zenpundit.com » Blog Archive » Book Review: The Mind of War

Book Review: The Mind of War

The Mind of War: John Boyd and American Security by Dr. Grant T. Hammond

The Mind of War went on to my “must read” list after attending the Boyd 07 Conference at Quantico, where I heard Dr. Frans Osinga deliver a keynote presentation on the theories of Colonel John Boyd, based on Osinga’s exhaustive study of Boyd’s personal papers, which culminated first in a PhD dissertation and then later was published as Science, Strategy and War: The Strategic Theory of John Boyd. Col. Osinga credits Boyd associate Dr. Grant Hammond and The Mind of War with introducing him to the ideas of John Boyd and inspiring him in his own intellectual journey as a student to try to understand and explain Boyd’s strategic theories.

Unlike Osinga or Robert Coram, author of the celebrated biography, Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War, Hammond enjoyed the advantage of having had a personal and intellectual relationship with Col. Boyd, one that Hammond called “Transforming”. This gives Hammond’s shorter biography insights into how Boyd’s mind worked that Coram and Osinga miss (or more properly, could not have known), including  the “perverse glee” Boyd felt in discovering and exploring the Darwinian mismatch between perception and unfolding reality. While Robert Coram wrote about the demanding aspect that collaborators sometimes felt when dealing with the relentlessly autodidactic John Boyd, who could call at any time of the day or night and talk for hours, Hammond was actually on the receiving end of this treatment for six years:

“Let me illustrate by going through my notes of three telephone calls in the space of a single week in november 1995….He went through differences in his work,the portion that dealt with static or fixed data (energy manuverability) and that dealt with potential….He prefers potentialities. He then proceeded to review his latest reading. In rather short order, I was instructed to read Konrad Lorenz’s Behind The Mirror, Ernst Mayer’s The Growth of Biological Thought, Gerard Radnitsky and W.W Bartley’s edited collection entitled Evolutionary Epistemology (focus on particularly on Karl Popper’s essay and that of Donald T. Campbell) and Stuart A. Kauffman’s The Origins of Order.

….From biology to chaos, future defense scenarios to information war, Sun Tzu and Musashi to the Ames Spy Case, genetic algorithms to how one thinks and learns, airbase security and police to the Japanese art of war, evolutionary epistemology and the growth of biological thought – to Boyd, they are all clearly interrelated.” [ 184-186]

Note that Hammond’s description of just three phone calls with John Boyd ran over three pages of text and the above excerpt reveals only a fraction of the concepts and source material discussed. From Hammond’s The Mind of War the reader gains a good appreciation of how Boyd’s analogically oriented, synthesizing, pattern recognizing, fluidly connective mind worked in practice with a personality or character that could make Boyd competitive, confrontational, admirable, brusque, antagonizing or heroic at different turns.

The Mind of War also puts Boyd’s role in the “military reform movement” into greater clarity and sheds more light on Boyd’s retirement years of declining personal health, intellectual epiphanies, and partial rehabilitation with the Air Force brass that continued to nevertheless inflict slights and insults on the rebel who had repeatedly “bucked the system. While The Mind of War is primarily an intellectual biography of John Boyd, the human dimension is far from absent in Hammond’s writing.

For the serious student of modern strategy or aficianados of Col. John Boyd, Grant Hammond’s The Mind of War is a must read book. It forms a necessary bridge between Robert Coram’s classic style, popular, biography and Osinga’s strictly military-academic treatise on Boydian strategic theory. The Mind of War helps the reader better comprehend either book while remaining a great and highly informative work in it’s own right. Strongly recommended.

4 Responses to “Book Review: The Mind of War”

  1. josephfouche Says:

    The book’s sitting on a shelf just over there. I need to get through my anti-library.

  2. YT Says:

    Josephfouche : Dude, it’s a MUST read.

    Zen :

    "From biology to chaos, future defense scenarios to information war, Sun Tzu and Musashi to the Ames Spy Case, genetic algorithms to how one thinks and learns, airbase security and police to the Japanese art of war, evolutionary epistemology and the growth of biological thought."

    Wished I had pals like this to talk to, instead of the same ol’ everytime I talk to ’em. I’ve got an associate who constantly drones on everythin’ Chinese. God save me!

  3. Dan Ford Says:

    I envy your chance to attend a substantive Boyd Conference. The 2009 iteration doesn’t seem to be getting off the ground. But if Col-Dr Osinga inspired you to read The Mind of War, perhaps he was being overly modest. His own book, though somewhat repetitive, is surely the best thing ever written on Boyd. You’re right, of course, that the personal element gives Dr Hammond an advantage. I wrote him recently, trying to date the wonderful Boyd q&a session that’s on YouTube; he was able to date it exactly, since he was the one who’d arranged for Boyd to make the presentation at the Air Force War College at Maxwell field. (The actual briefing isn’t on YouTube, perhaps because it wasn’t videoed since the room would have been darkenedd for the slides.) I’ve posted a comparison of all the Boyd books on War in the Modern World. Blue skies! — Dan Ford

  4. zen Says:

    Hi Dan,
    .
    I have to agree with you on SSW – it was slow going in parts, some of the source material is dense and very complex but it is an irreplaceable text. Frans was kind enough to give ppl  at the conference PDF copies when his publisher was still hawking the ridiculous
    $ 150 a copy version prior to the second edition.
    .
    I see you have priced your Boydian essay to move. Smart. Thank you very much for the kind words on The John Boyd Roundtable – speaking for the contributors, we are all very pleased when anyone reports enjoying it or finding it useful.


Switch to our mobile site