Flight paths in simulation and reality
[ by Charles Cameron — once again, one thing reminds me of another ]
.
OTOH, in reality:
Nearly 100,000 people spending their Saturday night crossing the Atlantic.
? https://t.co/N6HvztbMgU pic.twitter.com/kpP56lOMro
— Flightradar24 (@flightradar24) March 5, 2017
OTOH, in simulation:
**
The simple excellence of rulesets in agent-based modeling is wonderfully demonstrated by the way the eye can “recognize” the movements on a flock of birds or a school of fish in Craig Reynolds‘ boids — rulesets notably simpler than the explanations for flocking behavior previously suggested by biologists.
Metacognitive question: what’s the cognitive means by which we humans can “see” that the boid simulation is a sufficiently accurate representation of birds flocking and fishes schooling to account for them? — and ditto for birds flocking and fishes schooling, how do we “see” them as naturally equivalent? — and ditto for those birds flocking and fishes schooling and our earlier biological accounts of their behaviors? —
With a hypothesis, we can test by finding predictable or disconfirmative instances beyond those on which the hypothesis is suggested.. but when the similarity is visually perceived?
