The human voice, counterpoint, & the analysis of complex systems

That single paragraph — and Gould‘s clear understanding that contrapuntal thinking can be applied to the polyphony of human voices, not just in the musical sphere — prompts me to go further, and assert that complexity studies with application to the human condition and intelligence and geopolitical analysis will all, sooner or later, arrive at the practice of contrapuntal thinking as basic to their deeper purposes.

**

Refocusing at the national level, on Glenn Gould‘s native Canada:

I’ve mentioned the simultaneity of voices in social contexts such as listening, hearing and understanding the views and voices of multiple stakeholder. In similar vein, Howes suggests Gould‘s own taste for counterpoint stems from and reflects the Canadian Constitution:

Gould understood music to provide a model of society, and the performing artist, hence, to be performing society, as well as music. Along these lines, counterpoint, Gould’s preferred musical style, provides a specially apt model for comprehending the constitutional structure of the Canadian state. Gould’s interest in keeping the different voices of a fugue distinct, equal, and bound together parallels the concern of the Canadian state to keep the different parties to Confederation distinct, equal and bound together. In this difficult task, however, there is always a risk of overemphasizing or losing one of the voices. If Quebec is proclaimed “a distinct society” will that disturb the equality of the provinces (for surely all are distinct); if it is not, will that lead to the separation of Quebec and the break-up of Confederation? This bi-cultural counterpoint confronts Canadians daily, from the bilingual product information on their cereal boxes to the reports of English/French political jousting on the evening news.

Counterpoint, or in more general terms, polyphony, is non-dialectical, for it involves the interweaving of voices, of ideas, rather than the Hegelian process of thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Polyphony as social theory does not, therefore, entail the negation of any countervailing views the way, say, a dialectical social philosophy would. With polyphony, accommodation or peaceful co-presence takes the place of negation.

**

Readings:

  • New Yorker, Roomful of Teeth Is Revolutionizing Choral Music
  • NY Times, The Glenn Gould Contrapuntal Radio Show
  • Open Culture, Listen to Glenn Gould’s Shockingly Experimental Radio Documentary
  • Hermitary, Glenn Gould’s The Solitude Trilogy
  • Canadian Icon, Glenn Gould’s Contrapuntal Constitution
  • Politics & Culture, An interview with Edward Said
  • Charles Cameron, Pulitzer : Lamar :: Nobel : Dylan?
  • Charles Cameron, Getting deeper into Koestler
  • Mike Sellers, Advanced Game Design: A systems Approach
  • Ali Minai, A core concern of our research is the desire to catch ‘creativity in the act.’
  • **

    More Teeth — your reward for reading this far:

    And BachGlenn Gould plays Contrapunctus IX from The Art of Fugue — on organ:

    Page 3 of 3 | Previous page

    1. Piercello:

      Charles, this is perhaps my favorite of your many posts. Thank you.

    2. Sally Benzon:

      Astonishing, Charles! You’ve outdone yourself here! Thank you.

    3. Charles Cameron:

      I’m very appreciative of your generous words, Sally and Piercello
      .
      In tweets which both continue and expand its thrust, Ali Minai responded to this post:

      Polyphony, in an abstract sense, applies not just to human complex systems but to all complex systems. The richness of life generated by evolution is a readout of the polyphony inherent in the interaction of genomes in the context of the environment.
      .
      One of the most unappreciated facts about natural complexity is that it emerges from interaction of simpler processes, and not from some prior complexity. Accept that you understand half of self-organization.

    4. Charles Cameron:

      Complex human systems nicely limned in Liberals and Conservatives React in Wildly Different Ways to Repulsive Pictures:

      Most people aren’t reading policy memos to inform every decision. Differences of opinion are shaped by contrasting life experiences: where you live; how you were raised; whether you’re rich or poor, young or old. Emotion comes into the picture, and emotion has a biological basis, at least in part. All of this and more combines into a stew without a fixed recipe, even if many of the ingredients are known.

    5. Charles Cameron:

      Mike Sellers respopnded to this post on FB:

      As always, your posts lead me in multiple (contrapuntal?) directions. The diagram above makes me think of two intersecting hipbone boards, where the intersecting nodes share the same value, but in different contexts — homophones at a simple level, antilogies, irony, and humor a bit further on maybe.
      .
      There’s also a simple analogy of additive and subtractive color that occurs to me: the Hegelian thesis-antithesis-synthesis seems more subtractive, like paint, vs. the additive nature of polyphony, where an inverse, a counterpoint, nevertheless adds to the whole rather than taking away from it.