of abstraction above regular reality..
WOTR, THE GREAT DUALITY AND THE FUTURE OF THE ARMY: DOES TECHNOLOGY FAVOR THE OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE?
In war, firepower favors the defensive and maneuver favors the offensive.
Hm. Assuming this is common knowledge, having two doctrines is one thing — but how many generals have two mindsets, and can switch between them as appropriate. I’m hoping Zen and or other strategy buffs will weigh in here. This is abstract enough to catch my eye, but war is gritty enough that even strategic thinking comes with trench mud and blood attached.
**
A Brexit madman or master bluffer? What’s behind Boris Johnson’s suspension of UK Parliament
Game theory – the study of strategy and decision making – offers some clues. In the language of game theory, Johnson faces a serious “credibility” problem. He needs to convince the various players in the Brexit game – including the EU as a whole, Ireland, MPs in the House of Commons, the public and businesses – that he will indeed have the UK leave the EU, if need be, without a deal in place, on the October deadline.
Currently, many of these players do not truly believe that he would – perhaps informed by the inaction of the government of Johnson’s predecessor, Theresa May, or the high stakes involved of leaving without a deal.
Hm, a governmental void as strategy.
That excerpt offers a neat illustration of why human decision-making is so complex and, by extension, fallible
It also illustrates the utility of a HipBone-variant game board for carrying the voices of multiple stakeholders in mind at once — a polyphony (multiple voices) in counterpoint (point counter point) —
Time, clipping the wings of possibility, increases tension at a decision fork where, as another Channel News Asia article also notes, Britain is in its “deepest crisis in living memory”.
Okay:
Complexity? the national and international interests, personal interests, thoughts, and feelings of all participants, as above. How good is Boris Johnson at evaluating all those influences?
After a long period of digestion, I’m willing to believe a novelist or TV showrunner might be able to capture the web of influences involved. But that’s after the fact, after the fork — after fatal decisions have been made. And we call them fatal both because they produce fatalities, and because the Fates, and because the Fates, the Moirae spin them.
**
For instance:
To face a people and catch its characteristics as if being confronted by just one person is practically impossible especially when the intention is to give an admonition… or suggest a way to govern it. It is much safer to rely on literature, on the way writers have represented her life, her way of being, the constant mobility of her reality and the variety present in the characters described.
That’s from an account of Sicily and its Mafia connections, but the novel offering access to the understanding of a people by means of the interplay of characters..?
**
Meanwhile at Brownpundits, my other home..
Dr Hamid Hussain, An Extension for General Bajwa
:Bless the British who instilled a sense of professionalism in officer corps that has taken a big hit in successor Indian and Pakistani armies. The most scathing criticism came from Lieutenant General Nathu Singh of Indian army who said, “I have not known a British officer who placed his own interests before his country’s, and I have hardly known any Indian officer who did not”
That’s quite a tribute —
the master gamekeeper at the national park
Just for the phrasing..
**
& finally:
somewhere between a pinball machine and a three-dimensional game of snakes and ladders
That’s not a description of goepolitical life in the Presidency of Trump, it’s praise for Salman Rushdie‘s upcoming novel, upcoming my way at least, I hope, Quichotte
Enough!