zenpundit.com » Blog Archive » Booksbooksbooksbooks….
«
»

Booksbooksbooksbooks….

Two more for the pile….

  

Another Bloody Century by Colin Gray

Iraq & the Evolution of American Strategy by Steven Metz

Comments or opinions?

This entry was posted on Monday, August 1st, 2011 at 2:15 pm and is filed under 20th century, 21st century, academia, America, analytic, authors, book, Clausewitzian, counterinsurgency, defense, DIME, Evolution, foreign policy, geopolitics, government, historians, historiography, history, ideas, insurgency, intellectuals, iraq, islamic world, military, military history, national security, non-state actors, politics, reading, social science, SSI, steven metz, strategist, strategy, Strategy and War, Tactics, terrorism, The Project, theory, transnational criminal organization, tribes, war. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “Booksbooksbooksbooks….”

  1. A.E. Says:
    August 1st, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    Metz book is best Iraq book I’ve read ,hands down.

  2. joey Says:
    August 2nd, 2011 at 4:18 pm

    "Another Bloody Century"
    I read it, when I was finished I realized that I couldn’t remember what it was about.Reminded me of a policy brief, said very little, and nothing that could be construed as controversial. 

  3. onparkstreet Says:
    August 4th, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    I’ll have to pick up Dr. Metz’s book one of these days.
    .
    I picked up a bunch of stuff at a Borders closing recently:

    1. Step Across This Line: Collected NonFiction 1992-2002, Rushdie.

    2. The Stories of John Cheever.

    3. The Portable Dorothy Parker.
    .
    I tried reading a Milan Kundera novel – which I liberally quoted at SWJ – and Gates’ memoirs, but didn’t finish either book. Not in the mood.
    .
    Er, I made a silly off-the-top of my head comment at SWJ by poking fun at people who spend their time discussing "how many heads of Clausewitz can fit on the head of a pin," only to come here and see a post about, er, Clausewitz.
    .
    Put my foot in it (typical!) and didn’t mean to refer to you, your blog, or anyone in particular. I could just as easily have written that I was irritated by a tone of scholasticism or that I was just plain irritated and in a bad mood.
    .
    Hope nobody around here saw that comment and thought I was referring to this blog. Or anyone in particular. Because I wasn’t.
    .
    – Madhu

Switch to our mobile site