AQ Conference Call, 2: what a difference a week makes
[ by Charles Cameron — all the AQ leaders teleported into this one cave for their annual conference, see, and spoke to reporters as they were leaving for “near” and “far” – no wardrobe malfunctions, though ]
.
Following up on my post, AQ Conference Call, 1…
.
When Eli Lake and Josh Rogin broke the story it was huge, wardrobe-malfunction huge, although AQ doesn’t really do wardrobe malfunctions the way we do at the Superbowl:
It wasn’t just any terrorist message that triggered U.S. terror alerts and embassy closures—but a conference call of more than 20 far-flung al Qaeda operatives, Eli Lake and Josh Rogin report.
Okay, conference call, I’ve been on some of those. Phones, right?
@barbarastarrcnn We used conference call because it was generic enough. But it was not a telephone based communications.
— Eli Lake (@EliLake) August 8, 2013
Ah — Skype, maybe, or Google+?
Nope.
Nobody is disputing the facts of our al Qaeda story. Semantic debate over the term "conference call" totally misses the significance.
— Josh Rogin (@joshrogin) August 8, 2013
Semantic? Okay… but anyway, “The crucial intercept that prompted the U.S. government to close embassies in 22 countries was a conference call between al Qaeda’s senior leaders and representatives of several of the group’s affiliates throughout the region” — right?
Um, no.
Here’s the more recent piece by Lara Jakes and Adam Goldman for AP to which JM Berger’s quote (lower panel, above) was pointing:
Al-Qaida fighters have been using secretive chat rooms and encrypted Internet message boards for planning and coordinating attacks — including the threatened if vague plot that U.S. officials say closed 19 diplomatic posts across Africa and the Middle East for more than a week.
It’s highly unlikely that al-Qaida’s top leader, Ayman al-Zawahri, or his chief lieutenant in Yemen, Nasser al-Wahishi, were personally part of the Internet chatter or, given the intense manhunt for both by U.S. spy agencies, that they ever go online or pick up the phone to discuss terror plots, experts say.
More specifically:
A U.S. intelligence official said the unspecified threat was discussed in an online forum joined by so many jihadist groups that it included a representative from Boko Haram, the Nigerian insurgency that has loose and informal ties to al-Qaida. Two other intelligence officials characterized the threat as more of an alert to get ready to launch potential attacks than a discussion of specific targets.
One of the officials said the threat began with a message from al-Wahishi, head of the Yemen-based al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, to al-Zawahri, who replaced Osama bin Laden as the core al-Qaida leader. The message essentially sought out al-Zawahri’s blessing to launch attacks. Al-Zawahri, in turn, sent out a response that was shared on the secretive online jihadi forum.
So the jihadis have a web-forum, and messages from Zawahiri get quoted there?
A stunning new development!
**
DoubleTweet Sources:
Eli Lake JM Berger
Articles pointed to:
Eli Lake JM Berger
**
Edited to add:
FYI, there’s an extended treatment of the whole affair by Ken Silverstein now up at Harper’s, Anatomy of an Al Qaeda “Conference Call” — h/t Joshua Foust.
August 16th, 2013 at 9:12 pm
but what i don’t get is why would anyone care?
August 16th, 2013 at 10:09 pm
internet click bait
August 17th, 2013 at 3:51 am
Hi Derek:
.
Care about what? AQ plotting a 9/11 size strike? AQ using advanced communications? Government leaks suggesting NSA-style surveillance systems succeed in breaking AQ security (at a time when NSA surveillance in general is feeling the heat of popular scrutiny)? Factually incorrect reporting of a story dealing with one or all of the above? How this poisons our understanding of any or all of the above? The generally deplorable state of journalism?
.
The answer would be different in each case. And part of what I like about the somewhat oblique style of my posts is its ability to stir thoughts not just about one topic, but a congeries… in different minds and mind-sets.
December 17th, 2013 at 6:12 pm
This is the classic image of acne, small round pus-and-oil filled
globes sticking out on your forehead or anywhere else on the face.
Far from being the ‘breakthrough’ drug for depression,
don’t you agree. Using the tips below can give you clearer skin
and make you feel better about yourself.