zenpundit.com » Blog Archive » The Forum and The Tower, a review

The Forum and The Tower, a review

[by J. Scott Shipman]

the-forum-and-the-tower.jpeg

The Forum and The Tower by Mary Ann Glendon

“The relationship between politics and the academy has been marked by mutual fascination and wariness since the time of Plato.”

The first sentence on the flap of the dust jacket of this very good and informative small book. Professor Glendon, who is the Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard Law school, set out to write a book for her students that would answer ageless questions such as:

“Is politics such a dirty business, or are conditions so unfavorable, that couldn’t make a difference? What kinds of compromises can one make for the sake of getting and keeping a position from which one might be able to have influence on the course of events? What kinds of compromises can one make for the sake of achieving a higher political goal? When does prudent accommodation become pandering? When should one speak truth to power no matter what the risk, and when is it acceptable, as Burke put it, to speak the truth with measure that one may speak it longer? When does one reach the point at which one concludes, as Plato finally did, that circumstances are so unfavorable that only the reasonable course of action is to “keep quiet and offer up prayers for one’s own welfare and for that of one’s country”?”

Professor Glendon answers these questions and more through brief examinations of the lives and works of some of history’s most important figures:

Plato

Cicero

Justinian, Tribonian, and Irnerius

Machiavelli

Thomas Hobbs and Edward Coke

John Locke

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Edmund Burke

Tocqueville

Max Weber

Oliver Wendell Holmes

Eleanor Roosevelt and Charles Malik

All in all, I believe Professor Glendon has provided a uniquely valuable book to help her students and other readers to answers those questions. In short but focused chapters of about 20 pages each, she provides mini-biographies of the subjects above and how they answered the some of the questions both in their lives and in their philosophy. Some of her subjects were thinkers lacking the abilities for the public square, Plato, for instance, but were enormously influential just the same. Rare were those like Cicero and Burke who were equally comfortable in the political arena or the academy.

My favorite chapters were on Plato, Cicero, Machiavelli, and Burke—mostly because I’ve read a respectable amount of their work. That said, I have not read Plato’s The Laws—and Professor Glendon suggests it is much better than The Republic—which I have read and did not much enjoy. Not surprisingly, The Laws will be on my list for this winter.

The inclusion of Eleanor Roosevelt and Charles Malik was something of a surprise, but Professor Glendon is weaving a sub-story through each chapter and illustrating how Roosevelt and Malik’s work on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was something of culmination and extension of over 2,000 years of thinking and political action—not in the context of human progress towards a utopia of sorts, which she wisely rejects,  but rather a reflection the common threads of political thought throughout history.

While this is not criticism, I would have liked to have seen a chapter on John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, and a chapter on Karl Marx, whom she frequently mentions.

This is a book that is approachable and readable, and in our tumultuous domestic and global political climate, important.

She closes with this illuminating sentence:

“If one message emerges from the stories collected here, it is that just because one does not see the results of one’s best efforts in one’s own lifetime does not mean those efforts were in vain.”

Professor Glendon is to be commended for a job “well done!”

The book comes with my highest recommendation and may be the best book I’ve read this calendar year. Add this book to your must read list.

.
Referenced works you may find of interest (some of these works are out of print and expensive—for simplicity I’ve used Amazon links): 

The Laws of Plato, translated by Thomas Pangle

Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome’s Greatest Politician, by Anthony Everitt

Cicero, A Portrait, by Elizabeth Rawson (Glendon praised this book.)

A Panorama of the World’s Legal Systems, John Henry Wigmore

The Life of Nicolo Machiavelli, Roberto Ridolfi

The Prince, translated by Harvy Mansfield

Machiavelli, by Quentin Skinner

The Lion and the Throne, Catherine Drinker Bowen

The Spirit of Modern Republicanism, by Thomas Pangle

Statesmanship and Party Government, by Harvy Mansfield

The Great Melody, A Thematic biography of Edmund Burke, by Conor Cruise O’Brien (I read this wonderful book in 1992 when it was released: highly recommended.)

6 Responses to “The Forum and The Tower, a review”

  1. zen Says:

    Excellent review Scott!
    .
    This sounds like a great resource and an enjoyable tome. Academia sometimes looks askance at grand synthesis and commentary such as this but that’s highly ironic, given the durability of classics like Plutarch’s Lives in educating generations of leaders (the aforementioned John Adams, for one). Examples illustrate principles.

  2. J.ScottShipman Says:

    Hi Zen,
    .
    Many thanks!
    .
    The books she referenced could easily get my reading even more convoluted. When was reading, I thought I recognized Thomas Pangle’s name—it took me about an hour going through my books to find that he wrote an essay in Alan Bloom’s Confronting the Constitution—something I slogged through years ago—and little memory of, btw.
    .
    Definitely want to read the Cicero biographies.

  3. zen Says:

    Cicero is an interesting figure, a top tier intellect, an unrivalled speaker and the virtual founder of the profession of law yet a second-rate politician,  not strong enough to create a viable middle-course for Romans between Caesar and the Optimate extremists. He was effective on the attack ( Cataline Conspiracy, the Philipics) and widely respected as a lawyer and speech-writer even by his rivals but was unable to build a loyal following (clentela) that could have made Cicero sway Roman politics on his own. Maybe a lack of decisiveness or the stigma of being a "new man" among the patricians with long lineages.
    .
    I have read Cicero’s On the Good Life – an undercurrent of self-pity and pomposity but otherwise solid quasi-stoic advice that I suspect Cicero was giving to himself retrospectively in retirement as he waited for the axe to fall

  4. J.ScottShipman Says:

    Hi Zen,
    .
    On the Good Life was a pretty good read. Your comment drove me back to Glendon’s book—and I was reminded that she framed Cicero’s explicit answers to the questions above. He had obviously already framed and discovered answers.
    .
    Many thanks!

  5. Fred Leland Says:

    Great review Scott as usual you have peaked my interest in another book. 🙂  

  6. J.ScottShipman Says:

    Hi Fred, Many thanks!


Switch to our mobile site